Decide with caveats attached
A practice for working with caveats, drawn from the Caveatist Archive. Mark what kind of statement you are adding (observed, tested, proposed, analogy, mythological, rejected, unresolved); state grounds separately from everything that influenced you; ask what changes if a caveat is true; decide with the unresolved caveats written into the decision; withdraw rather than erase. Each decision or review ends with a fixed record: the decision, its grounds, the caveats it retains, those not pursued, any withdrawals and what would reopen it; the skill includes a worked example. It works in prose. The plugin also connects the hosted Caveat MCP server, whose five read-only tools validate, check, test, explain and trace Caveat programs sent inline; it keeps nothing between requests. When the caveat-lang runtime is installed, it records the decision in a Caveat program instead, where explain prints what each decision rests on and dependents answers what changes if evidence is wrong. Culture, not contract: it changes how you work, not what any runtime does, and it is corrigible. Mr. Caveat, the mechanical fortune teller on the icon, is not an authority.
Apabila disambungkan kepada Caveat, ChatGPT mungkin berkongsi sembang dan memori yang berkaitan dengan aplikasi ini untuk membantu memberikan konteks bagi permintaan anda. Penggunaan data ini oleh Caveat tertakluk pada terma dan dasar privasi mereka. Jika anda telah mendayakan Memori, data daripada aplikasi mungkin digunakan secara proaktif untuk memberikan maklumat atau cadangan yang berguna. ChatGPT sentiasa menghormati pilihan data latihan anda, termasuk untuk data daripada aplikasi bersambung. Penggunaan aplikasi mungkin membawa risiko tinggi. Anda boleh mengurus pilihan anda atau memutuskan sambungan daripada aplikasi pada bila-bila masa dalam tetapan anda. Ketahui lebih lanjut