\\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\\n> \\n> After more review capacity refills, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\\n> \\n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n> \\n>

\\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\\n> \\n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\\n> \\n> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, review capacity refills continuously over time.\\n> \\n> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\\n> \\n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\\n> \\n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\\n> \\n> **Plan**: Pro\\n> \\n> **Run ID**: `c4c694b7-5a04-4fb6-81ea-679492adf5ab`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📥 Commits

\\n> \\n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01 and add115d089de856a2499c4824fec393bc7dc7df2.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

\\n> \\n> * `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`\\n> * `crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`\\n> * `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\\n> * `docs/BEARING.md`\\n> * `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

📝 Walkthrough

\\n\\n## Walkthrough\\n\\nAdds `echo-cli wal submission-posture` to report read-only WAL recovery posture for a submission/envelope pair; records scheduler tick receipts into runtime WAL with rollback on failure; provides read-only recovery APIs that rebuild submission and receipt indexes; adds tests, docs, man pages, and xtask automation for the runtime-wal-ack slice.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n**Runtime WAL ACK Integration**\\n\\n|Layer / File(s)|Summary|\\n|---|---|\\n|**CLI contract and parsing**
`crates/warp-cli/src/cli.rs`|New `WalCommands::SubmissionPosture` variant accepts root path, submission ID, and canonical envelope digest as hex strings, with unit test validating argument parsing.|\\n|**CLI wiring and submission_posture handler**
`crates/warp-cli/src/main.rs`, `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`|Wires subcommand in main; implements `submission_posture()` handler, output struct, hex parsing, posture-label helpers, and emits text/JSON output.|\\n|**CLI integration tests & WAL fixture**
`crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`|Adds `filesystem_wal_with_decided_submission()` fixture and integration tests asserting `wal submission-posture --format json` behavior and `wal --help` includes the topic.|\\n|**Docs, man pages, and changelog**
`docs/man/echo-cli-wal-submission-posture.1`, `docs/man/echo-cli-wal.1`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `docs/BEARING.md`, `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`, `docs/workflows.md`|Adds man page for the new command, updates `echo-cli wal` man page, changelog and design docs to describe the generic recovery posture contract and runtime-wal-ack slice, and updates workflows.|\\n|**Xtask test-slice automation**
`xtask/src/main.rs`|Adds `TestSlice::RuntimeWalAck`, builds a command sequence to run focused tests, stale-claim grep, and man-page check; includes unit tests validating produced commands and doc freshness.|\\n|**Recovered index root hashing**
`crates/warp-core/src/causal_wal.rs`|Adds `WAL_RECOVERED_INDEX_ROOT_DOMAIN` and `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root()` that deterministically hashes recovered submission and receipt index contents with posture codes.|\\n|**Trusted runtime WAL model & errors**
`crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`|Expand imports; add `TrustedRuntimeWalError` recovery and tick-evidence variants; introduce `TrustedRuntimeWalRecovery` bundling certificate and rebuilt submission/receipt indexes.|\\n|**Tick recording, recovery APIs, and helpers**
`crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`|`tick_once` snapshots/rolls back runtime/provenance on failure, derives `WalTickDecision`, records per-tick receipt WAL transactions with frontier digest updates; adds `recover_read_only()`, `scheduler_tick_count()`, `record_tick_receipt()`, decision/digest helpers, and recovery-certificate builder with unit tests.|\\n|**Trusted runtime host loop tests**
`crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`|Adds `runtime_pair()` and tests for tick commit-before-publish, WAL overflow rollback (single and multi-head), read-only recovery rebuilding posture and ticket mappings, and recovery certificate LSN/counter assertions.|\\n\\n## Sequence Diagram(s)\\n\\n```mermaid\\nsequenceDiagram\\n participant Host as TrustedRuntimeHost\\n participant Scheduler as SchedulerCoordinator\\n participant WAL as TrustedRuntimeWal\\n Host->>Host: snapshot runtime & provenance\\n Host->>Scheduler: super_tick()\\n Scheduler-->>Host: intent outcome + new receipt correlations\\n Host->>WAL: record_tick_receipt(decision, correlations, frontiers)\\n WAL->>WAL: build SchedulerTick transaction\\n WAL->>WAL: append transaction to store\\n WAL->>WAL: update receipt & runtime-state frontier digests\\n alt WAL append failure\\n Host->>Host: rollback runtime & provenance\\n end\\n Host-->>Host: return tick result\\n```\\n\\n## Estimated code review effort\\n\\n🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes\\n\\n## Possibly related PRs\\n\\n- [flyingrobots/echo#145](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/pull/145): Introduces tick-receipt/decision-digest primitives used by this PR.\\n- [flyingrobots/echo#148](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/pull/148): Related scheduler tick/receipt machinery changes that interact with tick receipt construction and recording.\\n\\n## Suggested labels\\n\\n`tooling`\\n\\n## Poem\\n\\n> WAL-backed ticks commit before they publish, \\n> Recovery scans rebuild the indexed truth; \\n> CLI reports posture, digest, and trace, \\n> Tests guard rollback, multi-head, and race. 🎯\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

\\n\\n### ❌ Failed checks (1 warning)\\n\\n| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |\\n| :----------------: | :--------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\\n| Docstring Coverage | ⚠️ Warning | Docstring coverage is 70.69% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. | Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold. |\\n\\n

\\n

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

\\n\\n_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\\n\\n

\\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\\n\\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `stack/runtime-wal-tick-receipts`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/echo&utm_content=379)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\\n\\n

\\n

❤️ Share

\\n\\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Roll back WAL appends when a later tick WAL write fails**\\n\\nIf one `super_tick` pass produces multiple new receipt correlations, this loop can append some scheduler-tick WAL transactions before a later append fails; on failure it restores only `runtime` and `provenance`, so earlier WAL commits from the same pass remain durable. That leaves recovery indexes showing decided receipts that were rolled back from live runtime state, violating the commit-before-publish atomicity this change is trying to enforce (e.g., partial success followed by `LsnOverflow` or store error on a later correlation).\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":317}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"\\n### 💡 Codex Review\\n\\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\\n\\n**Reviewed commit:** `13690936e8`\\n \\n\\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\\n
\\n\\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\\n- Open a pull request for review\\n- Mark a draft as ready\\n- Comment \\\"@codex review\\\".\\n\\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \\\"@codex address that feedback\\\".\\n \\n

\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\\n\\n**Include canonical envelope digest in text output.**\\n\\nLine [91] omits `canonical_envelope_digest` in text mode, so the reported posture is ambiguous for the queried `(submission_id, envelope)` pair.\\n\\n \\n\\n

\\n

Proposed patch

\\n\\n```diff\\n- let text = format!(\\n- \\\"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\\\nRoot: {}\\\\nSubmission: {}\\\\nRetry posture: {}\\\\nRecovered posture: {}\\\\nReceipt: {}\\\\nTicket: {}\\\\n\\\",\\n+ let text = format!(\\n+ \\\"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\\\nRoot: {}\\\\nSubmission: {}\\\\nCanonical envelope: {}\\\\nRetry posture: {}\\\\nRecovered posture: {}\\\\nReceipt: {}\\\\nTicket: {}\\\\n\\\",\\n output.root,\\n output.submission_id,\\n+ output.canonical_envelope_digest,\\n output.retry_posture,\\n output.recovered_posture.unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\"),\\n output.receipt_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\"),\\n output.ticket_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\")\\n );\\n```\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

📝 Committable suggestion

\\n\\n> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**\\n> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.\\n\\n```suggestion\\n let text = format!(\\n \\\"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\\\nRoot: {}\\\\nSubmission: {}\\\\nCanonical envelope: {}\\\\nRetry posture: {}\\\\nRecovered posture: {}\\\\nReceipt: {}\\\\nTicket: {}\\\\n\\\",\\n output.root,\\n output.submission_id,\\n output.canonical_envelope_digest,\\n output.retry_posture,\\n output.recovered_posture.unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\"),\\n output.receipt_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\"),\\n output.ticket_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\")\\n );\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nIn `@crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` around lines 90 - 98, The formatted text assigned\\nto the variable `text` in `wal.rs` is missing the `canonical_envelope_digest`,\\nso update the format string and its argument list to include that field (e.g.,\\nadd a \\\"Canonical envelope: {}\\\" line) and pass\\n`output.canonical_envelope_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\")` alongside the\\nother `output.*` arguments to ensure the canonical envelope digest is printed in\\ntext mode.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":99}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _🏗️ Heavy lift_\\n\\n**Partial WAL failure leaves committed records without runtime rollback.**\\n\\nIf `super_tick` produces multiple correlations and `record_tick_receipt` fails on the second or subsequent record, the first WAL record(s) remain committed while `runtime` and `provenance` are rolled back. On recovery, the WAL shows submissions decided but in-memory state doesn't reflect them.\\n\\nOptions:\\n1. Batch all tick receipts into a single atomic WAL transaction.\\n2. Track which WAL records were written and roll them back on partial failure (would require WAL support for uncommitting).\\n3. Document that partial failure is unsupported and the in-memory adapter is only valid for single-correlation ticks.\\n\\nGiven this is the reference test adapter, option 3 may suffice for now, but production adapters should consider atomicity.\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 277 - 287, Partial\\nWAL failure can leave some tick WAL records committed while runtime/provenance\\nare rolled back; to avoid inconsistent state in this reference test adapter,\\nenforce or document that multi-correlation ticks are unsupported when a WAL is\\nin use: in the code path around runtime_wal and tick_wal_records (check the\\nblock using self.runtime_wal.as_mut(), runtime_wal.record_tick_receipt,\\ntick_wal_records, runtime_before, provenance_before and the super_tick caller),\\neither (A) add a guard that returns an explicit error if tick_wal_records\\ncontains more than one entry when self.runtime_wal.is_some(), or (B) add a clear\\ninline comment and documentation stating that only single-correlation ticks are\\nsupported with this adapter and that production adapters must provide atomic WAL\\nsemantics; pick (A) for safety in tests or (B) if you prefer a\\ndocumentation-only change.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n✅ Addressed in commit 1f596c8\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":320}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**Actionable comments posted: 2**\\n\\n> [!CAUTION]\\n> Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.\\n> \\n> \\n> \\n>

\\n>

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

\\n> \\n>
\\n>
docs/BEARING.md (1)
\\n> \\n> `6-6`: _⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\\n> \\n> **Update stale document timestamp metadata.**\\n> \\n> Line 6 still says `Last updated: 2026-05-24.` even though this PR updates the file on May 25, 2026. Please bump it to the actual update date to keep roadmap metadata trustworthy.\\n> \\n> \\n> \\n> As per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees and related references.\\n> \\n>
\\n>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
\\n> \\n> ```\\n> Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\n> rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n> \\n> In `@docs/BEARING.md` at line 6, Update the stale timestamp string \\\"Last updated:\\n> 2026-05-24.\\\" in the BEARING.md document to the correct date \\\"Last updated:\\n> 2026-05-25.\\\" so the document metadata matches this PR's update; locate the\\n> literal \\\"Last updated: 2026-05-24.\\\" and replace it with the new date.\\n> ```\\n> \\n>
\\n> \\n>
\\n> \\n>

\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nInline comments:\\nIn `@crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`:\\n- Around line 90-98: The formatted text assigned to the variable `text` in\\n`wal.rs` is missing the `canonical_envelope_digest`, so update the format string\\nand its argument list to include that field (e.g., add a \\\"Canonical envelope:\\n{}\\\" line) and pass\\n`output.canonical_envelope_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\\\"None\\\")` alongside the\\nother `output.*` arguments to ensure the canonical envelope digest is printed in\\ntext mode.\\n\\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`:\\n- Around line 277-287: Partial WAL failure can leave some tick WAL records\\ncommitted while runtime/provenance are rolled back; to avoid inconsistent state\\nin this reference test adapter, enforce or document that multi-correlation ticks\\nare unsupported when a WAL is in use: in the code path around runtime_wal and\\ntick_wal_records (check the block using self.runtime_wal.as_mut(),\\nruntime_wal.record_tick_receipt, tick_wal_records, runtime_before,\\nprovenance_before and the super_tick caller), either (A) add a guard that\\nreturns an explicit error if tick_wal_records contains more than one entry when\\nself.runtime_wal.is_some(), or (B) add a clear inline comment and documentation\\nstating that only single-correlation ticks are supported with this adapter and\\nthat production adapters must provide atomic WAL semantics; pick (A) for safety\\nin tests or (B) if you prefer a documentation-only change.\\n\\n---\\n\\nOutside diff comments:\\nIn `@docs/BEARING.md`:\\n- Line 6: Update the stale timestamp string \\\"Last updated: 2026-05-24.\\\" in the\\nBEARING.md document to the correct date \\\"Last updated: 2026-05-25.\\\" so the\\ndocument metadata matches this PR's update; locate the literal \\\"Last updated:\\n2026-05-24.\\\" and replace it with the new date.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\\n\\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\\n\\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n

\\n

ℹ️ Review info

\\n\\n

\\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\\n\\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\\n\\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\\n\\n**Plan**: Pro\\n\\n**Run ID**: `484f6967-5f70-450a-a49a-ef19e05caeeb`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

📥 Commits

\\n\\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 363fd86739ba4a37ba19f5a25fdd7a98838085d7 and 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358.\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\\n\\n* `CHANGELOG.md`\\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/cli.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/main.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`\\n* `docs/BEARING.md`\\n* `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\\n* `docs/man/echo-cli-wal-submission-posture.1`\\n* `docs/man/echo-cli-wal.1`\\n* `docs/workflows.md`\\n* `xtask/src/main.rs`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"@codex self-review findings for PR #379. Please confirm or challenge the severity/mitigation before we merge.\\n\\n| Severity | File / lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended mitigation prompt |\\n|---|---|---|---|---|\\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:277-285`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:534-536` | Scheduler tick WAL recording is not failure-atomic across a multi-head `super_tick`. | `tick_once` appends one scheduler-tick WAL transaction per new receipt correlation. If an earlier `record_tick_receipt(...)` succeeds and a later one fails, the code restores `runtime`/`provenance` but leaves the earlier WAL transaction and WAL frontier advances committed. `super_tick` can emit multiple records in one pass, so recovery may see tick evidence for a runtime state that was rolled back. | Add a regression with two independent heads in one `super_tick` and an injected failure on the second tick WAL record; assert `scheduler_tick_count() == 0` and recovered receipt/submission indexes contain no tick decision. Then make tick WAL recording atomic for the whole attempted scheduler pass: prebuild all tick transactions before append and restore/checkpoint `TrustedRuntimeWal` on failure, or introduce a batch append boundary whose failure cannot leave partial scheduler-tick evidence. |\\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:735-748` | Internal receipt-correlation inconsistency is converted into `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation(...)` returns `Obstructed` when `observe_intent_outcome(...)` is not `Decided` or when the observed receipt digest does not match the correlation being recorded. Those are internal consistency failures for this path, not lawful obstruction outcomes, and recording them as `Obstructed` makes recovery evidence look normal. | Change the helper to return `Result` and treat non-decided/mismatched correlation as a runtime/WAL invariant error that rolls back the attempted tick publication. Add regressions for missing observation and receipt-digest mismatch proving no scheduler-tick WAL transaction is committed. |\\n| P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:404-412`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:835-856` | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` does not bind recovered index contents. | `recover_read_only()` rebuilds `submissions` and `receipts`, but `runtime_wal_recovery_certificate(&report)` computes `recovered_indexes_root` only from transaction ids and commit digests. The certificate can therefore remain unchanged even if index reconstruction is wrong, incomplete, or later refactored incorrectly. | Compute the runtime WAL recovered index root from the rebuilt `RecoveredSubmissionIndex` and `RecoveredReceiptIndex` entries, not just the scan report. Add a test that proves the certificate root changes when recovered submission/receipt index content changes and that it includes posture, ticket, receipt, and envelope identity. |\\n| P2 | `docs/BEARING.md:992-998`, `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md:127-133` | BEARING overclaims the cross-repo jedit fixture as complete. | Slice 94 is checked and its test plan says the sibling `jedit` fixture consumes generic Echo recovery JSON. This PR adds the Echo CLI posture surface and the release-gate doc says jedit *may* call it, but no sibling jedit fixture is included here. | Either uncheck/reword Slice 94 as “Echo recovery posture contract” and add a follow-on jedit fixture slice, or land the actual sibling jedit fixture before claiming the slice complete. Keep the PR description aligned with whichever truth is chosen. |\\n\\nLocal validation while reviewing:\\n\\n- `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD`\\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"\\n### 💡 Codex Review\\n\\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\\n\\n**Reviewed commit:** `13690936e8`\\n \\n\\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Make scheduler tick WAL writes failure-atomic**\\n\\nWhen `tick_once` records multiple new correlations from one `super_tick`, a failure on a later `record_tick_receipt` only restores `runtime`/`provenance` and returns, but any earlier tick WAL commits in the same loop remain durable. In a multi-head pass this can leave committed scheduler-tick evidence for state that was rolled back, so recovery can report decided/advanced receipt posture that never became visible in runtime.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":317}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Fail on invariant mismatch instead of recording Obstructed**\\n\\nThis helper maps non-`Decided` observations and receipt-digest mismatches to `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`, which turns internal consistency failures on the host WAL publication path into apparently lawful obstruction outcomes. If this path is ever hit (e.g., future refactor/regression), recovery evidence will look normal instead of surfacing a broken runtime/WAL invariant and aborting the publish attempt.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Bind recovered index root to recovered index contents**\\n\\n`recovered_indexes_root` is derived only from transaction ids and commit digests, not from the rebuilt submission/receipt index entries. That means the certificate’s index root can stay unchanged even if index reconstruction logic produces different contents, weakening the certificate as evidence of recovered posture correctness.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"@codex resolved the self-review findings in `1f596c8`.\\n\\n| Severity | Finding | Resolution | Commit |\\n|---|---|---|---|\\n| P1 | Scheduler tick WAL recording was not failure-atomic across multi-head `super_tick`. | Added `runtime_wal_ack_multi_head_tick_failure_rolls_back_all_tick_records`; `TrustedRuntimeHost::tick_once` now snapshots `TrustedRuntimeWal` before scheduler-tick publication and restores it, runtime, and provenance on any tick WAL failure. | `1f596c8` |\\n| P1 | Receipt-correlation invariant mismatch was encoded as normal `Obstructed` evidence. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation` now returns `Result`; pending/missing outcomes and receipt-digest mismatches become typed invariant errors. Added unit witnesses for pending, mismatch, and matching decisions. | `1f596c8` |\\n| P2 | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` did not bind rebuilt index contents. | Added `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root(...)` over recovered submission and receipt indexes; `TrustedRuntimeWalRecovery` certificates now use that root, with assertion coverage in the runtime WAL recovery test. | `1f596c8` |\\n| P2 | BEARING overclaimed the sibling jedit fixture as complete. | Reworded Slice 94 as the Echo recovery posture contract and marked the sibling jedit fixture as the next cross-repo consumer witness. | `1f596c8` |\\n\\nValidation after the fix:\\n\\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib trusted_runtime_host::tests::runtime_wal_tick_decision`\\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --test trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests runtime_wal_ack`\\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\\n- `cargo clippy -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib -- -D warnings`\\n- `cargo check -p xtask`\\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\\n- `git diff --check`\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"### Summary\\n* Added the canonical envelope digest to `echo-cli wal submission-posture` text output so text mode now identifies the exact `(submission, envelope)` pair being reported. [crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rsL90-L99](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs#L90-L99)\\n* Updated `docs/BEARING.md` metadata timestamp from `2026-05-24` to `2026-05-25` to match the current update date. [docs/BEARING.mdL6](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/docs/BEARING.md#L6)\\n\\n**Testing**\\n* ✅ `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_json_reports`\\n* ✅ `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md`\\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\\n\\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a14841321d88191b3eb18000266a5f7)\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\\n\\n**Avoid shipping these as completed guarantees until code/tests prove them.**\\n\\nThis entry asserts three high-risk behaviors that are still called out as unresolved in PR context (multi-head tick WAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-content-bound recovery certificate root). Please downgrade wording to “targeted/expected” or split into follow-up items until the fixes and regressions land. \\n \\nAs per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees.\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nIn `@CHANGELOG.md` around lines 540 - 544, The changelog sentence claiming\\n\\\"Runtime WAL-backed scheduler ticks now roll back all tick WAL evidence...,\\ntreat missing or mismatched receipt correlation evidence as an invariant\\nerror..., and bind runtime recovery certificates to rebuilt submission and\\nreceipt indexes\\\" overstates guarantees; change the wording to a tentative form\\n(e.g., \\\"targeted/expected\\\" or \\\"planned\\\") or split into three follow-up items\\nuntil code/tests validate them: specifically update the phrases \\\"roll back all\\ntick WAL evidence\\\", \\\"treat ... as an invariant error\\\", and \\\"bind ...\\ncertificates to rebuilt ... indexes\\\" to indicate they are intended/targeted\\nbehaviors or move each as a separate pending/experimental bullet referencing the\\nmulti-head tick WAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-bound\\nrecovery certificate workstreams.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\",\"path\":\"CHANGELOG.md\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":544}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\\n\\n**Do not persist `NoMatchingReceiptEntry` as a lawful obstruction.**\\n\\n`IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry` means the correlation exists but the retained receipt cannot reproduce it, so this is an invariant break, not an `Obstructed` scheduler outcome. Recording it as `WalTickDecision::Obstructed` will commit corrupted tick evidence instead of rolling the pass back. Return a `TrustedRuntimeWalError` here and add a regression for this branch.\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 791 - 798, The\\nmatch currently maps IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed which incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence;\\nchange this arm to return an Err(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...))\\n(or an appropriate TrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of\\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed so the pass is rolled back rather than recorded,\\nupdate the surrounding function signature/propagation if needed to return\\nTrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a regression test that triggers\\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to assert the error is returned\\n(not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\",\"path\":\"crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":803}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\\n\\n**Document the full recovered posture label set (or mark this list explicitly non-exhaustive).**\\n\\n`echo-cli wal submission-posture` can emit `RecoveryFaulted` (`crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`, recovered_posture_label), but this section lists only five classifications. That mismatch can cause incorrect jedit adapter mapping logic. \\n \\nAs per coding guidelines, documentation touching determinism/recovery contracts must stay factually accurate.\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nIn `@docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` around lines 128 - 133, The doc\\ncurrently lists five recovered posture labels but omits RecoveryFaulted which\\necho-cli wal submission-posture (see recovered_posture_label in\\ncrates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs) can emit; update the section describing the\\nrecovered posture label set (and/or mark it explicitly non-exhaustive) so jedit\\nfixture authors mapping logic in the Echo adapter accounts for RecoveryFaulted\\nas well as the five existing labels (not accepted, accepted pending, decided\\napplied, decided rejected, obstructed), and state the authoritative source of\\ntruth for this enum to keep the contract deterministic.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\",\"path\":\"docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**Actionable comments posted: 3**\\n\\n

\\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\\n\\n```\\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\\n\\nInline comments:\\nIn `@CHANGELOG.md`:\\n- Around line 540-544: The changelog sentence claiming \\\"Runtime WAL-backed\\nscheduler ticks now roll back all tick WAL evidence..., treat missing or\\nmismatched receipt correlation evidence as an invariant error..., and bind\\nruntime recovery certificates to rebuilt submission and receipt indexes\\\"\\noverstates guarantees; change the wording to a tentative form (e.g.,\\n\\\"targeted/expected\\\" or \\\"planned\\\") or split into three follow-up items until\\ncode/tests validate them: specifically update the phrases \\\"roll back all tick\\nWAL evidence\\\", \\\"treat ... as an invariant error\\\", and \\\"bind ... certificates to\\nrebuilt ... indexes\\\" to indicate they are intended/targeted behaviors or move\\neach as a separate pending/experimental bullet referencing the multi-head tick\\nWAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-bound recovery\\ncertificate workstreams.\\n\\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`:\\n- Around line 791-798: The match currently maps\\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to WalTickDecision::Obstructed\\nwhich incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence; change this arm to return an\\nErr(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...)) (or an appropriate\\nTrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of WalTickDecision::Obstructed so the\\npass is rolled back rather than recorded, update the surrounding function\\nsignature/propagation if needed to return TrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a\\nregression test that triggers IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\\nassert the error is returned (not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\\n\\nIn `@docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`:\\n- Around line 128-133: The doc currently lists five recovered posture labels but\\nomits RecoveryFaulted which echo-cli wal submission-posture (see\\nrecovered_posture_label in crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs) can emit; update the\\nsection describing the recovered posture label set (and/or mark it explicitly\\nnon-exhaustive) so jedit fixture authors mapping logic in the Echo adapter\\naccounts for RecoveryFaulted as well as the five existing labels (not accepted,\\naccepted pending, decided applied, decided rejected, obstructed), and state the\\nauthoritative source of truth for this enum to keep the contract deterministic.\\n```\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\\n\\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\\n\\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\\n\\n

\\n\\n---\\n\\n

\\n

ℹ️ Review info

\\n\\n

\\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\\n\\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\\n\\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\\n\\n**Plan**: Pro\\n\\n**Run ID**: `8b5ce4ad-d184-425f-b09a-481cebf4af3b`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

📥 Commits

\\n\\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358 and 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01.\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

\\n\\n* `CHANGELOG.md`\\n* `crates/warp-core/src/causal_wal.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\\n* `crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`\\n* `docs/BEARING.md`\\n* `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\\n* `docs/workflows.md`\\n* `xtask/src/main.rs`\\n\\n

\\n\\n

\\n\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}","text_elements",[],{"_369":408,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":409,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":321,"_90":377},[410],{"_45":404,"_90":411},"input_text",{"_369":413,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":414,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":321,"_90":377},[415,416],{"_45":418,"_90":411},{"_45":417,"_90":411},"\n /workspace/echo\n bash\n 2026-05-25\n Etc/UTC\n","# AGENTS.md instructions for /workspace/echo\n\n\n\n\n\n# AGENTS\n\nThis guide is for AI agents and human operators recovering context in the Echo repository.\n\n## Architecture North Star\n\nEcho is not a graph database, app framework, sync daemon, or mutable state\nserver. Echo is a deterministic WARP runtime over witnessed causal history.\n\nThe durable territory is admitted causal history: transitions, frontiers, lane\nidentities, payload hashes, receipts, witnesses, checkpoints, suffixes, and\nretained boundary artifacts. Graphs, files, editor buffers, UI state, and debug\nviews are materialized readings emitted by observers or optics over that\nhistory. They may be cached, retained, transported, compared, or revealed, but\nthey are not the substrate ontology.\n\nPublic Echo surfaces should follow the WARP optic shape:\n\n```text\nexplicit causal basis/site\n+ bounded aperture\n+ law\n+ support, capability, budget, and evidence posture\n-> witnessed hologram\n```\n\nExternal callers propose explicit-base intents or observe through bounded\noptics. Echo admits, stages, pluralizes, conflicts, or obstructs those claims\nunder named law and emits receipts, reading envelopes, witnesses, or retained\nshells. Transport is witnessed suffix admission, not state sync. Application\nnouns belong in authored contracts and generated adapters, not in Echo core.\n\nKeep these sentences in view when changing architecture, docs, or APIs:\n\n```text\nThere is witnessed causal history.\nWARP optics chart it.\nHolograms witness those charts.\nMaterialized graphs are optional readings.\nContinuum is the protocol for lawful causal-history exchange.\n```\n\n## Git Rules\n\n- **NEVER** amend commits.\n- **NEVER** rebase or force-push.\n- **NEVER** push to `main` without explicit permission.\n- Always use standard commits and regular pushes.\n\n## Documentation & Planning Map\n\nDo not audit the repository by recursively walking the filesystem. Follow the authoritative manifests:\n\n### 1. The Entrance\n\n- **`README.md`**: Public front door, core value prop, and quick tour.\n- **`GUIDE.md`**: Orientation and productive-fast path.\n- **`docs/index.md`**: VitePress documentation map.\n\n### 2. The Bedrock\n\n- **`ARCHITECTURE.md`**: Authoritative structural reference (Hexagonal, Core, Memory).\n- **`VISION.md`**: Core tenets and the causal mission.\n- **`METHOD.md`**: Repo work doctrine (Backlog lanes, Cycle loop).\n\n### 3. The Direction\n\n- **`docs/BEARING.md`**: Current execution gravity and active tensions.\n- **`docs/design/ROADMAP.md`**: Broad strategic horizon and targets.\n- **`backlog/`**: The active source of truth for pending work.\n\n### 4. The Proof\n\n- **`CHANGELOG.md`**: Historical truth of merged behavior.\n- **`cargo xtask dind`**: Determinism convergence verification.\n\n## Context Recovery Protocol\n\nWhen starting a new session or recovering from context loss:\n\n1. **Read `docs/BEARING.md`** to find the current execution gravity.\n2. **Read `METHOD.md`** to understand the work doctrine.\n3. **Check `backlog/asap/`** for imminent work.\n4. **Check `git log -n 5` and `git status`** to verify the current branch state.\n\n## Executable Claim Protocol\n\nEngineering work must converge around executable evidence, not broad repository\ninterpretation. Before editing code, reduce the task to one executable claim:\n\n1. **Bound the Claim**: State the behavior, invariant, or artifact that must\n change.\n2. **Name the Witness**: Identify the smallest test, check, script, compile\n contract, golden vector, schema validation, or artifact inspection that can\n prove the claim.\n3. **Run the Witness When Feasible**: Prefer a failing witness before the fix.\n If the witness cannot execute because the repository is already broken,\n repair only the minimal compile/runtime blocker required to run it.\n4. **Do Not Expand from an Unblocker**: Do not turn a compile blocker into\n nearby architecture cleanup, docs cleanup, lint cleanup, migration sweep, or\n opportunistic refactor.\n5. **Green the Claim**: Implement the smallest fix, rerun the witness, and run\n only directly relevant surrounding checks unless broader validation is\n explicitly requested.\n6. **Stop on Green**: When the witness passes and the requested scope is\n satisfied, stop. Do not inspect more PR comments, audit more files, or clean\n unrelated residue without a new executable claim.\n\nIf unrelated failures remain, isolate them in the final report instead of\nabsorbing them into the task. Report files changed, symbols or behavior changed,\nwitness commands, pass/fail results, and intentional non-actions such as no\ncommit, no push, or no PR comment.\n\n## End of Turn Checklist\n\nAfter altering files:\n\n1. **Verify Truth**: Ensure documentation is updated if behavior or structure changed.\n2. **Log Debt**: Add follow-on backlog items to `bad-code/` or `cool-ideas/`.\n3. **Commit**: Use focused, conventional commit messages. Propose a draft before executing.\n4. **Validate**: Run `cargo check` and relevant tests.\n\n---\n\n**The goal is inevitability. Every feature is defined by its tests.**\n\n",{"_369":420,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":421,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":422,"_90":377},[423,424],"developer",{"_45":426,"_90":411},{"_45":425,"_90":411},"\n## Skills\nA skill is a set of local instructions to follow that is stored in a `SKILL.md` file. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and file path so you can open the source for full instructions when using a specific skill.\n### Available skills\n- imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)\n- openai-docs: Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools, use bundled references only as helper context, and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)\n- plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional plugin folders/files, and baseline placeholders you can edit before publishing or testing. Use when Codex needs to create a new local plugin, add optional plugin structure, or generate or update repo-root `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` entries for plugin ordering and availability metadata. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/plugin-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-creator: Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-installer: Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos). (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/SKILL.md)\n### How to use skills\n- Discovery: The list above is the skills available in this session (name + description + file path). Skill bodies live on disk at the listed paths.\n- Trigger rules: If the user names a skill (with `$SkillName` or plain text) OR the task clearly matches a skill's description shown above, you must use that skill for that turn. Multiple mentions mean use them all. Do not carry skills across turns unless re-mentioned.\n- Missing/blocked: If a named skill isn't in the list or the path can't be read, say so briefly and continue with the best fallback.\n- How to use a skill (progressive disclosure):\n 1) After deciding to use a skill, open its `SKILL.md`. Read only enough to follow the workflow.\n 2) When `SKILL.md` references relative paths (e.g., `scripts/foo.py`), resolve them relative to the skill directory listed above first, and only consider other paths if needed.\n 3) If `SKILL.md` points to extra folders such as `references/`, load only the specific files needed for the request; don't bulk-load everything.\n 4) If `scripts/` exist, prefer running or patching them instead of retyping large code blocks.\n 5) If `assets/` or templates exist, reuse them instead of recreating from scratch.\n- Coordination and sequencing:\n - If multiple skills apply, choose the minimal set that covers the request and state the order you'll use them.\n - Announce which skill(s) you're using and why (one short line). If you skip an obvious skill, say why.\n- Context hygiene:\n - Keep context small: summarize long sections instead of pasting them; only load extra files when needed.\n - Avoid deep reference-chasing: prefer opening only files directly linked from `SKILL.md` unless you're blocked.\n - When variants exist (frameworks, providers, domains), pick only the relevant reference file(s) and note that choice.\n- Safety and fallback: If a skill can't be applied cleanly (missing files, unclear instructions), state the issue, pick the next-best approach, and continue.\n","\nFilesystem sandboxing defines which files can be read or written. `sandbox_mode` is `danger-full-access`: No filesystem sandboxing - all commands are permitted. Network access is enabled.\nApproval policy is currently never. Do not provide the `sandbox_permissions` for any reason, commands will be rejected.\n","turn/started",{"_350":351,"_85":429},{"_101":-5,"_41":357,"_358":430,"_360":361,"_362":431},[],"inProgress",{"_362":433,"_350":351},{"_434":435,"_90":436},"activeFlags",[],"active","thread/started",{"_439":440},"thread",{"_441":-5,"_442":-5,"_443":444,"_445":361,"_446":447,"_448":15,"_449":-5,"_450":-5,"_41":351,"_451":452,"_179":-5,"_159":453,"_454":207,"_455":456,"_362":457,"_75":458,"_459":361},"agentNickname","agentRole","cliVersion","0.124.0","createdAt","cwd","/workspace/echo","ephemeral","forkedFromId","gitInfo","modelProvider","openai","/opt/codex/sessions/2026/05/25/rollout-2026-05-25T17-33-00-019e6032-7652-7101-8836-5c1b6abe1294.jsonl","preview","source","vscode",{"_90":366},[],"updatedAt",[],"messages",[463],{"_41":464,"_465":466,"_467":468,"_469":468,"_372":470,"_362":471,"_374":-5,"_472":31,"_473":474,"_475":476,"_477":-5},"e9af02d2-fa62-4db7-b711-556a783cc97b","author",{"_94":321,"_179":-5,"_473":486},"create_time",1779730379.793456,"update_time",{"_482":45,"_483":484},"finished_successfully","weight","metadata",{"_478":479},"recipient","all","channel","l1239dk1",{"_480":481},"inline_comments",[],"content_type","parts",[485],"@codex Activity Summary for PR #379 review cleanup\n\n| Source | Severity | File | Issue | Resolution | Commit | Verification |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Codex/CodeRabbit | P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | Scheduler tick WAL writes could leave partial tick evidence from a failed multi-head pass. | Runtime WAL is snapshotted and restored on any tick WAL publication failure; multi-head regression covers rollback of every tick record. | `1f596c8` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n| CodeRabbit | P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | `NoMatchingReceiptEntry` was persisted as lawful `Obstructed` evidence. | Added a RED/GREEN regression and now returns `TrustedRuntimeWalError::TickOutcomeUnavailable` so the pass rolls back. | `0893903` | `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib trusted_runtime_host::tests::runtime_wal_tick_decision` |\n| Codex | P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | Recovery certificate index root was not bound to rebuilt index contents. | Recovery certificate root now uses `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root(...)` over rebuilt submission and receipt indexes. | `1f596c8` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n| CodeRabbit | P3 | `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` | Text output omitted the canonical envelope digest for the inspected submission/envelope pair. | Added `Canonical envelope` to text output and a CLI integration regression. | `a3c2ef7` | `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_text_reports_canonical_envelope_digest` |\n| CodeRabbit | P3 | `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` | Recovery posture docs omitted `RecoveryFaulted`. | Documented `RecoveryFaulted` and named `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` as the authoritative label source for this fixture. | `add115d` | `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` |\n| Self/CodeRabbit | P4 | `docs/BEARING.md` | Top-level signpost timestamp was stale. | Updated `Last updated` to 2026-05-25. | `add115d` | `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md` |\n| CodeRabbit | P4 | `CHANGELOG.md` | Changelog guarantees were questioned before all regressions landed. | No downgrade needed after fixes: the multi-head rollback, invariant-error classification, and recovered-index-root witnesses are now green. | `1f596c8`, `0893903` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n\nValidation run after fixes:\n\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n- `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_text_reports_canonical_envelope_digest`\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `git diff --check`\n- pre-push exact Rust slices for `warp-cli` and `warp-core`\nfeat(core): commit runtime WAL ACK evidence\n\n## Summary\n- commit trusted runtime tick receipts and receipt correlations through host-owned runtime WAL transactions before product-facing receipt publication\n- expose read-only runtime WAL recovery indexes and certificates for submission/receipt posture without scheduler callbacks\n- add `echo-cli wal submission-posture` for generic recovered submission posture JSON\n- add `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` as the narrow WAL ACK readiness and stale-claim gate\n\n## Tests\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --test trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_json_reports`\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n- `cargo xtask man-pages --check`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md`\n- `git diff --check`\n\n## Notes\n- Echo stays generic: recovered submission posture exposes submission, ticket, receipt, and durability posture without importing jedit/editor nouns.\n- This closes BEARING slices 90-95 and is intended as the Runtime WAL ACK Integration PR boundary.\n\n\n## Summary by CodeRabbit\n\n* **New Features**\n * Added a read-only WAL inspection command to report recovery posture for a specific submission/envelope pair (JSON/text output with posture labels and optional digest fields).\n * Added a targeted test-slice workflow for runtime WAL ACK validation.\n\n* **Documentation**\n * Added man page and docs describing the WAL recovery posture command and updated WAL ACK release-gate guidance.\n\n* **Tests**\n * Added unit and integration tests covering CLI parsing, submission-posture outputs, WAL tick/rollback and read-only recovery behavior.\n\n\n\n[![Review Change Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/flyingrobots/echo/pull/379?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Review limit reached\n> \n> `@flyingrobots`, we couldn't start this review because you've used your available PR reviews for now.\n> \n> Your plan includes 1 review of capacity. Refill in 43 minutes and 27 seconds.\n> \n> Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> After more review capacity refills, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\n> \n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\n> \n>

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\n> \n> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, review capacity refills continuously over time.\n> \n> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n> \n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `c4c694b7-5a04-4fb6-81ea-679492adf5ab`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01 and add115d089de856a2499c4824fec393bc7dc7df2.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

\n> \n> * `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`\n> * `crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`\n> * `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\n> * `docs/BEARING.md`\n> * `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n\n\n\n\n\n

📝 Walkthrough

\n\n## Walkthrough\n\nAdds `echo-cli wal submission-posture` to report read-only WAL recovery posture for a submission/envelope pair; records scheduler tick receipts into runtime WAL with rollback on failure; provides read-only recovery APIs that rebuild submission and receipt indexes; adds tests, docs, man pages, and xtask automation for the runtime-wal-ack slice.\n\n## Changes\n\n**Runtime WAL ACK Integration**\n\n|Layer / File(s)|Summary|\n|---|---|\n|**CLI contract and parsing**
`crates/warp-cli/src/cli.rs`|New `WalCommands::SubmissionPosture` variant accepts root path, submission ID, and canonical envelope digest as hex strings, with unit test validating argument parsing.|\n|**CLI wiring and submission_posture handler**
`crates/warp-cli/src/main.rs`, `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`|Wires subcommand in main; implements `submission_posture()` handler, output struct, hex parsing, posture-label helpers, and emits text/JSON output.|\n|**CLI integration tests & WAL fixture**
`crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`|Adds `filesystem_wal_with_decided_submission()` fixture and integration tests asserting `wal submission-posture --format json` behavior and `wal --help` includes the topic.|\n|**Docs, man pages, and changelog**
`docs/man/echo-cli-wal-submission-posture.1`, `docs/man/echo-cli-wal.1`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `docs/BEARING.md`, `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`, `docs/workflows.md`|Adds man page for the new command, updates `echo-cli wal` man page, changelog and design docs to describe the generic recovery posture contract and runtime-wal-ack slice, and updates workflows.|\n|**Xtask test-slice automation**
`xtask/src/main.rs`|Adds `TestSlice::RuntimeWalAck`, builds a command sequence to run focused tests, stale-claim grep, and man-page check; includes unit tests validating produced commands and doc freshness.|\n|**Recovered index root hashing**
`crates/warp-core/src/causal_wal.rs`|Adds `WAL_RECOVERED_INDEX_ROOT_DOMAIN` and `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root()` that deterministically hashes recovered submission and receipt index contents with posture codes.|\n|**Trusted runtime WAL model & errors**
`crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`|Expand imports; add `TrustedRuntimeWalError` recovery and tick-evidence variants; introduce `TrustedRuntimeWalRecovery` bundling certificate and rebuilt submission/receipt indexes.|\n|**Tick recording, recovery APIs, and helpers**
`crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`|`tick_once` snapshots/rolls back runtime/provenance on failure, derives `WalTickDecision`, records per-tick receipt WAL transactions with frontier digest updates; adds `recover_read_only()`, `scheduler_tick_count()`, `record_tick_receipt()`, decision/digest helpers, and recovery-certificate builder with unit tests.|\n|**Trusted runtime host loop tests**
`crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`|Adds `runtime_pair()` and tests for tick commit-before-publish, WAL overflow rollback (single and multi-head), read-only recovery rebuilding posture and ticket mappings, and recovery certificate LSN/counter assertions.|\n\n## Sequence Diagram(s)\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Host as TrustedRuntimeHost\n participant Scheduler as SchedulerCoordinator\n participant WAL as TrustedRuntimeWal\n Host->>Host: snapshot runtime & provenance\n Host->>Scheduler: super_tick()\n Scheduler-->>Host: intent outcome + new receipt correlations\n Host->>WAL: record_tick_receipt(decision, correlations, frontiers)\n WAL->>WAL: build SchedulerTick transaction\n WAL->>WAL: append transaction to store\n WAL->>WAL: update receipt & runtime-state frontier digests\n alt WAL append failure\n Host->>Host: rollback runtime & provenance\n end\n Host-->>Host: return tick result\n```\n\n## Estimated code review effort\n\n🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes\n\n## Possibly related PRs\n\n- [flyingrobots/echo#145](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/pull/145): Introduces tick-receipt/decision-digest primitives used by this PR.\n- [flyingrobots/echo#148](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/pull/148): Related scheduler tick/receipt machinery changes that interact with tick receipt construction and recording.\n\n## Suggested labels\n\n`tooling`\n\n## Poem\n\n> WAL-backed ticks commit before they publish, \n> Recovery scans rebuild the indexed truth; \n> CLI reports posture, digest, and trace, \n> Tests guard rollback, multi-head, and race. 🎯\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

\n\n### ❌ Failed checks (1 warning)\n\n| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |\n| :----------------: | :--------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| Docstring Coverage | ⚠️ Warning | Docstring coverage is 70.69% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. | Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold. |\n\n

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

\n\n_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\n\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\n\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `stack/runtime-wal-tick-receipts`\n\n

\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n---\n\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/echo&utm_content=379)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\n\n

❤️ Share

\n\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\n\n

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Roll back WAL appends when a later tick WAL write fails**\n\nIf one `super_tick` pass produces multiple new receipt correlations, this loop can append some scheduler-tick WAL transactions before a later append fails; on failure it restores only `runtime` and `provenance`, so earlier WAL commits from the same pass remain durable. That leaves recovery indexes showing decided receipts that were rolled back from live runtime state, violating the commit-before-publish atomicity this change is trying to enforce (e.g., partial success followed by `LsnOverflow` or store error on a later correlation).\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `13690936e8`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n
\n\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\n- Open a pull request for review\n- Mark a draft as ready\n- Comment \"@codex review\".\n\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\n\n\n\n\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \"@codex address that feedback\".\n \n

\n_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Include canonical envelope digest in text output.**\n\nLine [91] omits `canonical_envelope_digest` in text mode, so the reported posture is ambiguous for the queried `(submission_id, envelope)` pair.\n\n \n\n

Proposed patch

\n\n```diff\n- let text = format!(\n- \"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\nRoot: {}\\nSubmission: {}\\nRetry posture: {}\\nRecovered posture: {}\\nReceipt: {}\\nTicket: {}\\n\",\n+ let text = format!(\n+ \"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\nRoot: {}\\nSubmission: {}\\nCanonical envelope: {}\\nRetry posture: {}\\nRecovered posture: {}\\nReceipt: {}\\nTicket: {}\\n\",\n output.root,\n output.submission_id,\n+ output.canonical_envelope_digest,\n output.retry_posture,\n output.recovered_posture.unwrap_or(\"None\"),\n output.receipt_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\"),\n output.ticket_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\")\n );\n```\n

\n\n\n\n

📝 Committable suggestion

\n\n> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**\n> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.\n\n```suggestion\n let text = format!(\n \"echo-cli wal submission-posture\\nRoot: {}\\nSubmission: {}\\nCanonical envelope: {}\\nRetry posture: {}\\nRecovered posture: {}\\nReceipt: {}\\nTicket: {}\\n\",\n output.root,\n output.submission_id,\n output.canonical_envelope_digest,\n output.retry_posture,\n output.recovered_posture.unwrap_or(\"None\"),\n output.receipt_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\"),\n output.ticket_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\")\n );\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` around lines 90 - 98, The formatted text assigned\nto the variable `text` in `wal.rs` is missing the `canonical_envelope_digest`,\nso update the format string and its argument list to include that field (e.g.,\nadd a \"Canonical envelope: {}\" line) and pass\n`output.canonical_envelope_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\")` alongside the\nother `output.*` arguments to ensure the canonical envelope digest is printed in\ntext mode.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\n_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _🏗️ Heavy lift_\n\n**Partial WAL failure leaves committed records without runtime rollback.**\n\nIf `super_tick` produces multiple correlations and `record_tick_receipt` fails on the second or subsequent record, the first WAL record(s) remain committed while `runtime` and `provenance` are rolled back. On recovery, the WAL shows submissions decided but in-memory state doesn't reflect them.\n\nOptions:\n1. Batch all tick receipts into a single atomic WAL transaction.\n2. Track which WAL records were written and roll them back on partial failure (would require WAL support for uncommitting).\n3. Document that partial failure is unsupported and the in-memory adapter is only valid for single-correlation ticks.\n\nGiven this is the reference test adapter, option 3 may suffice for now, but production adapters should consider atomicity.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 277 - 287, Partial\nWAL failure can leave some tick WAL records committed while runtime/provenance\nare rolled back; to avoid inconsistent state in this reference test adapter,\nenforce or document that multi-correlation ticks are unsupported when a WAL is\nin use: in the code path around runtime_wal and tick_wal_records (check the\nblock using self.runtime_wal.as_mut(), runtime_wal.record_tick_receipt,\ntick_wal_records, runtime_before, provenance_before and the super_tick caller),\neither (A) add a guard that returns an explicit error if tick_wal_records\ncontains more than one entry when self.runtime_wal.is_some(), or (B) add a clear\ninline comment and documentation stating that only single-correlation ticks are\nsupported with this adapter and that production adapters must provide atomic WAL\nsemantics; pick (A) for safety in tests or (B) if you prefer a\ndocumentation-only change.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commit 1f596c8\n**Actionable comments posted: 2**\n\n> [!CAUTION]\n> Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.\n> \n> \n> \n>

\n>

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

\n> \n>
\n>
docs/BEARING.md (1)
\n> \n> `6-6`: _⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n> \n> **Update stale document timestamp metadata.**\n> \n> Line 6 still says `Last updated: 2026-05-24.` even though this PR updates the file on May 25, 2026. Please bump it to the actual update date to keep roadmap metadata trustworthy.\n> \n> \n> \n> As per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees and related references.\n> \n>
\n>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
\n> \n> ```\n> Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\n> rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n> \n> In `@docs/BEARING.md` at line 6, Update the stale timestamp string \"Last updated:\n> 2026-05-24.\" in the BEARING.md document to the correct date \"Last updated:\n> 2026-05-25.\" so the document metadata matches this PR's update; locate the\n> literal \"Last updated: 2026-05-24.\" and replace it with the new date.\n> ```\n> \n>
\n> \n>
\n> \n>

\n\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nInline comments:\nIn `@crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`:\n- Around line 90-98: The formatted text assigned to the variable `text` in\n`wal.rs` is missing the `canonical_envelope_digest`, so update the format string\nand its argument list to include that field (e.g., add a \"Canonical envelope:\n{}\" line) and pass\n`output.canonical_envelope_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\")` alongside the\nother `output.*` arguments to ensure the canonical envelope digest is printed in\ntext mode.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`:\n- Around line 277-287: Partial WAL failure can leave some tick WAL records\ncommitted while runtime/provenance are rolled back; to avoid inconsistent state\nin this reference test adapter, enforce or document that multi-correlation ticks\nare unsupported when a WAL is in use: in the code path around runtime_wal and\ntick_wal_records (check the block using self.runtime_wal.as_mut(),\nruntime_wal.record_tick_receipt, tick_wal_records, runtime_before,\nprovenance_before and the super_tick caller), either (A) add a guard that\nreturns an explicit error if tick_wal_records contains more than one entry when\nself.runtime_wal.is_some(), or (B) add a clear inline comment and documentation\nstating that only single-correlation ticks are supported with this adapter and\nthat production adapters must provide atomic WAL semantics; pick (A) for safety\nin tests or (B) if you prefer a documentation-only change.\n\n---\n\nOutside diff comments:\nIn `@docs/BEARING.md`:\n- Line 6: Update the stale timestamp string \"Last updated: 2026-05-24.\" in the\nBEARING.md document to the correct date \"Last updated: 2026-05-25.\" so the\ndocument metadata matches this PR's update; locate the literal \"Last updated:\n2026-05-24.\" and replace it with the new date.\n```\n\n

\n\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\n\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\n\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

ℹ️ Review info

\n\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\n\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n\n**Plan**: Pro\n\n**Run ID**: `484f6967-5f70-450a-a49a-ef19e05caeeb`\n\n

\n\n

📥 Commits

\n\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 363fd86739ba4a37ba19f5a25fdd7a98838085d7 and 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358.\n\n

\n\n

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\n\n* `CHANGELOG.md`\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/cli.rs`\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/main.rs`\n* `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`\n* `crates/warp-cli/tests/cli_integration.rs`\n* `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\n* `crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`\n* `docs/BEARING.md`\n* `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n* `docs/man/echo-cli-wal-submission-posture.1`\n* `docs/man/echo-cli-wal.1`\n* `docs/workflows.md`\n* `xtask/src/main.rs`\n\n

\n\n

\n\n\n@codex self-review findings for PR #379. Please confirm or challenge the severity/mitigation before we merge.\n\n| Severity | File / lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended mitigation prompt |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:277-285`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:534-536` | Scheduler tick WAL recording is not failure-atomic across a multi-head `super_tick`. | `tick_once` appends one scheduler-tick WAL transaction per new receipt correlation. If an earlier `record_tick_receipt(...)` succeeds and a later one fails, the code restores `runtime`/`provenance` but leaves the earlier WAL transaction and WAL frontier advances committed. `super_tick` can emit multiple records in one pass, so recovery may see tick evidence for a runtime state that was rolled back. | Add a regression with two independent heads in one `super_tick` and an injected failure on the second tick WAL record; assert `scheduler_tick_count() == 0` and recovered receipt/submission indexes contain no tick decision. Then make tick WAL recording atomic for the whole attempted scheduler pass: prebuild all tick transactions before append and restore/checkpoint `TrustedRuntimeWal` on failure, or introduce a batch append boundary whose failure cannot leave partial scheduler-tick evidence. |\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:735-748` | Internal receipt-correlation inconsistency is converted into `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation(...)` returns `Obstructed` when `observe_intent_outcome(...)` is not `Decided` or when the observed receipt digest does not match the correlation being recorded. Those are internal consistency failures for this path, not lawful obstruction outcomes, and recording them as `Obstructed` makes recovery evidence look normal. | Change the helper to return `Result` and treat non-decided/mismatched correlation as a runtime/WAL invariant error that rolls back the attempted tick publication. Add regressions for missing observation and receipt-digest mismatch proving no scheduler-tick WAL transaction is committed. |\n| P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:404-412`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:835-856` | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` does not bind recovered index contents. | `recover_read_only()` rebuilds `submissions` and `receipts`, but `runtime_wal_recovery_certificate(&report)` computes `recovered_indexes_root` only from transaction ids and commit digests. The certificate can therefore remain unchanged even if index reconstruction is wrong, incomplete, or later refactored incorrectly. | Compute the runtime WAL recovered index root from the rebuilt `RecoveredSubmissionIndex` and `RecoveredReceiptIndex` entries, not just the scan report. Add a test that proves the certificate root changes when recovered submission/receipt index content changes and that it includes posture, ticket, receipt, and envelope identity. |\n| P2 | `docs/BEARING.md:992-998`, `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md:127-133` | BEARING overclaims the cross-repo jedit fixture as complete. | Slice 94 is checked and its test plan says the sibling `jedit` fixture consumes generic Echo recovery JSON. This PR adds the Echo CLI posture surface and the release-gate doc says jedit *may* call it, but no sibling jedit fixture is included here. | Either uncheck/reword Slice 94 as “Echo recovery posture contract” and add a follow-on jedit fixture slice, or land the actual sibling jedit fixture before claiming the slice complete. Keep the PR description aligned with whichever truth is chosen. |\n\nLocal validation while reviewing:\n\n- `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n\n\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `13690936e8`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Make scheduler tick WAL writes failure-atomic**\n\nWhen `tick_once` records multiple new correlations from one `super_tick`, a failure on a later `record_tick_receipt` only restores `runtime`/`provenance` and returns, but any earlier tick WAL commits in the same loop remain durable. In a multi-head pass this can leave committed scheduler-tick evidence for state that was rolled back, so recovery can report decided/advanced receipt posture that never became visible in runtime.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Fail on invariant mismatch instead of recording Obstructed**\n\nThis helper maps non-`Decided` observations and receipt-digest mismatches to `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`, which turns internal consistency failures on the host WAL publication path into apparently lawful obstruction outcomes. If this path is ever hit (e.g., future refactor/regression), recovery evidence will look normal instead of surfacing a broken runtime/WAL invariant and aborting the publish attempt.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Bind recovered index root to recovered index contents**\n\n`recovered_indexes_root` is derived only from transaction ids and commit digests, not from the rebuilt submission/receipt index entries. That means the certificate’s index root can stay unchanged even if index reconstruction logic produces different contents, weakening the certificate as evidence of recovered posture correctness.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n@codex resolved the self-review findings in `1f596c8`.\n\n| Severity | Finding | Resolution | Commit |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| P1 | Scheduler tick WAL recording was not failure-atomic across multi-head `super_tick`. | Added `runtime_wal_ack_multi_head_tick_failure_rolls_back_all_tick_records`; `TrustedRuntimeHost::tick_once` now snapshots `TrustedRuntimeWal` before scheduler-tick publication and restores it, runtime, and provenance on any tick WAL failure. | `1f596c8` |\n| P1 | Receipt-correlation invariant mismatch was encoded as normal `Obstructed` evidence. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation` now returns `Result`; pending/missing outcomes and receipt-digest mismatches become typed invariant errors. Added unit witnesses for pending, mismatch, and matching decisions. | `1f596c8` |\n| P2 | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` did not bind rebuilt index contents. | Added `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root(...)` over recovered submission and receipt indexes; `TrustedRuntimeWalRecovery` certificates now use that root, with assertion coverage in the runtime WAL recovery test. | `1f596c8` |\n| P2 | BEARING overclaimed the sibling jedit fixture as complete. | Reworded Slice 94 as the Echo recovery posture contract and marked the sibling jedit fixture as the next cross-repo consumer witness. | `1f596c8` |\n\nValidation after the fix:\n\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib trusted_runtime_host::tests::runtime_wal_tick_decision`\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --test trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo clippy -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib -- -D warnings`\n- `cargo check -p xtask`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `git diff --check`\n\n### Summary\n* Added the canonical envelope digest to `echo-cli wal submission-posture` text output so text mode now identifies the exact `(submission, envelope)` pair being reported. [crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rsL90-L99](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs#L90-L99)\n* Updated `docs/BEARING.md` metadata timestamp from `2026-05-24` to `2026-05-25` to match the current update date. [docs/BEARING.mdL6](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/docs/BEARING.md#L6)\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_json_reports`\n* ✅ `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md`\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a14841321d88191b3eb18000266a5f7)\n_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Avoid shipping these as completed guarantees until code/tests prove them.**\n\nThis entry asserts three high-risk behaviors that are still called out as unresolved in PR context (multi-head tick WAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-content-bound recovery certificate root). Please downgrade wording to “targeted/expected” or split into follow-up items until the fixes and regressions land. \n \nAs per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@CHANGELOG.md` around lines 540 - 544, The changelog sentence claiming\n\"Runtime WAL-backed scheduler ticks now roll back all tick WAL evidence...,\ntreat missing or mismatched receipt correlation evidence as an invariant\nerror..., and bind runtime recovery certificates to rebuilt submission and\nreceipt indexes\" overstates guarantees; change the wording to a tentative form\n(e.g., \"targeted/expected\" or \"planned\") or split into three follow-up items\nuntil code/tests validate them: specifically update the phrases \"roll back all\ntick WAL evidence\", \"treat ... as an invariant error\", and \"bind ...\ncertificates to rebuilt ... indexes\" to indicate they are intended/targeted\nbehaviors or move each as a separate pending/experimental bullet referencing the\nmulti-head tick WAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-bound\nrecovery certificate workstreams.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Do not persist `NoMatchingReceiptEntry` as a lawful obstruction.**\n\n`IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry` means the correlation exists but the retained receipt cannot reproduce it, so this is an invariant break, not an `Obstructed` scheduler outcome. Recording it as `WalTickDecision::Obstructed` will commit corrupted tick evidence instead of rolling the pass back. Return a `TrustedRuntimeWalError` here and add a regression for this branch.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 791 - 798, The\nmatch currently maps IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed which incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence;\nchange this arm to return an Err(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...))\n(or an appropriate TrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed so the pass is rolled back rather than recorded,\nupdate the surrounding function signature/propagation if needed to return\nTrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a regression test that triggers\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to assert the error is returned\n(not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\n_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Document the full recovered posture label set (or mark this list explicitly non-exhaustive).**\n\n`echo-cli wal submission-posture` can emit `RecoveryFaulted` (`crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`, recovered_posture_label), but this section lists only five classifications. That mismatch can cause incorrect jedit adapter mapping logic. \n \nAs per coding guidelines, documentation touching determinism/recovery contracts must stay factually accurate.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` around lines 128 - 133, The doc\ncurrently lists five recovered posture labels but omits RecoveryFaulted which\necho-cli wal submission-posture (see recovered_posture_label in\ncrates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs) can emit; update the section describing the\nrecovered posture label set (and/or mark it explicitly non-exhaustive) so jedit\nfixture authors mapping logic in the Echo adapter accounts for RecoveryFaulted\nas well as the five existing labels (not accepted, accepted pending, decided\napplied, decided rejected, obstructed), and state the authoritative source of\ntruth for this enum to keep the contract deterministic.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d\n**Actionable comments posted: 3**\n\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nInline comments:\nIn `@CHANGELOG.md`:\n- Around line 540-544: The changelog sentence claiming \"Runtime WAL-backed\nscheduler ticks now roll back all tick WAL evidence..., treat missing or\nmismatched receipt correlation evidence as an invariant error..., and bind\nruntime recovery certificates to rebuilt submission and receipt indexes\"\noverstates guarantees; change the wording to a tentative form (e.g.,\n\"targeted/expected\" or \"planned\") or split into three follow-up items until\ncode/tests validate them: specifically update the phrases \"roll back all tick\nWAL evidence\", \"treat ... as an invariant error\", and \"bind ... certificates to\nrebuilt ... indexes\" to indicate they are intended/targeted behaviors or move\neach as a separate pending/experimental bullet referencing the multi-head tick\nWAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-bound recovery\ncertificate workstreams.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`:\n- Around line 791-798: The match currently maps\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to WalTickDecision::Obstructed\nwhich incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence; change this arm to return an\nErr(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...)) (or an appropriate\nTrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of WalTickDecision::Obstructed so the\npass is rolled back rather than recorded, update the surrounding function\nsignature/propagation if needed to return TrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a\nregression test that triggers IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\nassert the error is returned (not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\n\nIn `@docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`:\n- Around line 128-133: The doc currently lists five recovered posture labels but\nomits RecoveryFaulted which echo-cli wal submission-posture (see\nrecovered_posture_label in crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs) can emit; update the\nsection describing the recovered posture label set (and/or mark it explicitly\nnon-exhaustive) so jedit fixture authors mapping logic in the Echo adapter\naccounts for RecoveryFaulted as well as the five existing labels (not accepted,\naccepted pending, decided applied, decided rejected, obstructed), and state the\nauthoritative source of truth for this enum to keep the contract deterministic.\n```\n\n

\n\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\n\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\n\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

ℹ️ Review info

\n\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\n\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n\n**Plan**: Pro\n\n**Run ID**: `8b5ce4ad-d184-425f-b09a-481cebf4af3b`\n\n

\n\n

📥 Commits

\n\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358 and 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01.\n\n

\n\n

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

\n\n* `CHANGELOG.md`\n* `crates/warp-core/src/causal_wal.rs`\n* `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`\n* `crates/warp-core/tests/trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests.rs`\n* `docs/BEARING.md`\n* `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n* `docs/workflows.md`\n* `xtask/src/main.rs`\n\n

\n\n

\n\n",{},"created",1779730399.4870777,"Completing the task","event_type","info",{"_90":377,"_94":91,"_372":497},{"_90":494,"_495":496},"partial_repo_snapshot","files",[],[498],{"_482":45,"_45":379},{"_90":321,"_41":82,"_94":321,"_501":502,"_503":504,"_505":506,"_130":-5,"_117":507},[81],"input_items",[525,526,527,528,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543],"external_post_config",{"_508":509,"_260":194,"_510":301,"_271":-5,"_511":254,"_512":-5,"_513":514,"_515":516,"_517":-5,"_518":-5,"_519":520,"_521":15,"_522":57,"_523":52,"_524":15},"user_model_slug","slug",1779730373.173252,"installation_id",89912914,"pr_number","repo_id","review_trigger","comment_id",4536059463,"comment_type","issue","pr_write_guard_token","pending_pr_reaction_id","pending_comment_reaction_id",361467936,"comment_if_no_findings","comment_on_error","share_url","is_parallel_review",{"_90":377,"_94":321,"_372":576},{"_308":309,"_310":311,"_573":315,"_574":127,"_317":-5,"_90":575},{"_90":544,"_310":572,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":571,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":562},{"_90":544,"_310":563,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":568,"_159":569,"_546":550,"_547":570},{"_90":544,"_310":566,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":567},{"_90":544,"_310":565,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":564,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":563,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":561,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":562},{"_90":544,"_310":560,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":559,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":558,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":557,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":554,"_159":555,"_546":550,"_547":556},{"_90":544,"_310":551,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":553},{"_90":544,"_310":548,"_159":549,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":545,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},"pull_request_comment","**Actionable comments posted: 3**\n\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nInline comments:\nIn `@CHANGELOG.md`:\n- Around line 540-544: The changelog sentence claiming \"Runtime WAL-backed\nscheduler ticks now roll back all tick WAL evidence..., treat missing or\nmismatched receipt correlation evidence as an invariant error..., and bind\nruntime recovery certificates to rebuilt submission and receipt indexes\"\noverstates guarantees; change the wording to a tentative form (e.g.,\n\"targeted/expected\" or \"planned\") or split into three follow-up items until\ncode/tests validate them: specifically update the phrases \"roll back all tick\nWAL evidence\", \"treat ... as an invariant error\", and \"bind ... certificates to\nrebuilt ... indexes\" to indicate they are intended/targeted behaviors or move\neach as a separate pending/experimental bullet referencing the multi-head tick\nWAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-bound recovery\ncertificate workstreams.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs`:\n- Around line 791-798: The match currently maps\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to WalTickDecision::Obstructed\nwhich incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence; change this arm to return an\nErr(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...)) (or an appropriate\nTrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of WalTickDecision::Obstructed so the\npass is rolled back rather than recorded, update the surrounding function\nsignature/propagation if needed to return TrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a\nregression test that triggers IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\nassert the error is returned (not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\n\nIn `@docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`:\n- Around line 128-133: The doc currently lists five recovered posture labels but\nomits RecoveryFaulted which echo-cli wal submission-posture (see\nrecovered_posture_label in crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs) can emit; update the\nsection describing the recovered posture label set (and/or mark it explicitly\nnon-exhaustive) so jedit fixture authors mapping logic in the Echo adapter\naccounts for RecoveryFaulted as well as the five existing labels (not accepted,\naccepted pending, decided applied, decided rejected, obstructed), and state the\nauthoritative source of truth for this enum to keep the contract deterministic.\n```\n\n

\n\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\n\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\n\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

ℹ️ Review info

\n\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\n\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n\n**Plan**: Pro\n\n**Run ID**: `8b5ce4ad-d184-425f-b09a-481cebf4af3b`\n\n

\n\n

📥 Commits

\n\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358 and 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01.\n\n

\n\n

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

\n\n

\n\n","side","line","_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Document the full recovered posture label set (or mark this list explicitly non-exhaustive).**\n\n`echo-cli wal submission-posture` can emit `RecoveryFaulted` (`crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs`, recovered_posture_label), but this section lists only five classifications. That mismatch can cause incorrect jedit adapter mapping logic. \n \nAs per coding guidelines, documentation touching determinism/recovery contracts must stay factually accurate.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d","docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md","RIGHT","_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Do not persist `NoMatchingReceiptEntry` as a lawful obstruction.**\n\n`IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry` means the correlation exists but the retained receipt cannot reproduce it, so this is an invariant break, not an `Obstructed` scheduler outcome. Recording it as `WalTickDecision::Obstructed` will commit corrupted tick evidence instead of rolling the pass back. Return a `TrustedRuntimeWalError` here and add a regression for this branch.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 791 - 798, The\nmatch currently maps IntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed which incorrectly persists corrupted tick evidence;\nchange this arm to return an Err(TrustedRuntimeWalError::InvariantBroken(...))\n(or an appropriate TrustedRuntimeWalError variant) instead of\nWalTickDecision::Obstructed so the pass is rolled back rather than recorded,\nupdate the surrounding function signature/propagation if needed to return\nTrustedRuntimeWalError, and add a regression test that triggers\nIntentOutcomeDecision::NoMatchingReceiptEntry to assert the error is returned\n(not WalTickDecision::Obstructed).\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d","crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs",803,"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Avoid shipping these as completed guarantees until code/tests prove them.**\n\nThis entry asserts three high-risk behaviors that are still called out as unresolved in PR context (multi-head tick WAL atomicity, invariant-error classification, and index-content-bound recovery certificate root). Please downgrade wording to “targeted/expected” or split into follow-up items until the fixes and regressions land. \n \nAs per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n\n\n","CHANGELOG.md",544,"### Summary\n* Added the canonical envelope digest to `echo-cli wal submission-posture` text output so text mode now identifies the exact `(submission, envelope)` pair being reported. [crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rsL90-L99](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs#L90-L99)\n* Updated `docs/BEARING.md` metadata timestamp from `2026-05-24` to `2026-05-25` to match the current update date. [docs/BEARING.mdL6](https://github.com/flyingrobots/echo/blob/1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01/docs/BEARING.md#L6)\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_json_reports`\n* ✅ `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md`\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a14841321d88191b3eb18000266a5f7)","@codex resolved the self-review findings in `1f596c8`.\n\n| Severity | Finding | Resolution | Commit |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| P1 | Scheduler tick WAL recording was not failure-atomic across multi-head `super_tick`. | Added `runtime_wal_ack_multi_head_tick_failure_rolls_back_all_tick_records`; `TrustedRuntimeHost::tick_once` now snapshots `TrustedRuntimeWal` before scheduler-tick publication and restores it, runtime, and provenance on any tick WAL failure. | `1f596c8` |\n| P1 | Receipt-correlation invariant mismatch was encoded as normal `Obstructed` evidence. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation` now returns `Result`; pending/missing outcomes and receipt-digest mismatches become typed invariant errors. Added unit witnesses for pending, mismatch, and matching decisions. | `1f596c8` |\n| P2 | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` did not bind rebuilt index contents. | Added `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root(...)` over recovered submission and receipt indexes; `TrustedRuntimeWalRecovery` certificates now use that root, with assertion coverage in the runtime WAL recovery test. | `1f596c8` |\n| P2 | BEARING overclaimed the sibling jedit fixture as complete. | Reworded Slice 94 as the Echo recovery posture contract and marked the sibling jedit fixture as the next cross-repo consumer witness. | `1f596c8` |\n\nValidation after the fix:\n\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib trusted_runtime_host::tests::runtime_wal_tick_decision`\n- `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --test trusted_runtime_host_loop_tests runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\n- `cargo clippy -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib -- -D warnings`\n- `cargo check -p xtask`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `git diff --check`\n","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Bind recovered index root to recovered index contents**\n\n`recovered_indexes_root` is derived only from transaction ids and commit digests, not from the rebuilt submission/receipt index entries. That means the certificate’s index root can stay unchanged even if index reconstruction logic produces different contents, weakening the certificate as evidence of recovered posture correctness.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Fail on invariant mismatch instead of recording Obstructed**\n\nThis helper maps non-`Decided` observations and receipt-digest mismatches to `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`, which turns internal consistency failures on the host WAL publication path into apparently lawful obstruction outcomes. If this path is ever hit (e.g., future refactor/regression), recovery evidence will look normal instead of surfacing a broken runtime/WAL invariant and aborting the publish attempt.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Make scheduler tick WAL writes failure-atomic**\n\nWhen `tick_once` records multiple new correlations from one `super_tick`, a failure on a later `record_tick_receipt` only restores `runtime`/`provenance` and returns, but any earlier tick WAL commits in the same loop remain durable. In a multi-head pass this can leave committed scheduler-tick evidence for state that was rolled back, so recovery can report decided/advanced receipt posture that never became visible in runtime.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.",317,"\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `13690936e8`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","@codex self-review findings for PR #379. Please confirm or challenge the severity/mitigation before we merge.\n\n| Severity | File / lines | Infraction | Evidence | Recommended mitigation prompt |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:277-285`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:534-536` | Scheduler tick WAL recording is not failure-atomic across a multi-head `super_tick`. | `tick_once` appends one scheduler-tick WAL transaction per new receipt correlation. If an earlier `record_tick_receipt(...)` succeeds and a later one fails, the code restores `runtime`/`provenance` but leaves the earlier WAL transaction and WAL frontier advances committed. `super_tick` can emit multiple records in one pass, so recovery may see tick evidence for a runtime state that was rolled back. | Add a regression with two independent heads in one `super_tick` and an injected failure on the second tick WAL record; assert `scheduler_tick_count() == 0` and recovered receipt/submission indexes contain no tick decision. Then make tick WAL recording atomic for the whole attempted scheduler pass: prebuild all tick transactions before append and restore/checkpoint `TrustedRuntimeWal` on failure, or introduce a batch append boundary whose failure cannot leave partial scheduler-tick evidence. |\n| P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:735-748` | Internal receipt-correlation inconsistency is converted into `WalTickDecision::Obstructed`. | `wal_tick_decision_from_observation(...)` returns `Obstructed` when `observe_intent_outcome(...)` is not `Decided` or when the observed receipt digest does not match the correlation being recorded. Those are internal consistency failures for this path, not lawful obstruction outcomes, and recording them as `Obstructed` makes recovery evidence look normal. | Change the helper to return `Result` and treat non-decided/mismatched correlation as a runtime/WAL invariant error that rolls back the attempted tick publication. Add regressions for missing observation and receipt-digest mismatch proving no scheduler-tick WAL transaction is committed. |\n| P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:404-412`, `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs:835-856` | Recovery certificate `recovered_indexes_root` does not bind recovered index contents. | `recover_read_only()` rebuilds `submissions` and `receipts`, but `runtime_wal_recovery_certificate(&report)` computes `recovered_indexes_root` only from transaction ids and commit digests. The certificate can therefore remain unchanged even if index reconstruction is wrong, incomplete, or later refactored incorrectly. | Compute the runtime WAL recovered index root from the rebuilt `RecoveredSubmissionIndex` and `RecoveredReceiptIndex` entries, not just the scan report. Add a test that proves the certificate root changes when recovered submission/receipt index content changes and that it includes posture, ticket, receipt, and envelope identity. |\n| P2 | `docs/BEARING.md:992-998`, `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md:127-133` | BEARING overclaims the cross-repo jedit fixture as complete. | Slice 94 is checked and its test plan says the sibling `jedit` fixture consumes generic Echo recovery JSON. This PR adds the Echo CLI posture surface and the release-gate doc says jedit *may* call it, but no sibling jedit fixture is included here. | Either uncheck/reword Slice 94 as “Echo recovery posture contract” and add a follow-on jedit fixture slice, or land the actual sibling jedit fixture before claiming the slice complete. Keep the PR description aligned with whichever truth is chosen. |\n\nLocal validation while reviewing:\n\n- `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n","**Actionable comments posted: 2**\n\n> [!CAUTION]\n> Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.\n> \n> \n> \n>

\n>

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

\n> \n>
\n>
docs/BEARING.md (1)
\n> \n> `6-6`: _⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n> \n> **Update stale document timestamp metadata.**\n> \n> Line 6 still says `Last updated: 2026-05-24.` even though this PR updates the file on May 25, 2026. Please bump it to the actual update date to keep roadmap metadata trustworthy.\n> \n> \n> \n> As per coding guidelines, documentation accuracy matters for determinism/recovery guarantees and related references.\n> \n>
\n>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
\n> \n> ```\n> Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\n> rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n> \n> In `@docs/BEARING.md` at line 6, Update the stale timestamp string \"Last updated:\n> 2026-05-24.\" in the BEARING.md document to the correct date \"Last updated:\n> 2026-05-25.\" so the document metadata matches this PR's update; locate the\n> literal \"Last updated: 2026-05-24.\" and replace it with the new date.\n> ```\n> \n>
\n> \n>
\n> \n>

\n\n

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

\n\n

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

\n\nFix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:\n\n- [ ] Push a commit to this branch (recommended)\n- [ ] Create a new PR with the fixes\n\n

\n\n---\n\n

ℹ️ Review info

\n\n

⚙️ Run configuration

\n\n**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n\n**Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n\n**Plan**: Pro\n\n**Run ID**: `484f6967-5f70-450a-a49a-ef19e05caeeb`\n\n

\n\n

📥 Commits

\n\nReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 363fd86739ba4a37ba19f5a25fdd7a98838085d7 and 13690936e85f8657c16353df017b03be1dfdd358.\n\n

\n\n

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

\n\n

\n\n","_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟠 Major_ | _🏗️ Heavy lift_\n\n**Partial WAL failure leaves committed records without runtime rollback.**\n\nIf `super_tick` produces multiple correlations and `record_tick_receipt` fails on the second or subsequent record, the first WAL record(s) remain committed while `runtime` and `provenance` are rolled back. On recovery, the WAL shows submissions decided but in-memory state doesn't reflect them.\n\nOptions:\n1. Batch all tick receipts into a single atomic WAL transaction.\n2. Track which WAL records were written and roll them back on partial failure (would require WAL support for uncommitting).\n3. Document that partial failure is unsupported and the in-memory adapter is only valid for single-correlation ticks.\n\nGiven this is the reference test adapter, option 3 may suffice for now, but production adapters should consider atomicity.\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` around lines 277 - 287, Partial\nWAL failure can leave some tick WAL records committed while runtime/provenance\nare rolled back; to avoid inconsistent state in this reference test adapter,\nenforce or document that multi-correlation ticks are unsupported when a WAL is\nin use: in the code path around runtime_wal and tick_wal_records (check the\nblock using self.runtime_wal.as_mut(), runtime_wal.record_tick_receipt,\ntick_wal_records, runtime_before, provenance_before and the super_tick caller),\neither (A) add a guard that returns an explicit error if tick_wal_records\ncontains more than one entry when self.runtime_wal.is_some(), or (B) add a clear\ninline comment and documentation stating that only single-correlation ticks are\nsupported with this adapter and that production adapters must provide atomic WAL\nsemantics; pick (A) for safety in tests or (B) if you prefer a\ndocumentation-only change.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commit 1f596c8",320,"_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_ | _⚡ Quick win_\n\n**Include canonical envelope digest in text output.**\n\nLine [91] omits `canonical_envelope_digest` in text mode, so the reported posture is ambiguous for the queried `(submission_id, envelope)` pair.\n\n \n\n

Proposed patch

\n\n\n\n

📝 Committable suggestion

\n\n\n\n

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

\n\n```\nVerify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the\nrest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `@crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` around lines 90 - 98, The formatted text assigned\nto the variable `text` in `wal.rs` is missing the `canonical_envelope_digest`,\nso update the format string and its argument list to include that field (e.g.,\nadd a \"Canonical envelope: {}\" line) and pass\n`output.canonical_envelope_digest.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"None\")` alongside the\nother `output.*` arguments to ensure the canonical envelope digest is printed in\ntext mode.\n```\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n✅ Addressed in commits 0893903 to add115d","crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs",99,"**_{_{![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)}} Roll back WAL appends when a later tick WAL write fails**\n\nIf one `super_tick` pass produces multiple new receipt correlations, this loop can append some scheduler-tick WAL transactions before a later append fails; on failure it restores only `runtime` and `provenance`, so earlier WAL commits from the same pass remain durable. That leaves recovery indexes showing decided receipts that were rolled back from live runtime state, violating the commit-before-publish atomicity this change is trying to enforce (e.g., partial success followed by `LsnOverflow` or store error on a later correlation).\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Review limit reached\n> \n> `@flyingrobots`, we couldn't start this review because you've used your available PR reviews for now.\n> \n> Your plan includes 1 review of capacity. Refill in 43 minutes and 27 seconds.\n> \n> Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml\n> \n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `c4c694b7-5a04-4fb6-81ea-679492adf5ab`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f596c8f1238fcb987288b9b02efd6c024b4bc01 and add115d089de856a2499c4824fec393bc7dc7df2.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

\n> \n>

\n\n\n\n\n\n

📝 Walkthrough

\n\n\n\n\n

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

\n\n_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n

✨ Finishing Touches

\n\n

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

\n\n- [ ] Create PR with unit tests\n- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch `stack/runtime-wal-tick-receipts`\n\n

\n\n

❤️ Share

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","base_ref","head_ref","pull_request_info",[577],{"_482":45,"_45":578},"@codex Activity Summary for PR #379 review cleanup\n\n| Source | Severity | File | Issue | Resolution | Commit | Verification |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Codex/CodeRabbit | P1 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | Scheduler tick WAL writes could leave partial tick evidence from a failed multi-head pass. | Runtime WAL is snapshotted and restored on any tick WAL publication failure; multi-head regression covers rollback of every tick record. | `1f596c8` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n| CodeRabbit | P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | `NoMatchingReceiptEntry` was persisted as lawful `Obstructed` evidence. | Added a RED/GREEN regression and now returns `TrustedRuntimeWalError::TickOutcomeUnavailable` so the pass rolls back. | `0893903` | `cargo test -p warp-core --features native_rule_bootstrap,trusted_runtime,host_test --lib trusted_runtime_host::tests::runtime_wal_tick_decision` |\n| Codex | P2 | `crates/warp-core/src/trusted_runtime_host.rs` | Recovery certificate index root was not bound to rebuilt index contents. | Recovery certificate root now uses `recovered_submission_receipt_index_root(...)` over rebuilt submission and receipt indexes. | `1f596c8` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n| CodeRabbit | P3 | `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` | Text output omitted the canonical envelope digest for the inspected submission/envelope pair. | Added `Canonical envelope` to text output and a CLI integration regression. | `a3c2ef7` | `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_text_reports_canonical_envelope_digest` |\n| CodeRabbit | P3 | `docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` | Recovery posture docs omitted `RecoveryFaulted`. | Documented `RecoveryFaulted` and named `crates/warp-cli/src/wal.rs` as the authoritative label source for this fixture. | `add115d` | `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md` |\n| Self/CodeRabbit | P4 | `docs/BEARING.md` | Top-level signpost timestamp was stale. | Updated `Last updated` to 2026-05-25. | `add115d` | `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/BEARING.md` |\n| CodeRabbit | P4 | `CHANGELOG.md` | Changelog guarantees were questioned before all regressions landed. | No downgrade needed after fixes: the multi-head rollback, invariant-error classification, and recovered-index-root witnesses are now green. | `1f596c8`, `0893903` | `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack` |\n\nValidation run after fixes:\n\n- `cargo xtask test-slice runtime-wal-ack`\n- `cargo test -p warp-cli --test cli_integration wal_submission_posture_text_reports_canonical_envelope_digest`\n- `cargo test -p xtask runtime_wal_ack`\n- `pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/BEARING.md docs/workflows.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-release-gate.md`\n- `git diff --check`\n- pre-push exact Rust slices for `warp-cli` and `warp-core`\n",[685,686],[],{"_487":488,"_45":489,"_490":491},{"_461":676},{"_332":675},{"_332":614},{"_300":301,"_292":302,"_303":304,"_305":15,"_306":57,"_307":15,"_308":309,"_310":311,"_312":264,"_313":125,"_314":315,"_316":127,"_317":318,"_319":-5,"_320":-5,"_321":613,"_323":324,"_325":326,"_327":328,"_329":330},{"_41":121,"_191":192,"_193":194,"_195":15,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":602,"_202":-5,"_203":-5,"_204":603,"_206":207,"_208":207,"_209":604,"_211":605,"_213":606,"_215":-5,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_220":221,"_222":607,"_53":-5,"_117":224,"_225":608,"_227":609,"_229":230,"_231":15,"_232":15},{"_131":595},[589,590,591,592,593,594],{"_146":169,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":170,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":168,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":165,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":166,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":167,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":162,"_148":163,"_150":164,"_152":161,"_154":165,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":160,"_148":149,"_150":151,"_152":161,"_154":155,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},{"_146":147,"_148":149,"_150":151,"_152":153,"_154":155,"_156":157,"_158":31,"_159":-5},[596,597,598],{"_175":601,"_177":188},{"_175":600,"_177":184},{"_175":599,"_177":178},{"_179":180,"_90":181,"_117":182},{"_179":185,"_90":181,"_117":186},{"_179":189,"_90":181,"_117":190},{"_294":295,"_296":-5,"_297":-5,"_298":-5,"_299":-5},[254],{"_254":610},{"_236":237,"_238":239,"_240":241,"_242":243,"_244":245,"_246":247,"_248":249,"_250":251,"_252":253},{},[],{"_235":57},{"_233":57,"_234":207},{"_41":256,"_179":257,"_258":611,"_260":194,"_261":262,"_263":264,"_265":266,"_267":268,"_269":270,"_271":62,"_272":15,"_273":-5,"_274":-5,"_275":-5,"_276":-5,"_277":-5,"_278":-5,"_158":279,"_280":-5,"_53":612},{"_286":287,"_41":288,"_90":289,"_290":291,"_292":293},{"_282":15,"_283":15,"_284":15,"_285":15},{"_286":287,"_179":287,"_331":-5,"_290":291,"_41":288},[615,616,617,618,619,620,621,622,623,624,625,626,627],{"_152":437,"_348":671},{"_152":363,"_348":668},{"_152":427,"_348":665},{"_152":367,"_348":660},{"_152":367,"_348":655},{"_152":367,"_348":651},{"_152":381,"_348":646},{"_152":381,"_348":642},{"_152":367,"_348":639},{"_152":381,"_348":637},{"_152":367,"_348":633},{"_152":363,"_348":631},{"_152":347,"_348":628},{"_350":351,"_85":629},{"_353":354,"_355":356,"_101":-5,"_41":357,"_358":630,"_360":361,"_362":111},[],{"_362":632,"_350":351},{"_90":366},{"_369":634,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":635,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":376,"_94":91,"_90":377},[636],{"_45":379,"_90":380},{"_369":638,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_41":384,"_375":376,"_45":379,"_90":385},{"_369":640,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":-5,"_388":389,"_41":-5,"_390":641,"_90":392},[],{"_369":643,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":644,"_41":396,"_390":645,"_90":392},[],[],{"_369":647,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":648,"_41":401,"_90":402},[649],{"_45":404,"_405":650,"_90":45},[],{"_369":652,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":653,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":321,"_90":377},[654],{"_45":404,"_90":411},{"_369":656,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":657,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":321,"_90":377},[658,659],{"_45":418,"_90":411},{"_45":417,"_90":411},{"_369":661,"_350":351,"_371":357},{"_372":662,"_374":-5,"_41":-5,"_375":-5,"_94":422,"_90":377},[663,664],{"_45":426,"_90":411},{"_45":425,"_90":411},{"_350":351,"_85":666},{"_101":-5,"_41":357,"_358":667,"_360":361,"_362":431},[],{"_362":669,"_350":351},{"_434":670,"_90":436},[],{"_439":672},{"_441":-5,"_442":-5,"_443":444,"_445":361,"_446":447,"_448":15,"_449":-5,"_450":-5,"_41":351,"_451":452,"_179":-5,"_159":453,"_454":207,"_455":456,"_362":673,"_75":674,"_459":361},{"_90":366},[],[],[677],{"_41":464,"_465":678,"_467":468,"_469":468,"_372":679,"_362":471,"_374":-5,"_472":31,"_473":680,"_475":476,"_477":-5},{"_94":321,"_179":-5,"_473":684},{"_482":45,"_483":683},{"_478":681},{"_480":682},[],[485],{},{"_90":377,"_94":91,"_372":688},{"_90":494,"_495":687},[],[689],{"_482":45,"_45":379},[692,693,694,695,696,697,698,699,700,701,702,703,704,705,706,707,708,709,710],{"_508":509,"_260":194,"_510":301,"_271":-5,"_511":254,"_512":-5,"_513":514,"_515":516,"_517":-5,"_518":-5,"_519":520,"_521":15,"_522":57,"_523":52,"_524":15},{"_90":377,"_94":321,"_372":711},{"_308":309,"_310":311,"_573":315,"_574":127,"_317":-5,"_90":575},{"_90":544,"_310":572,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":571,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":562},{"_90":544,"_310":563,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":568,"_159":569,"_546":550,"_547":570},{"_90":544,"_310":566,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":567},{"_90":544,"_310":565,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":564,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":563,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":561,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":562},{"_90":544,"_310":560,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":559,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":558,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":557,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":554,"_159":555,"_546":550,"_547":556},{"_90":544,"_310":551,"_159":552,"_546":550,"_547":553},{"_90":544,"_310":548,"_159":549,"_546":550,"_547":-5},{"_90":544,"_310":545,"_159":-5,"_546":-5,"_547":-5},[712],{"_482":45,"_45":578},"task_e_6a1487c3845c832a8f2336b154e5d023",1779730371.517624,"Github Mention: feat(core): commit runtime WAL ACK evidence","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_744":31,"_745":746,"_747":-5,"_748":-5,"_739":749,"_750":-5,"_751":-5,"_752":-5,"_753":-5},"task_status_display",{"_732":733,"_734":194,"_128":125,"_735":-5,"_736":737},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[725],{"_41":726,"_727":81,"_728":729,"_730":127},"github-1082070703-379","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_300":301,"_292":302,"_303":304,"_305":15,"_306":57,"_307":15,"_308":309,"_310":311,"_312":264,"_313":125,"_314":315,"_316":127,"_317":318,"_319":-5,"_320":-5,"_321":731,"_323":324,"_325":326,"_327":328,"_329":330},"codex_updated_sha",{"_286":287,"_179":287,"_331":-5,"_290":291,"_41":288},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_738":81,"_110":111,"_739":-5,"_92":740,"_741":-5,"_742":-5,"_743":737,"_112":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","pr","turn_id","diff_stats",[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_754":-5,"_755":-5,"_756":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","files_modified","lines_added","lines_removed","dd",{"_768":769,"_770":771},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",767],"traceId","8010765977225727346","traceTime",1780661332360]