Decide with caveats attached
A practice for working with caveats, drawn from the Caveatist Archive. Mark what kind of statement you are adding (observed, tested, proposed, analogy, mythological, rejected, unresolved); state grounds separately from everything that influenced you; ask what changes if a caveat is true; decide with the unresolved caveats written into the decision; withdraw rather than erase. Each decision or review ends with a fixed record: the decision, its grounds, the caveats it retains, those not pursued, any withdrawals and what would reopen it; the skill includes a worked example. It works in prose. The plugin also connects the hosted Caveat MCP server, whose five read-only tools validate, check, test, explain and trace Caveat programs sent inline; it keeps nothing between requests. When the caveat-lang runtime is installed, it records the decision in a Caveat program instead, where explain prints what each decision rests on and dependents answers what changes if evidence is wrong. Culture, not contract: it changes how you work, not what any runtime does, and it is corrigible. Mr. Caveat, the mechanical fortune teller on the icon, is not an authority.
Prisijungus prie „Caveat“, „ChatGPT“ gali dalytis susijusiais pokalbiais ir prisiminimais su šia programa, kad suteiktų konteksto jūsų užklausoms. Programa „Caveat“ šiuos duomenis naudoja pagal savo sąlygas ir privatumo politiką. Jei esate įjungę atmintį, programos duomenys gali būti naudojami siekiant proaktyviai pateikti naudingos informacijos ar pasiūlymų. „ChatGPT“ visada atsižvelgia į jūsų mokymo duomenų nuostatas, įskaitant duomenis iš prijungtų programų. Programų naudojimas gali kelti didesnę riziką. Savo nuostatose bet kada galite tvarkyti parinktis arba atjungti programas. Sužinoti daugiau