\\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\\n> \\n> After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\\n> \\n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n> \\n>

\\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\\n> \\n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\\n> \\n> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.\\n> \\n> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\\n> \\n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\\n> \\n> **Review profile**: CHILL\\n> \\n> **Plan**: Pro\\n> \\n> **Run ID**: `92503d3b-8029-499a-8739-a93d11398f57`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📥 Commits

\\n> \\n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b2c6bedb280e674bb7a2840cb0cbf606621fce5 and 5ae0e96c35f71832b54379ff65f6a5e5e92c4a13.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\\n> \\n> * `CHANGELOG.md`\\n> * `docs/BEARING.md`\\n> * `docs/design/0009-rust-core-and-wasm-capability-abi/phase-0-ir-truth-manifest.md`\\n> * `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md`\\n> * `docs/method/backlog/bad-code/DX_format-check-toolchain-gap.md`\\n> * `docs/method/backlog/bad-code/README.md`\\n> * `package.json`\\n> * `scripts/README.md`\\n> * `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs`\\n> * `scripts/ir-parity-projection.mjs`\\n> * `scripts/smoke/repo-bats-prepush.sh`\\n> * `test/README.md`\\n> * `test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\\n\\n

\\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\\n\\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `codex/parity-projection-crosswalk`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/wesley&utm_content=514)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\\n\\n

\\n

❤️ Share

\\n\\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\\n\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"\\n\\n# 🔍 The Case of Pull Request #514\\n\\n## Plain-English Readout\\n\\n- **Holmes (evidence investigation)**: Holmes says this change should not ship in its current state. Main reasons: No evidence citations were available for trust analysis; test evidence is incomplete; schema coverage is incomplete.\\n- **Watson (independent verification)**: Watson found verification concerns. Most important concern: Low migration risk claimed but schema incomplete.\\n- **Moriarty (trend forecast)**: Moriarty sees progress as stalled right now, so forecast confidence is limited.\\n\\n## Suggested next actions\\n\\n1. Tighten citations so the report points to exact lines instead of whole files or coarse references.\\n2. Resolve Watson’s verification concerns before trusting the Holmes verdict as final.\\n3. Treat the readiness forecast as stalled until new evidence or real progress moves the trend again.\\n4. Add or strengthen tests for the schema elements and operations HOLMES flagged as weakly proven.\\n\\n

📚 Glossary (what the Holmes terms mean)

\\n\\n- **HOLMES**: Wesley’s main evidence investigation. It decides whether the cited proof is strong enough to justify shipping this commit.\\n- **WATSON**: An independent verification pass. It checks Holmes’s citations and score math instead of trusting them blindly.\\n- **MORIARTY**: A readiness forecast over time. It is advisory trend analysis, not the release gate itself.\\n- **Schema coverage score (SCS)**: How much of the schema has direct supporting evidence across generated artifacts and cited proof.\\n- **Test confidence index (TCI)**: How much test evidence exists for constraints, policies, relationships, and operations.\\n- **Migration risk index (MRI)**: How risky the schema change is to roll out. Lower is better.\\n- **Evidence trust**: Whether the report is backed by exact citations, whole-file citations, or coarse references. Weak trust means the claim may be directionally right but not specific enough to trust blindly.\\n- **Citation quality**: A count of exact line-span citations versus whole-file or coarse references.\\n- **ELEMENTARY**: Ready to ship based on the current evidence.\\n- **REQUIRES INVESTIGATION**: More work or review is needed before shipping.\\n- **YOU SHALL NOT PASS**: Do not ship this change in its current state.\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n

🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES full report (click to expand)

\\n\\n### 🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES Investigation\\n\\n- Generated: 2026-05-22T11:41:19.263Z\\n- Commit SHA: fb848c20c469872363841f41eaa3f23fc2bea599\\n- Bundle Version: 2.0.0\\n\\n> ⚠️ Evidence valid only for commit `fb848c2`\\n\\n## 🔍 Executive Deduction\\n\\n\\\"Watson, after careful examination of the evidence, I deduce...\\\"\\n\\n**Weighted Completion**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n**Scores**: SCS 0.0% · TCI 0.0% · MRI 0.0%\\n**Verification Status**: 0 claims verified\\n**Citation Quality**: 0 exact · 0 whole-file · 0 coarse\\n**Evidence Trust**: missing\\n**Ship Verdict**: YOU SHALL NOT PASS\\n\\n## 🧩 SCS Breakdown\\n\\n| Component | Score | Coverage |\\n|-----------|-------|----------|\\n| Sql | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\\n| Types | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\\n| Validation | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\\n| Tests | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\\n\\n## 🧪 TCI Breakdown\\n\\n| Component | Score | Coverage | Note |\\n|-----------|-------|----------|------|\\n| Unit Constraints | 0.0% | 0/104 | N/A |\\n| Unit Rls | 0.0% | — | N/A |\\n| Integration Relations | 0.0% | 0/3 | N/A |\\n| E2e Ops | N/A | — | Query operation test tracking not yet implemented |\\n\\n## ⚠️ MRI Breakdown\\n\\n| Component | Risk Share | Points | Count |\\n|-----------|------------|--------|-------|\\n| Drops | 0% | 0 | 0 |\\n| Renames Without Uid | 0% | 0 | 0 |\\n| Add Not Null Without Default | 0% | 0 | 0 |\\n| Non Concurrent Indexes | 0% | 0 | 0 |\\n\\n## 📊 The Weight of Evidence\\n\\n\\\"Observe, Watson, how not all features carry equal importance...\\\"\\n\\n| Element | Weight | Status | Evidence | Strength | Deduction |\\n|---------|--------|--------|----------|----------|-----------|\\n\\n## 🚪 Security & Performance Gates\\n\\n\\\"Elementary security measures, Watson...\\\"\\n\\n| Gate | Status | Evidence | Holmes's Ruling |\\n|------|--------|----------|-----------------|\\n| Migration Risk | ✅ | MRI: 0.0% | \\\"Trivial risk\\\" |\\n| Test Coverage | ⚠️ | TCI: 0.0% | \\\"Theatrical tests!\\\" |\\n| Sensitive Fields | ✅ | 0 fields | \\\"All secured\\\" |\\n| Evidence Quality | ⛔ | 0 exact · 0 whole-file · 0 coarse | \\\"No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\\\" |\\n\\n## 📋 The Verdict\\n\\n⛔ **YOU SHALL NOT PASS**\\n\\\"Critical evidence is missing! Return to your laboratory!\\\"\\n\\nSigned and sealed,\\n- S. Holmes, Consulting Detective\\n\\n[END OF INVESTIGATION FOR COMMIT fb848c2]\\n\\n## 🧵 Command Run\\n\\n- Run ID: run-mpgunmhj-4g875p\\n- Transmutation: holmes-investigate\\n- Command: investigate\\n- Status: completed\\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n

🩺 Dr. WATSON full report (click to expand)

\\n\\n### 🩺 Dr. Watson's Independent Verification Report\\n\\n_Medical Examination of Evidence_\\n\\n- Examination Date: 2026-05-22T11:42:29.269Z\\n- Patient SHA: fb848c20c469872363841f41eaa3f23fc2bea599\\n\\n## 🔬 Citation Verification\\n\\n\\\"Let me examine each piece of evidence independently...\\\"\\n\\n- **Citations Examined**: 0\\n- **Verified**: 0 ✅\\n- **Failed**: 0 ❌\\n- **Unable to Verify**: 0\\n- **Exact Subrange Citations**: 0\\n- **Whole-file Citations**: 0\\n- **Coarse Citations**: 0\\n- **Evidence Trust**: missing\\n- **Trust Note**: No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\\n\\n**Verification Rate**: 0.0%\\n\\n## 📊 Mathematical Verification\\n\\n\\\"I shall recalculate Holmes's arithmetic...\\\"\\n\\nHolmes claimed SCS: 0.0%\\nWatson calculates: 0.0%\\nDifference: ✅ Negligible\\n\\n## 🔍 Consistency Analysis\\n\\n\\\"Checking for contradictions in Holmes's deductions...\\\"\\n\\n⚠️ Low migration risk claimed but schema incomplete\\n\\n## 🩺 Dr. Watson's Medical Opinion\\n\\n**VERIFICATION: CONCERNS NOTED** ⚠️\\n\\n\\\"While Holmes's methods are generally sound, I have noted some\\\"\\n\\\"discrepancies that warrant further investigation. No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\\\"\\n\\nRespectfully submitted,\\n- Dr. J. Watson, M.D.\\n Medical Examiner & Verification Specialist\\n\\n## 🧵 Command Run\\n\\n- Run ID: run-mpguoakr-ittqm1\\n- Transmutation: watson-verify\\n- Command: verify\\n- Status: completed\\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n

🔮 Professor MORIARTY full report (click to expand)

\\n\\n### 🧠 Professor Moriarty's Temporal Predictions\\n\\n_The Mathematics of Inevitability_\\n\\n- Analysis Date: 2026-05-22T11:43:11.178Z\\n\\n## 🔮 Current State\\n\\n**SCS**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n**TCI**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n**MRI**: 0.0% risk\\n**Evidence Trust**: missing\\n\\n## 📈 Velocity Analysis\\n\\n**SCS Velocity**: +0.00%/day\\n**Git Activity (window)**: 24h · commits 16 (1 relevant) · ~16.00 commits/day\\n↳ Magnitude: ~313 relevant LOC/day across ~6.0 files/day\\n**Activity Index**: 25 / 100 (PR 0, Window 62)\\n**Blended Velocity**: +0.15%/day\\n**Commit Size Burstiness**: 0 / 100 (higher = more uneven commit sizes)\\n⚠️ **PLATEAU DETECTED** - Low SCS movement and low recent Git activity.\\n\\n## ⏰ Completion Predictions\\n\\n**ETA**: Cannot predict (insufficient velocity)\\n\\n\\\"At current velocity, completion is... improbable.\\\"\\n\\n## ⚠️ Warnings\\n\\n- Evidence trust is missing; No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\\n\\n## 🧪 Readiness EXPLAIN\\n\\n- SCS ≥ 80% → FAIL ❌ (actual 0.0%)\\n- TCI ≥ 70% → FAIL ❌ (actual 0.0%)\\n- MRI ≤ 40% → PASS ✅ (actual 0.0%)\\n- CI Stability ≥ 90% (branch main) → FAIL ❌ (actual 86% over ~168h)\\n- Evidence Trust ≥ moderate → FAIL ❌ (actual missing) — No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\\n- Delivery context (last 168h): 0 issues closed · 3 PRs merged (informational, not gating)\\n\\n_Signals blend:_ SCS velocity (70%) + Git activity (30%, branch-first). Activity only suppresses false plateaus; it never inflates readiness.\\n\\n## 📊 Historical Trajectory\\n\\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\\n\\n*\\\"Every problem becomes elementary when reduced to mathematics\\\"*\\n— Professor Moriarty\\n\\n## 🧵 Command Run\\n\\n- Run ID: run-mpgup6x4-zvwewa\\n- Transmutation: moriarty-predict\\n- Command: predict\\n- Status: completed\\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n_Machine-readable reports:_ holmes-report.json · watson-report.json · moriarty-report.json (see workflow artifacts).\\n\\n---\\n\\n*Filed at 221B Repository Street*\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"@codex Self-review findings for PR #514. Please confirm and address before merge.\\n\\n| Severity | File / Lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended Mitigation Prompt |\\n| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |\\n| High | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:129-133` | Logical bug / hash-contract mismatch | The sentinel computes `rustL1Hash` from `canonicalizeJSON(rustIr)`, including any top-level `metadata`. Rust's real registry hash path strips metadata first in `crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs:158-164`, and this PR's docs reiterate semantic/hash normalization in `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:129-131`. A Rust L1 object with metadata will make `rustCommandHashMatches` false even when the Rust CLI is correct. | Update `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs` so the Rust L1 semantic hash uses a normalized clone with top-level `metadata` removed before `canonicalizeJSON`. Use that same semantic hash for command-hash and tracked-hash comparisons. Add a Bats regression where the fake Rust lowerer emits top-level metadata and the fake `schema hash` omits it; the sentinel should pass. |\\n| Medium | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:140-152` plus `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:47-56` | Evidence bundle / implementation contract mismatch | The design says each fixture records legacy projected semantic bytes and Rust projected semantic bytes. The script computes `legacyBytes` and `rustBytes` at lines 124-125 but discards them; JSON reports only hashes/status. That weakens the stated audit bundle and makes the docs overclaim the implementation. | Either include canonical projected bytes in the JSON report, or narrow the design/docs to say the command records hashes and mismatch paths rather than bytes. Prefer adding bytes only to `--json` output and keeping text output concise. |\\n\\nSummary: 2 findings total: 1 High, 1 Medium. No Critical findings found in this pass.\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Strip top-level metadata before computing Rust semantic hash**\\n\\nCompute `rustL1Hash` from a normalized Rust IR that removes top-level `metadata` first, otherwise this sentinel can report false `rust-command-hash-mismatch` and `tracked-rust-hash-mismatch` failures whenever `schema lower` includes metadata. Rust’s canonical registry hash path explicitly clears metadata before hashing (`crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs`), but this code hashes the raw `rustIr`, so parity can fail even when `wesley schema hash` is correct.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Emit projected semantic bytes in JSON parity report**\\n\\nThe comparator contract says each fixture records projected semantic bytes for both lowerers, but the implementation computes `legacyBytes`/`rustBytes` only for internal comparison and drops them from the report object. That weakens reproducible audit evidence in `--json` output and leaves the documented evidence bundle incomplete unless docs are narrowed to hashes-only output.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":125}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"\\n### 💡 Codex Review\\n\\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\\n\\n**Reviewed commit:** `683152a26b`\\n \\n\\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\\n
\\n\\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\\n- Open a pull request for review\\n- Mark a draft as ready\\n- Comment \\\"@codex review\\\".\\n\\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \\\"@codex address that feedback\\\".\\n \\n

\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}","text_elements",[],{"_378":487,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":488,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":320,"_90":386},[489],{"_45":483,"_90":490},"input_text",{"_378":492,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":493,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":320,"_90":386},[494,495],{"_45":497,"_90":490},{"_45":496,"_90":490},"\n /workspace/wesley\n bash\n 2026-05-22\n Etc/UTC\n","# AGENTS.md instructions for /workspace/wesley\n\n\n# AGENTS\n\nThis guide is for AI agents and human operators recovering context in the Wesley repository.\n\n## Git Rules\n\n- **NEVER** amend commits.\n- **NEVER** rebase or force-push.\n- **NEVER** push to `main` without explicit permission.\n- Always use standard commits and regular pushes.\n\n## Documentation & Planning Map\n\nDo not audit the repository by recursively walking the filesystem. Follow the authoritative manifests:\n\n### 1. The Entrance\n- **`README.md`**: Public front door, core value prop, and quick start.\n- **`docs/GUIDE.md`**: Orientation, fast path, and system orchestration.\n\n### 2. The Bedrock\n- **`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`**: Authoritative structural reference (Base Platform, Modules, Pipeline).\n- **`docs/VISION.md`**: Core tenets and the \"Trustworthy Change\" mission.\n- **`docs/METHOD.md`**: Repo work doctrine (Backlog lanes, Cycle loop).\n\n### 3. The Direction\n- **`docs/BEARING.md`**: Current execution gravity and active tensions.\n- **`docs/design/README.md`**: Active design packets and structural doctrine.\n- **`docs/method/backlog/`**: The active source of truth for pending work.\n\n### 4. The Proof\n- **`CHANGELOG.md`**: Historical truth of merged behavior.\n- **`docs/audit/`**: Structural health and due diligence reports.\n\n## Context Recovery Protocol\n\nWhen starting a new session or recovering from context loss:\n\n1. **Read `docs/BEARING.md`** to find the current execution gravity.\n2. **Read `docs/METHOD.md`** to understand the work doctrine.\n3. **Check `docs/method/backlog/asap/`** for imminent work.\n4. **Check `git log -n 5` and `git status`** to verify the current branch state.\n\n## End of Turn Checklist\n\nAfter altering files:\n\n1. **Verify Truth**: Ensure documentation is updated if behavior or structure changed.\n2. **Log Debt**: Add follow-on backlog items to `bad-code/` or `cool-ideas/`.\n3. **Commit**: Use focused, conventional commit messages. Propose a draft before executing.\n4. **Validate**: Run `pnpm run preflight`.\n\n---\n**The goal is inevitably. Every feature is defined by its tests.**\n\n",{"_378":499,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":500,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":501,"_90":386},[502,503],"developer",{"_45":505,"_90":490},{"_45":504,"_90":490},"\n## Skills\nA skill is a set of local instructions to follow that is stored in a `SKILL.md` file. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and file path so you can open the source for full instructions when using a specific skill.\n### Available skills\n- imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)\n- openai-docs: Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools, use bundled references only as helper context, and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)\n- plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional plugin folders/files, and baseline placeholders you can edit before publishing or testing. Use when Codex needs to create a new local plugin, add optional plugin structure, or generate or update repo-root `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` entries for plugin ordering and availability metadata. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/plugin-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-creator: Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-installer: Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos). (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/SKILL.md)\n### How to use skills\n- Discovery: The list above is the skills available in this session (name + description + file path). Skill bodies live on disk at the listed paths.\n- Trigger rules: If the user names a skill (with `$SkillName` or plain text) OR the task clearly matches a skill's description shown above, you must use that skill for that turn. Multiple mentions mean use them all. Do not carry skills across turns unless re-mentioned.\n- Missing/blocked: If a named skill isn't in the list or the path can't be read, say so briefly and continue with the best fallback.\n- How to use a skill (progressive disclosure):\n 1) After deciding to use a skill, open its `SKILL.md`. Read only enough to follow the workflow.\n 2) When `SKILL.md` references relative paths (e.g., `scripts/foo.py`), resolve them relative to the skill directory listed above first, and only consider other paths if needed.\n 3) If `SKILL.md` points to extra folders such as `references/`, load only the specific files needed for the request; don't bulk-load everything.\n 4) If `scripts/` exist, prefer running or patching them instead of retyping large code blocks.\n 5) If `assets/` or templates exist, reuse them instead of recreating from scratch.\n- Coordination and sequencing:\n - If multiple skills apply, choose the minimal set that covers the request and state the order you'll use them.\n - Announce which skill(s) you're using and why (one short line). If you skip an obvious skill, say why.\n- Context hygiene:\n - Keep context small: summarize long sections instead of pasting them; only load extra files when needed.\n - Avoid deep reference-chasing: prefer opening only files directly linked from `SKILL.md` unless you're blocked.\n - When variants exist (frameworks, providers, domains), pick only the relevant reference file(s) and note that choice.\n- Safety and fallback: If a skill can't be applied cleanly (missing files, unclear instructions), state the issue, pick the next-best approach, and continue.\n","\nFilesystem sandboxing defines which files can be read or written. `sandbox_mode` is `danger-full-access`: No filesystem sandboxing - all commands are permitted. Network access is enabled.\nApproval policy is currently never. Do not provide the `sandbox_permissions` for any reason, commands will be rejected.\n","turn/started",{"_359":360,"_85":508},{"_101":-5,"_41":366,"_367":509,"_369":370,"_371":510},[],"inProgress",{"_371":512,"_359":360},{"_513":514,"_90":515},"activeFlags",[],"active","thread/started",{"_518":519},"thread",{"_520":-5,"_521":-5,"_522":523,"_524":370,"_422":423,"_525":15,"_526":-5,"_527":-5,"_41":360,"_528":529,"_179":-5,"_159":530,"_531":207,"_427":532,"_371":533,"_75":534,"_535":370},"agentNickname","agentRole","cliVersion","0.124.0","createdAt","ephemeral","forkedFromId","gitInfo","modelProvider","openai","/opt/codex/sessions/2026/05/22/rollout-2026-05-22T12-00-15-019e4f8e-bfb5-76b1-8642-6c51085c694b.jsonl","preview","vscode",{"_90":375},[],"updatedAt",[],"messages",[539],{"_41":540,"_541":542,"_543":544,"_545":544,"_381":546,"_371":547,"_383":-5,"_548":31,"_549":550,"_551":552,"_553":-5},"392150d4-0b7f-4852-a676-6d3dbad5f7fa","author",{"_94":320,"_179":-5,"_549":562},"create_time",1779451215.035146,"update_time",{"_558":45,"_559":560},"finished_successfully","weight","metadata",{"_554":555},"recipient","all","channel","l1239dk1",{"_556":557},"inline_comments",[],"content_type","parts",[561],"@codex Resolved the self-review findings in follow-up commit `5ae0e96c` (`fix(ir): normalize parity sentinel evidence`).\n\n| Finding | Resolution | Regression Coverage |\n| :--- | :--- | :--- |\n| Rust hash comparison included top-level metadata | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs` now computes the Rust L1 semantic hash from a clone with top-level `metadata` removed before canonical JSON hashing, matching the Rust `compute_registry_hash` contract. | `test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats` now covers a fake Rust lowerer that emits metadata while `schema hash` strips it; the sentinel must pass. |\n| JSON evidence omitted projected bytes promised by design | JSON fixture reports now include canonical `legacyBytes` and `rustBytes` alongside hashes and mismatch data. | The passing projection test asserts both byte fields are present in `--json` output. |\n\nValidation after the fix:\n\n- `pnpm exec eslint scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs scripts/ir-parity-projection.mjs --max-warnings=0`\n- `BATS_LIB_PATH=packages/wesley-cli/test bats -t test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats`\n- `pnpm parity:ir`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-whitespace`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-truth`\n- `git diff --check`\n- `pnpm run preflight`\n- `bash scripts/smoke/repo-bats-prepush.sh`\n- `git push` pre-push hook reran repository preflight and repo Bats smoke suite successfully\nfeat(ir): add parity projection sentinel\n\n## Summary\n\n- Add `pnpm parity:ir` for the explicit `js-table-vs-rust-table.v0` sentinel corpus.\n- Add projection tooling that compares legacy JS table IR against Rust L1 table facts, including projected hash comparison, first mismatch paths, Rust command hash checks, and tracked L1 hash checks.\n- Add Bats coverage, pre-push smoke inclusion, docs/changelog updates, and a bad-code backlog item for the existing missing Prettier format-check toolchain.\n\n## Validation\n\n- `pnpm exec eslint scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs scripts/ir-parity-projection.mjs --max-warnings=0`\n- `BATS_LIB_PATH=packages/wesley-cli/test bats -t test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats`\n- `pnpm parity:ir`\n- `pnpm run lint`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-whitespace`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-truth`\n- `pnpm run preflight`\n- `bash scripts/smoke/repo-bats-prepush.sh`\n- `git push` pre-push hook reran repository preflight and repo Bats smoke suite successfully\n\n## Known Gap\n\n- `pnpm run format:check` currently fails before checking files because `prettier` is not installed in the workspace. This PR logs that as `docs/method/backlog/bad-code/DX_format-check-toolchain-gap.md` instead of changing formatter policy inside the parity slice.\n\n\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Rate limit exceeded\n> \n> `@flyingrobots` has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait **36 minutes and 10 seconds** before requesting another review.\n> \n> You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\n> \n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\n> \n>

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\n> \n> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.\n> \n> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n> \n> **Review profile**: CHILL\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `92503d3b-8029-499a-8739-a93d11398f57`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b2c6bedb280e674bb7a2840cb0cbf606621fce5 and 5ae0e96c35f71832b54379ff65f6a5e5e92c4a13.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\n> \n> * `CHANGELOG.md`\n> * `docs/BEARING.md`\n> * `docs/design/0009-rust-core-and-wasm-capability-abi/phase-0-ir-truth-manifest.md`\n> * `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md`\n> * `docs/method/backlog/bad-code/DX_format-check-toolchain-gap.md`\n> * `docs/method/backlog/bad-code/README.md`\n> * `package.json`\n> * `scripts/README.md`\n> * `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs`\n> * `scripts/ir-parity-projection.mjs`\n> * `scripts/smoke/repo-bats-prepush.sh`\n> * `test/README.md`\n> * `test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n\n\n\n\n\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\n\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\n\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `codex/parity-projection-crosswalk`\n\n

\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n---\n\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/wesley&utm_content=514)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\n\n

❤️ Share

\n\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\n\n

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n\n\n\n# 🔍 The Case of Pull Request #514\n\n## Plain-English Readout\n\n- **Holmes (evidence investigation)**: Holmes says this change should not ship in its current state. Main reasons: No evidence citations were available for trust analysis; test evidence is incomplete; schema coverage is incomplete.\n- **Watson (independent verification)**: Watson found verification concerns. Most important concern: Low migration risk claimed but schema incomplete.\n- **Moriarty (trend forecast)**: Moriarty sees progress as stalled right now, so forecast confidence is limited.\n\n## Suggested next actions\n\n1. Tighten citations so the report points to exact lines instead of whole files or coarse references.\n2. Resolve Watson’s verification concerns before trusting the Holmes verdict as final.\n3. Treat the readiness forecast as stalled until new evidence or real progress moves the trend again.\n4. Add or strengthen tests for the schema elements and operations HOLMES flagged as weakly proven.\n\n

📚 Glossary (what the Holmes terms mean)

\n\n- **HOLMES**: Wesley’s main evidence investigation. It decides whether the cited proof is strong enough to justify shipping this commit.\n- **WATSON**: An independent verification pass. It checks Holmes’s citations and score math instead of trusting them blindly.\n- **MORIARTY**: A readiness forecast over time. It is advisory trend analysis, not the release gate itself.\n- **Schema coverage score (SCS)**: How much of the schema has direct supporting evidence across generated artifacts and cited proof.\n- **Test confidence index (TCI)**: How much test evidence exists for constraints, policies, relationships, and operations.\n- **Migration risk index (MRI)**: How risky the schema change is to roll out. Lower is better.\n- **Evidence trust**: Whether the report is backed by exact citations, whole-file citations, or coarse references. Weak trust means the claim may be directionally right but not specific enough to trust blindly.\n- **Citation quality**: A count of exact line-span citations versus whole-file or coarse references.\n- **ELEMENTARY**: Ready to ship based on the current evidence.\n- **REQUIRES INVESTIGATION**: More work or review is needed before shipping.\n- **YOU SHALL NOT PASS**: Do not ship this change in its current state.\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES full report (click to expand)

\n\n### 🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES Investigation\n\n- Generated: 2026-05-22T11:41:19.263Z\n- Commit SHA: fb848c20c469872363841f41eaa3f23fc2bea599\n- Bundle Version: 2.0.0\n\n> ⚠️ Evidence valid only for commit `fb848c2`\n\n## 🔍 Executive Deduction\n\n\"Watson, after careful examination of the evidence, I deduce...\"\n\n**Weighted Completion**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n**Scores**: SCS 0.0% · TCI 0.0% · MRI 0.0%\n**Verification Status**: 0 claims verified\n**Citation Quality**: 0 exact · 0 whole-file · 0 coarse\n**Evidence Trust**: missing\n**Ship Verdict**: YOU SHALL NOT PASS\n\n## 🧩 SCS Breakdown\n\n| Component | Score | Coverage |\n|-----------|-------|----------|\n| Sql | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\n| Types | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\n| Validation | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\n| Tests | 0.0% | 0.00/154.00 |\n\n## 🧪 TCI Breakdown\n\n| Component | Score | Coverage | Note |\n|-----------|-------|----------|------|\n| Unit Constraints | 0.0% | 0/104 | N/A |\n| Unit Rls | 0.0% | — | N/A |\n| Integration Relations | 0.0% | 0/3 | N/A |\n| E2e Ops | N/A | — | Query operation test tracking not yet implemented |\n\n## ⚠️ MRI Breakdown\n\n| Component | Risk Share | Points | Count |\n|-----------|------------|--------|-------|\n| Drops | 0% | 0 | 0 |\n| Renames Without Uid | 0% | 0 | 0 |\n| Add Not Null Without Default | 0% | 0 | 0 |\n| Non Concurrent Indexes | 0% | 0 | 0 |\n\n## 📊 The Weight of Evidence\n\n\"Observe, Watson, how not all features carry equal importance...\"\n\n| Element | Weight | Status | Evidence | Strength | Deduction |\n|---------|--------|--------|----------|----------|-----------|\n\n## 🚪 Security & Performance Gates\n\n\"Elementary security measures, Watson...\"\n\n| Gate | Status | Evidence | Holmes's Ruling |\n|------|--------|----------|-----------------|\n| Migration Risk | ✅ | MRI: 0.0% | \"Trivial risk\" |\n| Test Coverage | ⚠️ | TCI: 0.0% | \"Theatrical tests!\" |\n| Sensitive Fields | ✅ | 0 fields | \"All secured\" |\n| Evidence Quality | ⛔ | 0 exact · 0 whole-file · 0 coarse | \"No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\" |\n\n## 📋 The Verdict\n\n⛔ **YOU SHALL NOT PASS**\n\"Critical evidence is missing! Return to your laboratory!\"\n\nSigned and sealed,\n- S. Holmes, Consulting Detective\n\n[END OF INVESTIGATION FOR COMMIT fb848c2]\n\n## 🧵 Command Run\n\n- Run ID: run-mpgunmhj-4g875p\n- Transmutation: holmes-investigate\n- Command: investigate\n- Status: completed\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

🩺 Dr. WATSON full report (click to expand)

\n\n### 🩺 Dr. Watson's Independent Verification Report\n\n_Medical Examination of Evidence_\n\n- Examination Date: 2026-05-22T11:42:29.269Z\n- Patient SHA: fb848c20c469872363841f41eaa3f23fc2bea599\n\n## 🔬 Citation Verification\n\n\"Let me examine each piece of evidence independently...\"\n\n- **Citations Examined**: 0\n- **Verified**: 0 ✅\n- **Failed**: 0 ❌\n- **Unable to Verify**: 0\n- **Exact Subrange Citations**: 0\n- **Whole-file Citations**: 0\n- **Coarse Citations**: 0\n- **Evidence Trust**: missing\n- **Trust Note**: No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\n\n**Verification Rate**: 0.0%\n\n## 📊 Mathematical Verification\n\n\"I shall recalculate Holmes's arithmetic...\"\n\nHolmes claimed SCS: 0.0%\nWatson calculates: 0.0%\nDifference: ✅ Negligible\n\n## 🔍 Consistency Analysis\n\n\"Checking for contradictions in Holmes's deductions...\"\n\n⚠️ Low migration risk claimed but schema incomplete\n\n## 🩺 Dr. Watson's Medical Opinion\n\n**VERIFICATION: CONCERNS NOTED** ⚠️\n\n\"While Holmes's methods are generally sound, I have noted some\"\n\"discrepancies that warrant further investigation. No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\"\n\nRespectfully submitted,\n- Dr. J. Watson, M.D.\n Medical Examiner & Verification Specialist\n\n## 🧵 Command Run\n\n- Run ID: run-mpguoakr-ittqm1\n- Transmutation: watson-verify\n- Command: verify\n- Status: completed\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

🔮 Professor MORIARTY full report (click to expand)

\n\n### 🧠 Professor Moriarty's Temporal Predictions\n\n_The Mathematics of Inevitability_\n\n- Analysis Date: 2026-05-22T11:43:11.178Z\n\n## 🔮 Current State\n\n**SCS**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n**TCI**: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n**MRI**: 0.0% risk\n**Evidence Trust**: missing\n\n## 📈 Velocity Analysis\n\n**SCS Velocity**: +0.00%/day\n**Git Activity (window)**: 24h · commits 16 (1 relevant) · ~16.00 commits/day\n↳ Magnitude: ~313 relevant LOC/day across ~6.0 files/day\n**Activity Index**: 25 / 100 (PR 0, Window 62)\n**Blended Velocity**: +0.15%/day\n**Commit Size Burstiness**: 0 / 100 (higher = more uneven commit sizes)\n⚠️ **PLATEAU DETECTED** - Low SCS movement and low recent Git activity.\n\n## ⏰ Completion Predictions\n\n**ETA**: Cannot predict (insufficient velocity)\n\n\"At current velocity, completion is... improbable.\"\n\n## ⚠️ Warnings\n\n- Evidence trust is missing; No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\n\n## 🧪 Readiness EXPLAIN\n\n- SCS ≥ 80% → FAIL ❌ (actual 0.0%)\n- TCI ≥ 70% → FAIL ❌ (actual 0.0%)\n- MRI ≤ 40% → PASS ✅ (actual 0.0%)\n- CI Stability ≥ 90% (branch main) → FAIL ❌ (actual 86% over ~168h)\n- Evidence Trust ≥ moderate → FAIL ❌ (actual missing) — No evidence citations were available for trust analysis.\n- Delivery context (last 168h): 0 issues closed · 3 PRs merged (informational, not gating)\n\n_Signals blend:_ SCS velocity (70%) + Git activity (30%, branch-first). Activity only suppresses false plateaus; it never inflates readiness.\n\n## 📊 Historical Trajectory\n\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n05-22: ░░░░░░░░░░ 0.0%\n\n*\"Every problem becomes elementary when reduced to mathematics\"*\n— Professor Moriarty\n\n## 🧵 Command Run\n\n- Run ID: run-mpgup6x4-zvwewa\n- Transmutation: moriarty-predict\n- Command: predict\n- Status: completed\n- Ledger: /home/runner/work/wesley/wesley/test/fixtures/examples/.wesley-cache/ledger\n\n

\n\n---\n\n_Machine-readable reports:_ holmes-report.json · watson-report.json · moriarty-report.json (see workflow artifacts).\n\n---\n\n*Filed at 221B Repository Street*\n\n@codex Self-review findings for PR #514. Please confirm and address before merge.\n\n| Severity | File / Lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended Mitigation Prompt |\n| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |\n| High | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:129-133` | Logical bug / hash-contract mismatch | The sentinel computes `rustL1Hash` from `canonicalizeJSON(rustIr)`, including any top-level `metadata`. Rust's real registry hash path strips metadata first in `crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs:158-164`, and this PR's docs reiterate semantic/hash normalization in `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:129-131`. A Rust L1 object with metadata will make `rustCommandHashMatches` false even when the Rust CLI is correct. | Update `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs` so the Rust L1 semantic hash uses a normalized clone with top-level `metadata` removed before `canonicalizeJSON`. Use that same semantic hash for command-hash and tracked-hash comparisons. Add a Bats regression where the fake Rust lowerer emits top-level metadata and the fake `schema hash` omits it; the sentinel should pass. |\n| Medium | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:140-152` plus `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:47-56` | Evidence bundle / implementation contract mismatch | The design says each fixture records legacy projected semantic bytes and Rust projected semantic bytes. The script computes `legacyBytes` and `rustBytes` at lines 124-125 but discards them; JSON reports only hashes/status. That weakens the stated audit bundle and makes the docs overclaim the implementation. | Either include canonical projected bytes in the JSON report, or narrow the design/docs to say the command records hashes and mismatch paths rather than bytes. Prefer adding bytes only to `--json` output and keeping text output concise. |\n\nSummary: 2 findings total: 1 High, 1 Medium. No Critical findings found in this pass.\n\n**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Strip top-level metadata before computing Rust semantic hash**\n\nCompute `rustL1Hash` from a normalized Rust IR that removes top-level `metadata` first, otherwise this sentinel can report false `rust-command-hash-mismatch` and `tracked-rust-hash-mismatch` failures whenever `schema lower` includes metadata. Rust’s canonical registry hash path explicitly clears metadata before hashing (`crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs`), but this code hashes the raw `rustIr`, so parity can fail even when `wesley schema hash` is correct.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Emit projected semantic bytes in JSON parity report**\n\nThe comparator contract says each fixture records projected semantic bytes for both lowerers, but the implementation computes `legacyBytes`/`rustBytes` only for internal comparison and drops them from the report object. That weakens reproducible audit evidence in `--json` output and leaves the documented evidence bundle incomplete unless docs are narrowed to hashes-only output.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `683152a26b`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n
\n\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\n- Open a pull request for review\n- Mark a draft as ready\n- Comment \"@codex review\".\n\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\n\n\n\n\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \"@codex address that feedback\".\n \n

",{},"created",1779451242.377032,"Completing the task","event_type","info",{"_90":386,"_94":91,"_381":623},{"_90":570,"_571":572},"partial_repo_snapshot","files",[573],{"_159":574,"_575":-5,"_576":577,"_578":-5},"AGENTS.md","contents","line_range_contents",[579],"missing_reason",{"_580":581,"_582":583,"_381":584,"_585":57},"line_range_start",1,"line_range_end",53,[586,207,587,207,588,207,589,590,591,592,207,593,207,594,207,595,596,597,207,598,599,600,601,207,602,603,604,605,207,606,607,608,207,609,207,610,207,611,612,613,614,207,615,207,616,207,617,618,619,620,207,621,622],"contains_end_of_file","# AGENTS","This guide is for AI agents and human operators recovering context in the Wesley repository.","## Git Rules","- **NEVER** amend commits.","- **NEVER** rebase or force-push.","- **NEVER** push to `main` without explicit permission.","- Always use standard commits and regular pushes.","## Documentation & Planning Map","Do not audit the repository by recursively walking the filesystem. Follow the authoritative manifests:","### 1. The Entrance","- **`README.md`**: Public front door, core value prop, and quick start.","- **`docs/GUIDE.md`**: Orientation, fast path, and system orchestration.","### 2. The Bedrock","- **`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`**: Authoritative structural reference (Base Platform, Modules, Pipeline).","- **`docs/VISION.md`**: Core tenets and the \"Trustworthy Change\" mission.","- **`docs/METHOD.md`**: Repo work doctrine (Backlog lanes, Cycle loop).","### 3. The Direction","- **`docs/BEARING.md`**: Current execution gravity and active tensions.","- **`docs/design/README.md`**: Active design packets and structural doctrine.","- **`docs/method/backlog/`**: The active source of truth for pending work.","### 4. The Proof","- **`CHANGELOG.md`**: Historical truth of merged behavior.","- **`docs/audit/`**: Structural health and due diligence reports.","## Context Recovery Protocol","When starting a new session or recovering from context loss:","1. **Read `docs/BEARING.md`** to find the current execution gravity.","2. **Read `docs/METHOD.md`** to understand the work doctrine.","3. **Check `docs/method/backlog/asap/`** for imminent work.","4. **Check `git log -n 5` and `git status`** to verify the current branch state.","## End of Turn Checklist","After altering files:","1. **Verify Truth**: Ensure documentation is updated if behavior or structure changed.","2. **Log Debt**: Add follow-on backlog items to `bad-code/` or `cool-ideas/`.","3. **Commit**: Use focused, conventional commit messages. Propose a draft before executing.","4. **Validate**: Run `pnpm run preflight`.","---","**The goal is inevitably. Every feature is defined by its tests.**",[624,625,626,627,628],{"_558":45,"_45":636},{"_558":630,"_159":574,"_580":634,"_582":635},{"_558":45,"_45":633},{"_558":630,"_159":574,"_580":631,"_582":632},{"_558":45,"_45":629},"\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `cd /workspace/wesley && rg --files -g 'AGENTS.md'`\n* ✅ `cd /workspace/wesley && cat AGENTS.md && echo '---' && cat docs/BEARING.md >/tmp/b && head -n 40 /tmp/b && echo '---' && head -n 60 docs/METHOD.md && echo '---' && rg --files docs/method/backlog/asap && echo '---' && git log -n 5 --oneline && echo '---' && git status --short`","repo_file_citation",5,9,"\n* Because no new edits were required, I did **not** create a new commit and did **not** open a follow-up PR via `make_pr` (to stay consistent with your workflow constraints). ",36,46,"### Summary\n* Reviewed the trigger, PR context, and branch state. The follow-up commit `5ae0e96` is already present at `HEAD`, and the working tree is clean, so there are no additional code changes for me to apply in this pass. ",{"_90":320,"_41":82,"_94":320,"_639":640,"_641":642,"_643":644,"_130":-5,"_117":645},[81],"input_items",[663,664,665,666,667,668,669,670],"external_post_config",{"_646":647,"_260":194,"_648":300,"_271":-5,"_649":254,"_650":-5,"_651":652,"_653":654,"_655":-5,"_656":-5,"_657":658,"_659":15,"_660":57,"_661":52,"_662":15},"user_model_slug","slug",1779451206.615633,"installation_id",89912914,"pr_number","repo_id","review_trigger","comment_id",4518452249,"comment_type","issue","pr_write_guard_token","pending_pr_reaction_id","pending_comment_reaction_id",360616845,"comment_if_no_findings","comment_on_error","share_url","is_parallel_review",{"_90":386,"_94":320,"_381":686},{"_307":308,"_309":310,"_683":314,"_684":127,"_316":-5,"_90":685},{"_90":671,"_309":682,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":681,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":680,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":679,"_159":676,"_673":677,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":675,"_159":676,"_673":677,"_674":678},{"_90":671,"_309":672,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},"pull_request_comment","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `683152a26b`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","side","line","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Emit projected semantic bytes in JSON parity report**\n\nThe comparator contract says each fixture records projected semantic bytes for both lowerers, but the implementation computes `legacyBytes`/`rustBytes` only for internal comparison and drops them from the report object. That weakens reproducible audit evidence in `--json` output and leaves the documented evidence bundle incomplete unless docs are narrowed to hashes-only output.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs","RIGHT",125,"**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Strip top-level metadata before computing Rust semantic hash**\n\nCompute `rustL1Hash` from a normalized Rust IR that removes top-level `metadata` first, otherwise this sentinel can report false `rust-command-hash-mismatch` and `tracked-rust-hash-mismatch` failures whenever `schema lower` includes metadata. Rust’s canonical registry hash path explicitly clears metadata before hashing (`crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs`), but this code hashes the raw `rustIr`, so parity can fail even when `wesley schema hash` is correct.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","@codex Self-review findings for PR #514. Please confirm and address before merge.\n\n| Severity | File / Lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended Mitigation Prompt |\n| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |\n| High | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:129-133` | Logical bug / hash-contract mismatch | The sentinel computes `rustL1Hash` from `canonicalizeJSON(rustIr)`, including any top-level `metadata`. Rust's real registry hash path strips metadata first in `crates/wesley-core/src/domain/ir.rs:158-164`, and this PR's docs reiterate semantic/hash normalization in `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:129-131`. A Rust L1 object with metadata will make `rustCommandHashMatches` false even when the Rust CLI is correct. | Update `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs` so the Rust L1 semantic hash uses a normalized clone with top-level `metadata` removed before `canonicalizeJSON`. Use that same semantic hash for command-hash and tracked-hash comparisons. Add a Bats regression where the fake Rust lowerer emits top-level metadata and the fake `schema hash` omits it; the sentinel should pass. |\n| Medium | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs:140-152` plus `docs/design/0013-rust-ir-parity-sentinel/rust-ir-parity-sentinel.md:47-56` | Evidence bundle / implementation contract mismatch | The design says each fixture records legacy projected semantic bytes and Rust projected semantic bytes. The script computes `legacyBytes` and `rustBytes` at lines 124-125 but discards them; JSON reports only hashes/status. That weakens the stated audit bundle and makes the docs overclaim the implementation. | Either include canonical projected bytes in the JSON report, or narrow the design/docs to say the command records hashes and mismatch paths rather than bytes. Prefer adding bytes only to `--json` output and keeping text output concise. |\n\nSummary: 2 findings total: 1 High, 1 Medium. No Critical findings found in this pass.\n","\n\n# 🔍 The Case of Pull Request #514\n\n## Plain-English Readout\n\n- **Holmes (evidence investigation)**: Holmes says this change should not ship in its current state. Main reasons: No evidence citations were available for trust analysis; test evidence is incomplete; schema coverage is incomplete.\n- **Watson (independent verification)**: Watson found verification concerns. Most important concern: Low migration risk claimed but schema incomplete.\n- **Moriarty (trend forecast)**: Moriarty sees progress as stalled right now, so forecast confidence is limited.\n\n## Suggested next actions\n\n1. Tighten citations so the report points to exact lines instead of whole files or coarse references.\n2. Resolve Watson’s verification concerns before trusting the Holmes verdict as final.\n3. Treat the readiness forecast as stalled until new evidence or real progress moves the trend again.\n4. Add or strengthen tests for the schema elements and operations HOLMES flagged as weakly proven.\n\n

📚 Glossary (what the Holmes terms mean)

\n\n---\n\n

🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES full report (click to expand)

\n\n---\n\n

🩺 Dr. WATSON full report (click to expand)

\n\n---\n\n

🔮 Professor MORIARTY full report (click to expand)

\n\n---\n\n_Machine-readable reports:_ holmes-report.json · watson-report.json · moriarty-report.json (see workflow artifacts).\n\n---\n\n*Filed at 221B Repository Street*\n","\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Rate limit exceeded\n> \n> `@flyingrobots` has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait **36 minutes and 10 seconds** before requesting another review.\n> \n> You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n> \n> **Review profile**: CHILL\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `92503d3b-8029-499a-8739-a93d11398f57`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b2c6bedb280e674bb7a2840cb0cbf606621fce5 and 5ae0e96c35f71832b54379ff65f6a5e5e92c4a13.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\n> \n>

\n\n\n\n\n\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\n\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\n\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `codex/parity-projection-crosswalk`\n\n

\n\n

❤️ Share

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n","base_ref","head_ref","pull_request_info",[687],{"_558":45,"_45":688},"@codex Resolved the self-review findings in follow-up commit `5ae0e96c` (`fix(ir): normalize parity sentinel evidence`).\n\n| Finding | Resolution | Regression Coverage |\n| :--- | :--- | :--- |\n| Rust hash comparison included top-level metadata | `scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs` now computes the Rust L1 semantic hash from a clone with top-level `metadata` removed before canonical JSON hashing, matching the Rust `compute_registry_hash` contract. | `test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats` now covers a fake Rust lowerer that emits metadata while `schema hash` strips it; the sentinel must pass. |\n| JSON evidence omitted projected bytes promised by design | JSON fixture reports now include canonical `legacyBytes` and `rustBytes` alongside hashes and mismatch data. | The passing projection test asserts both byte fields are present in `--json` output. |\n\nValidation after the fix:\n\n- `pnpm exec eslint scripts/check-ir-parity.mjs scripts/ir-parity-projection.mjs --max-warnings=0`\n- `BATS_LIB_PATH=packages/wesley-cli/test bats -t test/ir-parity-sentinel.bats`\n- `pnpm parity:ir`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-whitespace`\n- `pnpm run lint:docs-truth`\n- `git diff --check`\n- `pnpm run preflight`\n- `bash scripts/smoke/repo-bats-prepush.sh`\n- `git push` pre-push hook reran repository preflight and repo Bats smoke suite successfully\n",[836,837],[],{"_563":564,"_45":565,"_566":567},{"_537":827},{"_331":826},{"_331":724},{"_299":300,"_291":301,"_302":303,"_304":15,"_305":57,"_306":15,"_307":308,"_309":310,"_311":264,"_312":125,"_313":314,"_315":127,"_316":317,"_318":-5,"_319":-5,"_320":723,"_322":323,"_324":325,"_326":327,"_328":329},{"_41":121,"_191":192,"_193":194,"_195":15,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":712,"_202":-5,"_203":-5,"_204":713,"_206":207,"_208":207,"_209":714,"_211":715,"_213":716,"_215":-5,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_220":221,"_222":717,"_53":-5,"_117":224,"_225":718,"_227":719,"_229":230,"_231":15,"_232":15},{"_131":705},[699,700,701,702,703,704],{"_146":169,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":170,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":168,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":165,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":166,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":167,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":162,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":165,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":160,"_148":149,"_150":151,"_152":161,"_154":155,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":147,"_148":149,"_150":151,"_152":153,"_154":155,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},[706,707,708],{"_175":711,"_177":188},{"_175":710,"_177":184},{"_175":709,"_177":178},{"_179":180,"_90":181,"_117":182},{"_179":185,"_90":181,"_117":186},{"_179":189,"_90":181,"_117":190},{"_293":294,"_295":-5,"_296":-5,"_297":-5,"_298":-5},[254],{"_254":720},{"_236":237,"_238":239,"_240":241,"_242":243,"_244":245,"_246":247,"_248":249,"_250":251,"_252":253},{},[],{"_235":57},{"_233":57,"_234":207},{"_41":256,"_179":257,"_258":721,"_260":194,"_261":262,"_263":264,"_265":266,"_267":268,"_269":270,"_271":62,"_272":15,"_273":-5,"_274":-5,"_275":-5,"_276":-5,"_277":-5,"_278":-5,"_158":279,"_280":-5,"_53":722},{"_285":286,"_41":287,"_90":288,"_289":290,"_291":292},{"_282":15,"_283":15,"_284":15},{"_285":286,"_179":286,"_330":-5,"_289":290,"_41":287},[725,726,727,728,729,730,731,732,733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747],{"_152":516,"_357":822},{"_152":372,"_357":819},{"_152":506,"_357":816},{"_152":376,"_357":811},{"_152":376,"_357":806},{"_152":376,"_357":802},{"_152":390,"_357":797},{"_152":390,"_357":793},{"_152":376,"_357":790},{"_152":376,"_357":788},{"_152":390,"_357":784},{"_152":376,"_357":782},{"_152":390,"_357":778},{"_152":376,"_357":774},{"_152":376,"_357":772},{"_152":390,"_357":768},{"_152":376,"_357":766},{"_152":390,"_357":762},{"_152":376,"_357":759},{"_152":390,"_357":757},{"_152":376,"_357":753},{"_152":372,"_357":751},{"_152":356,"_357":748},{"_359":360,"_85":749},{"_362":363,"_364":365,"_101":-5,"_41":366,"_367":750,"_369":370,"_371":111},[],{"_371":752,"_359":360},{"_90":375},{"_378":754,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":755,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":385,"_94":91,"_90":386},[756],{"_45":388,"_90":389},{"_378":758,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_41":393,"_384":385,"_45":388,"_90":394},{"_378":760,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":-5,"_397":398,"_41":-5,"_399":761,"_90":401},[],{"_378":763,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":764,"_41":405,"_399":765,"_90":401},[],[],{"_378":767,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_409":410,"_411":412,"_90":413},{"_378":769,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_416":417,"_418":419,"_420":770,"_422":423,"_364":31,"_424":31,"_41":410,"_425":426,"_427":428,"_371":111,"_90":429},[771],{"_418":431,"_90":432},{"_378":773,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_435":436,"_409":410,"_41":-5,"_179":437,"_438":-5,"_90":439},{"_378":775,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":-5,"_397":442,"_41":-5,"_399":776,"_90":401},[777],{"_45":445,"_90":446},{"_378":779,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":780,"_41":450,"_399":781,"_90":401},[],[445],{"_378":783,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_409":454,"_411":455,"_90":413},{"_378":785,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_416":458,"_418":459,"_420":786,"_422":423,"_364":31,"_424":31,"_41":454,"_425":461,"_427":428,"_371":111,"_90":429},[787],{"_418":463,"_159":-5,"_90":464},{"_378":789,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_435":467,"_409":454,"_41":-5,"_179":437,"_438":-5,"_90":439},{"_378":791,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":-5,"_397":470,"_41":-5,"_399":792,"_90":401},[],{"_378":794,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":795,"_41":475,"_399":796,"_90":401},[],[],{"_378":798,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":799,"_41":480,"_90":481},[800],{"_45":483,"_484":801,"_90":45},[],{"_378":803,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":804,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":320,"_90":386},[805],{"_45":483,"_90":490},{"_378":807,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":808,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":320,"_90":386},[809,810],{"_45":497,"_90":490},{"_45":496,"_90":490},{"_378":812,"_359":360,"_380":366},{"_381":813,"_383":-5,"_41":-5,"_384":-5,"_94":501,"_90":386},[814,815],{"_45":505,"_90":490},{"_45":504,"_90":490},{"_359":360,"_85":817},{"_101":-5,"_41":366,"_367":818,"_369":370,"_371":510},[],{"_371":820,"_359":360},{"_513":821,"_90":515},[],{"_518":823},{"_520":-5,"_521":-5,"_522":523,"_524":370,"_422":423,"_525":15,"_526":-5,"_527":-5,"_41":360,"_528":529,"_179":-5,"_159":530,"_531":207,"_427":532,"_371":824,"_75":825,"_535":370},{"_90":375},[],[],[828],{"_41":540,"_541":829,"_543":544,"_545":544,"_381":830,"_371":547,"_383":-5,"_548":31,"_549":831,"_551":552,"_553":-5},{"_94":320,"_179":-5,"_549":835},{"_558":45,"_559":834},{"_554":832},{"_556":833},[],[561],{},{"_90":386,"_94":91,"_381":843},{"_90":570,"_571":838},[839],{"_159":574,"_575":-5,"_576":840,"_578":-5},[841],{"_580":581,"_582":583,"_381":842,"_585":57},[586,207,587,207,588,207,589,590,591,592,207,593,207,594,207,595,596,597,207,598,599,600,601,207,602,603,604,605,207,606,607,608,207,609,207,610,207,611,612,613,614,207,615,207,616,207,617,618,619,620,207,621,622],[844,845,846,847,848],{"_558":45,"_45":636},{"_558":630,"_159":574,"_580":634,"_582":635},{"_558":45,"_45":633},{"_558":630,"_159":574,"_580":631,"_582":632},{"_558":45,"_45":629},[851,852,853,854,855,856,857,858],{"_646":647,"_260":194,"_648":300,"_271":-5,"_649":254,"_650":-5,"_651":652,"_653":654,"_655":-5,"_656":-5,"_657":658,"_659":15,"_660":57,"_661":52,"_662":15},{"_90":386,"_94":320,"_381":859},{"_307":308,"_309":310,"_683":314,"_684":127,"_316":-5,"_90":685},{"_90":671,"_309":682,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":681,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":680,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":679,"_159":676,"_673":677,"_674":-5},{"_90":671,"_309":675,"_159":676,"_673":677,"_674":678},{"_90":671,"_309":672,"_159":-5,"_673":-5,"_674":-5},[860],{"_558":45,"_45":688},"task_e_6a1045454fe0832aa656c3e992e27532",1779451205.312109,"Github Mention: feat(ir): add parity projection sentinel","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_892":31,"_893":894,"_895":-5,"_896":-5,"_887":897,"_898":-5,"_899":-5,"_900":-5,"_901":-5},"task_status_display",{"_880":881,"_882":194,"_128":125,"_883":-5,"_884":885},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[873],{"_41":874,"_875":81,"_876":877,"_878":127},"github-1049014142-514","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_299":300,"_291":301,"_302":303,"_304":15,"_305":57,"_306":15,"_307":308,"_309":310,"_311":264,"_312":125,"_313":314,"_315":127,"_316":317,"_318":-5,"_319":-5,"_320":879,"_322":323,"_324":325,"_326":327,"_328":329},"codex_updated_sha",{"_285":286,"_179":286,"_330":-5,"_289":290,"_41":287},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_886":81,"_110":111,"_887":-5,"_92":888,"_889":-5,"_890":-5,"_891":885,"_112":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","pr","turn_id","diff_stats",[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_902":-5,"_903":-5,"_904":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","files_modified","lines_added","lines_removed","dd",{"_916":917,"_918":919},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",915],"traceId","9068543307810889739","traceTime",1779515494856]