\n\n

Full Issue Text

\n\n\n\n```markdown\n## Why\nPR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.\n\n## Tasks\n- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.\n- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.\n- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.\n- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.\n- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.\n- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.\n\n## Acceptance Criteria\n- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.\n- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.\n- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.\n- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.\n- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.\n- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.\n\n## Implementation Notes\n- Focus on concurrent development of provider abstraction, integration tests, dependency updates, example usage, and documentation to ensure alignment with acceptance criteria.\n- Ensure comprehensive test coverage by integrating evaluation and demonstration components together.\n\n

Background (previous attempt context)

\n\n- The previous implementation focused solely on validation/retry logic and neglected the complete multi-provider abstraction (e.g., missing `LLMProviderConfig` and `create_llm`).\n- Partial implementation of evaluation test cases and the absence of the example script resulted in key acceptance criteria being unmet.\n\n

\n```\n\n\n\n

\n\n—\nPR created automatically to engage Codex.\n\n\n> **Source:** Issue #4308\n\n","base","head","base_sha","10f60428048553a2caf3ba18be5313271f763ca7","head_sha","5dd63e88e43077fd8889dc2563e316a2e06441e7","head_repo_id","head_repo_full_name","merge_commit_sha","f3b89e4e73fb6310b7a62715efdc28ac58c2c8de","comments","diff","user",{"_263":264,"_159":264,"_314":-5,"_267":268,"_53":265},"commits",14,"changed_files",11,"additions",457,"deletions",52,"email","events",[],[],"messages",[],{"_104":386,"_108":105,"_362":387},{"_104":348,"_349":350},{"_104":323,"_324":325,"_326":327,"_328":329,"_330":-5},"pr","pr_title","Add keepalive checklists for issue #4308","pr_message","### Motivation\n- Provide a keepalive bootstrap to enable Codex engagement and tracking for issue `#4308`.\n- Capture and reuse the source issue scope, tasks, and acceptance criteria so the keepalive loop can monitor progress.\n- Offer a single, discoverable entrypoint for agent operators and automation in `agents/codex-4308.md`.\n\n### Description\n- Add `agents/codex-4308.md` populated with `Scope`, `Tasks`, and `Acceptance Criteria` sections using `- [ ]` checklists.\n- Tasks list includes enhancements to `config_patch.py` retry logic, implementation of `LLMProviderConfig`, creation of `create_llm()`, dependency updates in `pyproject.toml`, docs and example scripts, eval test expansion, and validation updates.\n- The file serves as the canonical keepalive manifest for automated agents to consume and act on.\n\n### Testing\n- No automated unit or CI tests were run as part of this change.\n- Repository hooks ran during commit and reported checks skipped due to no files requiring those specific checks.\n- Standard CI pipelines will run after the PR is opened/updated to validate the change.","output_diff",{"_104":328,"_331":332,"_139":140,"_333":-5,"_303":334,"_335":336,"_337":338,"_339":340,"_341":43,"_342":343,"_344":-5},"pre_apply_patch","repo_id","/workspace/Trend_Model_Project","preapply_patch_base_commit_sha","diff --git a/agents/codex-4308.md b/agents/codex-4308.md\nindex e4d085aa4a0cd0ce998c5693d9d368725f086fde..b9a0580541067e0ac6ff8c11e67f2dbd54199587 100644\n--- a/agents/codex-4308.md\n+++ b/agents/codex-4308.md\n@@ -1 +1,24 @@\n \n+\n+## Scope\n+- [ ] PR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.\n+\n+## Tasks\n+- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.\n+- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.\n+- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.\n+- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n+- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.\n+- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.\n+- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.\n+- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.\n+\n+## Acceptance Criteria\n+- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.\n+- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.\n+- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.\n+- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n+- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.\n+- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.\n+- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.\n+- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.\n","external_storage_diff",{"_345":346,"_347":-5},"files_modified",1,"lines_added",23,"lines_removed","commit_message","Add keepalive checklists for issue 4308","additional_parent_commit_shas","file_id","file_000000002af071f79c8fc92b61d9c715","ttl","partial_repo_snapshot","files",[351],{"_352":353,"_354":-5,"_355":356,"_357":-5},"path","agents/codex-4308.md","contents","line_range_contents",[358],"missing_reason",{"_359":338,"_360":361,"_362":363,"_364":70},"line_range_start","line_range_end",24,"content",[365,173,366,367,173,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,173,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385],"contains_end_of_file","","## Scope","- [ ] PR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.","## Tasks","- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.","- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.","- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.","- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.","- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.","- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.","- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.","- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.","## Acceptance Criteria","- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.","- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.","- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.","- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.","- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.","- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.","- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.","- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.","message",[388,389,390],{"_391":57,"_57":394},{"_391":393,"_352":353,"_359":338,"_360":361},{"_391":57,"_57":392},"content_type","\n\n**Testing**\n* ⚠️ Not run (not requested).","repo_file_citation","**Summary**\n* Added scope, tasks, and acceptance criteria checklists for issue #4308 keepalive tracking in the Codex bootstrap file.",{"_104":304,"_53":96,"_108":304,"_397":398,"_399":400,"_401":402,"_143":-5,"_130":403},[95],"input_items",[423,424,425,426,427,428,429],"external_post_config",{"_404":405,"_236":170,"_406":281,"_247":-5,"_331":230,"_407":18,"_408":-5,"_409":-5,"_410":411,"_412":413,"_414":-5,"_415":-5,"_416":417,"_418":18,"_419":70,"_420":65,"_421":18,"_422":-5},"user_model_slug","slug",1767968491.581254,"installation_id",71148695,"pr_number","enable_internal_github_app_routing","gitlab_service_account_project_id","review_trigger","comment_id",3729109154,"comment_type","issue","pr_write_guard_token","pending_pr_reaction_id","pending_comment_reaction_id",322948388,"comment_if_no_findings","comment_on_error","share_url","is_parallel_review","review_summary_id",{"_104":386,"_108":304,"_362":443},{"_288":289,"_290":438,"_439":440,"_441":140,"_300":-5,"_104":442},{"_104":430,"_290":437,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":436,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":435,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":434,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":431,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},"pull_request_comment","\n## 🤖 Keepalive Loop Status\n\n**PR #4309** | Agent: **Codex** | Iteration 0/5\n\n### Current State\n| Metric | Value |\n|--------|-------|\n| Iteration progress | [----------] 0/5 |\n| Action | run (agent-run-skipped) |\n| Gate | success |\n| Tasks | 0/16 complete |\n| Keepalive | ✅ enabled |\n| Autofix | ❌ disabled |\n\n### Last Codex Run\n| Result | Value |\n|--------|-------|\n| Status | ⏭️ Skipped |\n| Reason | agent-run-skipped |\n\n### 🔍 Failure Classification\n| Error type | infrastructure |\n| Error category | transient |\n| Suggested recovery | Capture logs and context; retry once and escalate if the issue persists. |\n\n","side","line","\nStatus | ✅ no new diagnostics\nHistory points | 0\nTimestamp | 2026-01-09 14:03:30 UTC\nReport artifact | `autofix-report-pr-4309`\nRemaining | 0\nNew | 0\nNo additional artifacts\n","## Pull request overview\n\nThis is a bootstrap PR that creates a placeholder file to enable Codex agent engagement on issue #4308. The PR adds a single markdown file following the established repository pattern for automated agent bootstrapping.\n\n**Key Changes:**\n- Adds `agents/codex-4308.md` with an HTML comment to bootstrap Codex for issue #4308\n\n\n\n","PR created. Comment `@codex start` to request the plan. Tell Codex to reuse the scope, acceptance criteria, and task list from the source issue and publish them here with `- [ ]` checklists so keepalive keeps watching. After Codex replies, follow the instructions posted on the source issue to begin execution.","### Issue #4308: [Follow-up] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch (PR #4301)\n\n\n## Automated Status Summary\n#### Scope\nPR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.\n\n#### Tasks\n- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.\n- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.\n- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.\n- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.\n- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.\n- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.\n\n#### Acceptance Criteria\n- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.\n- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.\n- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.\n- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.\n- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.\n- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.\n\n\n

Full Issue Text

\n\n```markdown\n## Why\nPR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.\n\n## Tasks\n- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.\n- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.\n- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.\n- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.\n- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.\n- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.\n\n## Acceptance Criteria\n- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.\n- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.\n- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.\n- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.\n- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.\n- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.\n\n## Implementation Notes\n- Focus on concurrent development of provider abstraction, integration tests, dependency updates, example usage, and documentation to ensure alignment with acceptance criteria.\n- Ensure comprehensive test coverage by integrating evaluation and demonstration components together.\n\n

Background (previous attempt context)

\n```\n\n

","\n## Automated Status Summary\n#### Scope\nPR #4301 addressed issue #4300 but verification identified concerns (verdict: **CONCERNS**). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure to ensure robust error handling, complete provider abstraction, and comprehensive test coverage.\n\n\n## Context for Agent\n\n### Related Issues/PRs\n- [#4301](https://github.com/stranske/Trend_Model_Project/issues/4301)\n- [#4300](https://github.com/stranske/Trend_Model_Project/issues/4300)\n\n\n#### Tasks\n- [ ] Enhance the retry logic in the configuration patch processing function to retry up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure. Add automated tests to simulate repeated parse failures and verify error logging.\n- [ ] Implement the `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass to encapsulate provider configuration parameters.\n- [ ] Develop the `create_llm()` factory function for dynamic provider instantiation and add unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] Update the `pyproject.toml` file to include all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] Create or update the documentation file to include setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance.\n- [ ] Develop an example usage script demonstrating configuration and error handling for LLM providers.\n- [ ] Expand evaluation test cases to include specific scenarios and integrate them into the eval harness.\n- [ ] Review and update the unknown key validation logic to use the latest authoritative schema and handle dynamic keys.\n\n#### Acceptance criteria\n- [ ] The retry logic in `config_patch.py` attempts to reprocess a configuration patch up to `self.retries` times upon a parse failure, logging each error encountered.\n- [ ] The `LLMProviderConfig` dataclass encapsulates provider configuration parameters and supports at least 2 LLM providers.\n- [ ] The `create_llm()` factory function dynamically instantiates LLM providers and passes all unit and integration tests.\n- [ ] The `pyproject.toml` file includes all necessary provider dependencies with explicit version constraints.\n- [ ] The `examples/nl_config_demo.py` script demonstrates configuration and error handling for multiple LLM providers.\n- [ ] The documentation in `docs/llm_providers.md` includes setup instructions, configuration examples, and troubleshooting guidance for the LLM provider abstraction layer.\n- [ ] The evaluation harness in `tools/eval_config_patch.py` includes at least 10 test cases, covering specified scenarios.\n- [ ] The unknown key validator in `validation.py` detects keys not defined in the authoritative schema and flags them with `needs_review=True`, handling dynamic array indices and wildcard keys.\n\n\n\n

\n\n

Full Issue Text

Background (previous attempt context)

\n```\n\n\n\n

\n\n—\nPR created automatically to engage Codex.\n\n\n> **Source:** Issue #4308\n\n","base_ref","f651d94d481a8042ca7f637cdb2f383216da884f","head_ref","pull_request_info",[444],{"_391":57,"_57":445},"@codex start\n\nReuse the scope, acceptance criteria, and task list from the source issue and publish them here with `- [ ]` checklists so keepalive keeps watching.",[476,477,478],[],{"_318":475},{"_315":474},{"_315":473},{"_280":281,"_269":282,"_283":284,"_285":70,"_286":18,"_287":18,"_288":289,"_290":291,"_292":240,"_293":138,"_294":295,"_296":297,"_298":-5,"_299":-5,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":472,"_306":307,"_308":309,"_310":311,"_312":313},{"_53":134,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":18,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":459,"_178":-5,"_179":-5,"_180":18,"_181":460,"_183":461,"_185":462,"_187":463,"_189":464,"_191":465,"_193":-5,"_194":195,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":466,"_66":-5,"_130":202,"_203":467,"_205":468,"_207":208,"_209":18,"_210":18},{"_144":454},[455,456],{"_155":458,"_157":164},{"_155":457,"_157":158},{"_159":160,"_104":161,"_130":162},{"_159":165,"_104":161,"_130":166},{"_272":273,"_274":80,"_275":276,"_277":-5,"_278":-5,"_279":-5},[230],[271],[271],{"_230":469},{"_214":215,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_220":221,"_222":223,"_224":225,"_226":227,"_228":229},{},[],{"_213":18},{"_211":70,"_212":173},{"_53":232,"_159":233,"_234":470,"_236":170,"_237":238,"_239":240,"_241":242,"_243":244,"_245":246,"_247":75,"_248":-5,"_249":-5,"_250":-5,"_251":-5,"_252":-5,"_253":-5,"_254":-5,"_255":256,"_257":-5,"_66":471},{"_263":264,"_53":265,"_104":266,"_267":268,"_269":270},{"_259":18,"_260":18,"_261":18,"_262":18},{"_263":264,"_159":264,"_314":-5,"_267":268,"_53":265},[],[],[],{"_104":386,"_108":105,"_362":486},{"_104":348,"_349":481},{"_104":323,"_324":325,"_326":327,"_328":479,"_330":-5},{"_104":328,"_331":332,"_139":140,"_333":-5,"_303":334,"_335":480,"_337":338,"_339":340,"_341":43,"_342":343,"_344":-5},{"_345":346,"_347":-5},[482],{"_352":353,"_354":-5,"_355":483,"_357":-5},[484],{"_359":338,"_360":361,"_362":485,"_364":70},[365,173,366,367,173,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,173,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385],[487,488,489],{"_391":57,"_57":394},{"_391":393,"_352":353,"_359":338,"_360":361},{"_391":57,"_57":392},[520,521,522],[],{"_318":519},{"_315":518},{"_315":517},{"_280":281,"_269":282,"_283":284,"_285":70,"_286":18,"_287":18,"_288":289,"_290":291,"_292":240,"_293":138,"_294":295,"_296":297,"_298":-5,"_299":-5,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":516,"_306":307,"_308":309,"_310":311,"_312":313},{"_53":134,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":18,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":503,"_178":-5,"_179":-5,"_180":18,"_181":504,"_183":505,"_185":506,"_187":507,"_189":508,"_191":509,"_193":-5,"_194":195,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":510,"_66":-5,"_130":202,"_203":511,"_205":512,"_207":208,"_209":18,"_210":18},{"_144":498},[499,500],{"_155":502,"_157":164},{"_155":501,"_157":158},{"_159":160,"_104":161,"_130":162},{"_159":165,"_104":161,"_130":166},{"_272":273,"_274":80,"_275":276,"_277":-5,"_278":-5,"_279":-5},[230],[271],[271],{"_230":513},{"_214":215,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_220":221,"_222":223,"_224":225,"_226":227,"_228":229},{},[],{"_213":18},{"_211":70,"_212":173},{"_53":232,"_159":233,"_234":514,"_236":170,"_237":238,"_239":240,"_241":242,"_243":244,"_245":246,"_247":75,"_248":-5,"_249":-5,"_250":-5,"_251":-5,"_252":-5,"_253":-5,"_254":-5,"_255":256,"_257":-5,"_66":515},{"_263":264,"_53":265,"_104":266,"_267":268,"_269":270},{"_259":18,"_260":18,"_261":18,"_262":18},{"_263":264,"_159":264,"_314":-5,"_267":268,"_53":265},[],[],[],{"_104":386,"_108":105,"_362":530},{"_104":348,"_349":525},{"_104":323,"_324":325,"_326":327,"_328":523,"_330":-5},{"_104":328,"_331":332,"_139":140,"_333":-5,"_303":334,"_335":524,"_337":338,"_339":340,"_341":43,"_342":343,"_344":-5},{"_345":346,"_347":-5},[526],{"_352":353,"_354":-5,"_355":527,"_357":-5},[528],{"_359":338,"_360":361,"_362":529,"_364":70},[365,173,366,367,173,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,173,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385],[531,532,533],{"_391":57,"_57":394},{"_391":393,"_352":353,"_359":338,"_360":361},{"_391":57,"_57":392},[536,537,538,539,540,541,542],{"_404":405,"_236":170,"_406":281,"_247":-5,"_331":230,"_407":18,"_408":-5,"_409":-5,"_410":411,"_412":413,"_414":-5,"_415":-5,"_416":417,"_418":18,"_419":70,"_420":65,"_421":18,"_422":-5},{"_104":386,"_108":304,"_362":543},{"_288":289,"_290":438,"_439":440,"_441":140,"_300":-5,"_104":442},{"_104":430,"_290":437,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":436,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":435,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":434,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},{"_104":430,"_290":431,"_352":-5,"_432":-5,"_433":-5},[544],{"_391":57,"_57":445},"task_e_69610eea9eec8331be38001b24c3d817",1767968490.621088,"Github Mention: Codex bootstrap for #4308","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_576":43,"_577":578,"_579":-5,"_580":-5,"_570":581,"_582":-5,"_583":-5,"_584":-5,"_585":-5},"task_status_display",{"_564":565,"_566":170,"_141":138,"_567":-5,"_568":323},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[557],{"_53":558,"_559":95,"_560":561,"_562":140},"github-994241353-4309","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_280":281,"_269":282,"_283":284,"_285":70,"_286":18,"_287":18,"_288":289,"_290":291,"_292":240,"_293":138,"_294":295,"_296":297,"_298":-5,"_299":-5,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":563,"_306":307,"_308":309,"_310":311,"_312":313},"codex_updated_sha",{"_263":264,"_159":264,"_314":-5,"_267":268,"_53":265},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_569":95,"_123":124,"_570":571,"_106":572,"_573":-5,"_574":-5,"_575":323,"_125":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","turn_id","diff_stats",{"_337":338,"_339":340,"_341":43},[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_337":-5,"_339":-5,"_341":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","dd",{"_600":601,"_602":603},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","manageRootRouteStylesheet","mobileWebHandoffEnabled","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","paidCampaignAppRedirect","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",599],"traceId","1497433048216801488","traceTime",1788268325853]