Decide with caveats attached
A practice for working with caveats, drawn from the Caveatist Archive. Mark what kind of statement you are adding (observed, tested, proposed, analogy, mythological, rejected, unresolved); state grounds separately from everything that influenced you; ask what changes if a caveat is true; decide with the unresolved caveats written into the decision; withdraw rather than erase. Each decision or review ends with a fixed record: the decision, its grounds, the caveats it retains, those not pursued, any withdrawals and what would reopen it; the skill includes a worked example. It works in prose. The plugin also connects the hosted Caveat MCP server, whose five read-only tools validate, check, test, explain and trace Caveat programs sent inline; it keeps nothing between requests. When the caveat-lang runtime is installed, it records the decision in a Caveat program instead, where explain prints what each decision rests on and dependents answers what changes if evidence is wrong. Culture, not contract: it changes how you work, not what any runtime does, and it is corrigible. Mr. Caveat, the mechanical fortune teller on the icon, is not an authority.
Izveidojot savienojumu ar Caveat, ChatGPT var kopīgot ar šo lietotni atbilstošās tērzēšanas un atmiņas, lai nodrošinātu papildu kontekstu taviem pieprasījumiem. Caveat veiktajai šo datu izmantošanai ir spēkā tā noteikumi un privātuma politika. Ja tev ir iespējota funkcija Atmiņa, lietotnes datus var izmantot, lai proaktīvi sniegtu noderīgu informāciju vai ieteikumus. ChatGPT vienmēr ievēro tavas datu izmantošanas apmācībai preferences, tostarp attiecībā uz datiem no savienotajām lietotnēm. Lietotņu izmantošana var būt saistīta ar paaugstinātu risku. Preferences vari pārvaldīt vai atvienot lietotnes jebkurā laikā sadaļā Iestatījumi. Uzzināt vairāk