\\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\\n> \\n> After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\\n> \\n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n> \\n>

\\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\\n> \\n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\\n> \\n> Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.\\n> \\n> Please see our [Fair Usage Limits Policy](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/management/plans#fair-usage-limits-policy) for further information.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\\n> \\n> **Configuration used**: Organization UI\\n> \\n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\\n> \\n> **Plan**: Pro\\n> \\n> **Run ID**: `115a00b9-02f0-47dc-8e3f-60e3670d28af`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📥 Commits

\\n> \\n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce1509a63d775ad0b0df215a3f69b0e2ead86335 and 0380c4375dcc315b583b1a2db259a018985db7ad.\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (28)

\\n> \\n> * `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md`\\n> * `README.md`\\n> * `ROADMAP.md`\\n> * `docs/README.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/README.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/agent-contracts.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/artifact-inventory.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/bootstrap-command.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/content-on-node.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/extensions-runtime.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/living-map-updates.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/packaging-adoption.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/provenance-confidence.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/relationship-inference.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/repo-fixture-builder.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/review-refinement.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/trust-observers.md`\\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md`\\n> * `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`\\n> * `docs/design/graph-data-model.md`\\n> * `docs/design/h1-semantic-bootstrap.md`\\n> * `test/design-docs.test.js`\\n> \\n>

\\n> \\n>

\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/git-mind&utm_content=323)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\\n\\n

\\n

❤️ Share

\\n\\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\\n\\n

\\n\\n\\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\\n\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"@codex Self-Code Review findings for PR #323.\\n\\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\\n| CL-001 | P2 High | `docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md:96`, `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:251-255` | Contract ambiguity | Query Receipts requires “receipt edge IDs,” but the current graph contract identifies edges by `(source, target, type)` tuple and the new graph data model does not introduce a stable edge ID. This will either make the test plan unimplementable or force a later implementation to invent ad hoc receipt IDs outside the model. | Update the graph data model and Query Receipts profile to define receipt identity explicitly. Either use `(source, target, type)` as the canonical assertion key everywhere, or introduce a deliberate `edgeId`/assertion-id contract with schema/test implications. Then replace “receipt edge IDs” wording and update Mermaid/examples accordingly. |\\n| CL-002 | P2 High | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:200-207`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md:65-67`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md:63-66` | Model contradiction | The canonical model repeatedly reifies edge assertions as ordinary Mermaid nodes (`Edge assertion`, `EdgeA`, `Edge`) even though the documented graph vocabulary has no canonical `edge:`/assertion node type. This directly undercuts the document’s rule that features must not invent a second graph vocabulary. | Remove pseudo-edge nodes from graph examples or add an explicit assertion identity model. Rewrite examples so receipts cite canonical tuple keys/properties, not unlabeled synthetic nodes, unless the PR intentionally adds a canonical assertion-node prefix and explains how it coexists with current WARP edges. |\\n| CL-003 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:135`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:210-217` | Edge semantics misuse | `documents` is defined as “explainer -> subject,” but the examples use `decision:` nodes as `documents` sources for an assertion/spec. A review decision is not a documentation artifact under this model; this teaches the wrong edge direction/type in the canonical model doc. | Rewrite review-decision diagrams to use `references` from `decision:` to the affected source/target/spec and document decision metadata as node properties. Reserve `documents` for `doc:`/`adr:`/`spec:` style explainer artifacts unless the model explicitly broadens the edge semantics. |\\n| CL-004 | P3 Medium | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:138-150`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:87-97`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:26-29`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:96-101` | Schema/model mismatch | `commit:` and `epoch:` are reserved system-generated prefixes in the schema, but the new graph data model lists them as normal artifact nodes and the Entity Extraction profile says bootstrap produces `commit:` nodes. Without a stated writer boundary, implementers can easily build import/manual flows that conflict with reserved-prefix rules. | Add a “system-owned nodes” subsection to the graph data model. State that `commit:`/`epoch:` may only be created by Git Mind system writers, not YAML/frontmatter/manual import, and update Entity Extraction tests to assert both allowed bootstrap/system creation and import rejection. |\\n| CL-005 | P4 Low | `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:76-83`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md:62-68` | Diagram style / graph vocabulary | The new `Graph Data Model Usage` sections include unlabeled Mermaid arrows (`-->`) even though the model says edges are directed typed assertions. In graph-model sections, unlabeled arrows read as untyped graph edges and weaken the canonical edge vocabulary. | Replace unlabeled arrows in graph-model examples with canonical edge labels (`references`, `documents`, `groups`, etc.) or explicitly caption those diagrams as pre-graph extraction mappings rather than graph data model examples. |\\n| CL-006 | P4 Low | `ROADMAP.md:127-136`; `gh issue view 312` reports issue `#312` closed on 2026-03-27 and `#320` closed on 2026-06-01 | Planning accuracy | The current Hill 1 deliverables still list the git-warp audit/upgrade cycle as future/current work even though the upgrade path has already landed and the related issues are closed. For a roadmap updated by this PR, this is stale planning state. | Update the roadmap to separate completed enabling work from remaining Hill 1 deliverables. Mark the git-warp audit/upgrade as completed, reference #312/#320 as closed evidence, and leave only active bootstrap work in the current deliverables list. |\\n| CL-007 | P5 Nit | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:9`, `docs/README.md:16`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:106`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:137-138`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:143` | Markdown style | New lines exceed 120 characters, and several are table rows in a new canonical document. This is not currently enforced by repo CI, but the branch is creating long-lived design docs and the style debt is avoidable. | Wrap the added prose lines and consider replacing the widest graph-model tables with definition lists or narrower tables so canonical docs stay readable in terminal review. |\\n\\nSummary: 7 issues found (P2: 2, P3: 2, P4: 2, P5: 1). No P0/P1 runtime blockers found; the branch is docs-only, but the graph model should be corrected before it becomes the implementation contract.\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**Summary**\\n* Clarified the graph assertion contract so receipts, diagnostics, import/export, and tests use the canonical `(source, target, type)` tuple rather than opaque receipt edge IDs or synthetic assertion nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL160-L178](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L160-L178) [GRAPH_SCHEMA.mdL259-L265](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/GRAPH_SCHEMA.md#L259-L265)\\n* Reworked query receipt and review-decision examples to cite real graph nodes/edges, use `references` for review decisions, and explicitly ban synthetic receipt-edge nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL227-L250](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L227-L250) [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL264-L276](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L264-L276) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL71-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L71-L85)\\n* Updated Query Receipts and Import/Export profile test/usage language to preserve assertion keys through receipts and interchange. [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL96-L100](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L96-L100) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL129-L133](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L129-L133) [docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.mdL58-L69](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md#L58-L69)\\n* Added explicit system-owned `commit:`/`epoch:` writer boundaries and updated Entity Extraction acceptance expectations to reject user-authored system-owned nodes in import/frontmatter/manual flows. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL96-L105](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L96-L105) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL96-L106](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L96-L106)\\n* Cleaned graph-model diagrams and semantics in Doctor, Entity Extraction, Views/Lenses, and the canonical model so graph examples use typed edges or are captioned as pre-graph mappings. [docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.mdL56-L70](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md#L56-L70) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL70-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L70-L85) [docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.mdL56-L68](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md#L56-L68)\\n* Refreshed Hill 1 roadmap planning state to separate completed git-warp audit/upgrade work from remaining bootstrap deliverables, citing #312 closed on 2026-03-27 and #320 closed on 2026-06-01. [ROADMAP.mdL127-L151](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/ROADMAP.md#L127-L151)\\n* Wrapped touched docs/navigation prose for terminal readability and marked the git-warp upgrade audit as completed enabling work in the docs map. [docs/README.mdL1-L20](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/README.md#L1-L20)\\n\\n**Commit / PR**\\n* Committed changes on branch `fix/pr-323-graph-contract-review` with commit `48696499f04846f1d9e87aa5804ee4171056f5e6`.\\n* Created PR record: **“Address PR #323 graph contract review findings”**.\\n\\n**Testing**\\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\\n* ✅ `npm run lint`\\n* ✅ `node --input-type=module` local docs link audit / review wording checks\\n* ⚠️ `npm test` failed in this environment with widespread `Git command failed with code 128` failures and one Vitest hook timeout; the change set is docs-only and did not modify runtime code.\\n\\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a1d102f03748191bd758d0bd603f748)\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"@codex Code Lawyer re-audit findings for PR #323.\\n\\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\\n| CL-008 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:3-5`, `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:52-70` | Planning accuracy / stale contract | This PR updates `ROADMAP.md` and `docs/README.md` to treat issues #312/#320 as completed enabling work, but the linked audit document still says the v17 continuation is active and describes git-warp 17 as the next upgrade. That makes the canonical docs disagree about whether the dependency modernization is done or pending. | Update the git-warp upgrade audit document to mark the v17 continuation completed, record the installed substrate versions, keep the historical v14 context explicitly historical, and add a regression check so docs cannot simultaneously call the audit completed and active. |\\n| CL-009 | P4 Low | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:311-314`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md:63-66`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md:68` | Graph-model example drift | The graph model now correctly says `commit:` and `epoch:` are system-owned, but some examples still use abstract IDs such as `epoch:before`, `epoch:after`, and `commit:graph-patch`. That weakens the writer-boundary rule and teaches implementers to invent system-owned IDs manually. | Replace abstract system-owned example IDs with concrete SHA/ref-shaped examples or non-system feature/task nodes where appropriate. Add a docs regression check that rejects abstract `commit:`/`epoch:` examples in the canonical graph model and feature profiles. |\\n\\nSummary: 2 new issues found in this re-audit (P3: 1, P4: 1). No unresolved GitHub review threads were present; these are self-discovered issues from `origin/main...HEAD` plus linked canonical-doc consistency checks.\\n\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"\\n### 💡 Codex Review\\n\\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\\n\\n**Reviewed commit:** `9b5006c387`\\n \\n\\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\\n
\\n\\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\\n- Open a pull request for review\\n- Mark a draft as ready\\n- Comment \\\"@codex review\\\".\\n\\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \\\"@codex address that feedback\\\".\\n \\n

\",\"path\":null,\"side\":null,\"line\":null}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Keep the completed audit link from contradicting the audit**\\n\\nThis newly labels the git-warp upgrade audit as completed, but the linked canonical audit still says `Status: active execution` and describes the v17 continuation as work that is still running/needed, even though the manifests now show `@git-stunts/git-warp` and `@git-stunts/plumbing` installed at 17.0.0/3.0.3. In the docs flow I inspected (`docs/README.md` -> `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`, also referenced by `ROADMAP.md`), this makes the official map disagree about whether issues #312/#320 are done or pending, so contributors can follow stale upgrade instructions instead of the current substrate contract.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"docs/README.md\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":19}{\"type\":\"pull_request_comment\",\"body\":\"**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Avoid abstract IDs for system-owned graph nodes**\\n\\nThe new model says `commit:` and `epoch:` nodes are reserved for system writers and should represent discovered commits/temporal markers, but this example teaches hand-authored placeholders like `epoch:before`/`epoch:after` (and `rg` shows the same drift in `time-travel-diff.md` plus `commit:graph-patch` in `graph-substrate.md`). For implementers reading the canonical graph model, these examples weaken the writer-boundary rule and can lead to import/frontmatter examples that invent system-owned IDs manually instead of using real ref/SHA-shaped values or non-system feature/task nodes.\\n\\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\",\"path\":\"docs/design/graph-data-model.md\",\"side\":\"RIGHT\",\"line\":null}","text_elements",[],{"_480":976,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":977,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":324,"_92":489},[978],{"_46":972,"_92":979},"input_text",{"_480":981,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":982,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":324,"_92":489},[983,984],{"_46":986,"_92":979},{"_46":985,"_92":979},"\n /workspace/git-mind\n bash\n 2026-06-01\n Etc/UTC\n","# AGENTS.md instructions for /workspace/git-mind\n\n\n# OPERATIONAL ORDERS FOR Codex\n\n## CROSS-REFERENCE\n\n- Code standards and contribution workflow: [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md)\n- Documentation map and canonical docs: [docs/README.md](docs/README.md)\n- Product frame: [docs/design/git-mind.md](docs/design/git-mind.md)\n- Planning governance: [docs/adr/ADR-0005.md](docs/adr/ADR-0005.md)\n- Delivery governance: [docs/adr/ADR-0006.md](docs/adr/ADR-0006.md)\n- Repo fixture strategy: [docs/design/repo-fixture-strategy.md](docs/design/repo-fixture-strategy.md)\n- CLI/user reference: [GUIDE.md](GUIDE.md)\n\n## FORBIDDEN ACTIONS\n\n- **NEVER** circumvent git hooks\n- **NEVER** use `git add -A` — always stage changes intentionally\n- **NEVER** commit files that contain secrets (.env, credentials, etc.)\n- **NEVER** commit directly to `main` — always work on a feature branch and merge via PR\n\n## ENCOURAGED ACTIONS\n\n- **USE SEQUENTIAL THINKING** if you're planning, doing recon, or find yourself thrashing\n- **DROP A DEVLOG** as often as you'd like\n- **PRESENT A SITREP** as situations evolve\n- **SEEK CLARITY** if you are given confusing orders\n- **SPEAK FREELY** at all times\n\n## REQUIRED BEHAVIOR\n\n- **YOU MUST** use IBM Design Thinking when framing substantial product work\n- **YOU MUST** identify the sponsor user, job to be done, and relevant Hill(s) when planning\n- **YOU MUST** use Playbacks to judge whether work actually moved a Hill\n- **YOU MUST** treat tests as the executable form of design acceptance criteria for substantial work\n- **YOU MUST** prefer canonical repo fixtures over ad hoc temp-repo setup when testing repository-shaped behavior\n- **YOU MUST** tag all memories saved to your memory banks with at least `#git-mind`\n- **YOU MUST** include the POSIX timestamp (via `$(date +%s)`) in memory file names\n- **YOU MUST** document significant decisions or events\n- **YOU MUST** reference a GitHub issue in every commit message\n\n---\n\n## 1. BOOT UP SEQUENCE\n\n1. Access your memory banks and scan for recent activity (latest SITREP or relevant notes)\n2. Read the README\n3. State your current understanding of what we last worked on and your next moves\n4. **AWAIT ORDERS** after you deliver your initial SITREP\n\n---\n\n## 2. JOBS\n\n> All work should have a GitHub issue associated with it. If there isn't one, find or create one. Every commit message must reference an issue.\n\n### 2.1. PLAN THE JOB\n\n1. Before starting, use sequential thinking to make a plan\n2. Frame the plan in IBM Design Thinking terms:\n - sponsor user\n - job to be done\n - relevant Hill(s) or supporting lane\n - playback evidence\n3. Explain your plan to the user and await approval\n4. Commit your approved plan to your memory banks\n5. **Create a feature branch** — `git checkout -b feat/` — before writing any code\n\n### 2.2. DO THE JOB\n\n1. Green the builds, green the tests\n2. Translate design acceptance criteria into failing tests before implementation when behavior is changing substantially\n3. Prefer shared repo fixtures (base repos + overlays) where repository history or artifact shape matters\n4. Drop micro-commits as you complete steps — always use conventional commit format\n5. Drop a SITREP if you hit a snag or need input\n6. Drop a DEVLOG for ideas, observations, or anything you want to remember\n7. Use your memory banks freely\n\n> **ALWAYS** overwrite files, **NEVER** create secondary copies — that creates confusion and tech debt.\n\n### 2.3. FINISH THE JOB\n\n1. Green the builds, green the tests\n2. Run a playback / retrospective and capture backlog items or COOL IDEAS explicitly\n3. Update `README.md` if shipped reality changed\n4. Git commit (do NOT use `git add -A`)\n5. Ask the user if they want you to push and open a PR\n6. Drop a SITREP as you finish\n\n---\n\n## 3. SITREPs\n\nA briefing covering:\n- Current tasks and situation understanding\n- Relevant stats, files, issues, PRs\n- Intel the user can use to make decisions\n- Sponsor user / Hill / playback framing when relevant\n- Options and recommendations, then await orders\n\n## 4. DEVLOGs\n\nYour space. Write about whatever you want:\n- Ideas that came up while working\n- Problems you notice\n- Insights about collaboration\n- Anything you want to remember later\n\n---\n\n## 5. TECH STACK REFERENCE\n\n- **Runtime**: Node.js >= 22, ES modules\n- **Core dependency**: `@git-stunts/git-warp` (published package, CRDT graph on Git)\n- **Plumbing**: `@git-stunts/plumbing` (must be installed as direct dependency)\n- **Tests**: vitest\n- **Style**: Plain JS with JSDoc, no TypeScript\n- **CLI**: Manual argv parsing, no CLI frameworks\n- **Formatting**: chalk + figures for terminal output\n\n",{"_480":988,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":989,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":990,"_92":489},[991,992],"developer",{"_46":994,"_92":979},{"_46":993,"_92":979},"\n## Skills\nA skill is a set of local instructions to follow that is stored in a `SKILL.md` file. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and file path so you can open the source for full instructions when using a specific skill.\n### Available skills\n- imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)\n- openai-docs: Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools, use bundled references only as helper context, and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)\n- plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional plugin folders/files, and baseline placeholders you can edit before publishing or testing. Use when Codex needs to create a new local plugin, add optional plugin structure, or generate or update repo-root `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` entries for plugin ordering and availability metadata. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/plugin-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-creator: Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/SKILL.md)\n- skill-installer: Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos). (file: /opt/codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/SKILL.md)\n### How to use skills\n- Discovery: The list above is the skills available in this session (name + description + file path). Skill bodies live on disk at the listed paths.\n- Trigger rules: If the user names a skill (with `$SkillName` or plain text) OR the task clearly matches a skill's description shown above, you must use that skill for that turn. Multiple mentions mean use them all. Do not carry skills across turns unless re-mentioned.\n- Missing/blocked: If a named skill isn't in the list or the path can't be read, say so briefly and continue with the best fallback.\n- How to use a skill (progressive disclosure):\n 1) After deciding to use a skill, open its `SKILL.md`. Read only enough to follow the workflow.\n 2) When `SKILL.md` references relative paths (e.g., `scripts/foo.py`), resolve them relative to the skill directory listed above first, and only consider other paths if needed.\n 3) If `SKILL.md` points to extra folders such as `references/`, load only the specific files needed for the request; don't bulk-load everything.\n 4) If `scripts/` exist, prefer running or patching them instead of retyping large code blocks.\n 5) If `assets/` or templates exist, reuse them instead of recreating from scratch.\n- Coordination and sequencing:\n - If multiple skills apply, choose the minimal set that covers the request and state the order you'll use them.\n - Announce which skill(s) you're using and why (one short line). If you skip an obvious skill, say why.\n- Context hygiene:\n - Keep context small: summarize long sections instead of pasting them; only load extra files when needed.\n - Avoid deep reference-chasing: prefer opening only files directly linked from `SKILL.md` unless you're blocked.\n - When variants exist (frameworks, providers, domains), pick only the relevant reference file(s) and note that choice.\n- Safety and fallback: If a skill can't be applied cleanly (missing files, unclear instructions), state the issue, pick the next-best approach, and continue.\n","\nFilesystem sandboxing defines which files can be read or written. `sandbox_mode` is `danger-full-access`: No filesystem sandboxing - all commands are permitted. Network access is enabled.\nApproval policy is currently never. Do not provide the `sandbox_permissions` for any reason, commands will be rejected.\n","turn/started",{"_461":462,"_87":997},{"_103":-5,"_42":468,"_469":998,"_471":472,"_473":999},[],"inProgress",{"_473":1001,"_461":462},{"_1002":1003,"_92":1004},"activeFlags",[],"active","thread/started",{"_1007":1008},"thread",{"_1009":-5,"_1010":-5,"_1011":1012,"_1013":472,"_524":525,"_1014":15,"_1015":-5,"_1016":-5,"_42":462,"_1017":1018,"_181":-5,"_1019":-5,"_161":1020,"_1021":210,"_1022":-5,"_529":1023,"_473":1024,"_1025":-5,"_77":1026,"_1027":472},"agentNickname","agentRole","cliVersion","0.124.0","createdAt","ephemeral","forkedFromId","gitInfo","modelProvider","openai","parentThreadId","/opt/codex/sessions/2026/06/01/rollout-2026-06-01T05-26-38-019e81a5-f921-7470-acc5-05c917b1400d.jsonl","preview","recencyAt","vscode",{"_92":477},"threadSource",[],"updatedAt",[],"messages",[1031],{"_42":1032,"_1033":1034,"_1035":1036,"_1037":1036,"_483":1038,"_473":1039,"_485":-5,"_1040":32,"_1041":1042,"_1043":1044,"_1045":-5},"2e1afe4f-889f-427f-b2ab-7d2733e83c5e","author",{"_96":324,"_181":-5,"_1041":1054},"create_time",1780291597.946094,"update_time",{"_1050":46,"_1051":1052},"finished_successfully","weight","metadata",{"_1046":1047},"recipient","all","channel","l1239dk1",{"_1048":1049},"inline_comments",[],"content_type","parts",[1053],"@codex Activity Summary for PR #323 Code Lawyer re-audit.\n\n| ID | Severity | Source | File | Commit | Outcome |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-008 | P3 Medium | Self | `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`, `test/design-docs.test.js` | `71f8601` | Added a docs-integrity regression and updated the git-warp upgrade audit to record the completed #320/#321 v17 outcome and installed substrate versions. |\n| CL-009 | P4 Low | Self | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md`, `test/design-docs.test.js` | `0380c43` | Added a docs-integrity regression rejecting abstract `commit:`/`epoch:` IDs in graph examples and replaced the offending examples with SHA-shaped system IDs. |\n\nVerification:\n\n| Check | Result |\n|---|---|\n| `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD` | Pass |\n| `npm run lint` | Pass |\n| `npm test` | Pass: 33 files, 602 tests |\n| Docs link/feature-profile/graph anti-pattern audit | Pass: 27 docs, 19 feature profiles |\n| Mermaid render audit | Pass: 25 blocks |\n| `npm run test:upgrade-fixture` | Pass: isolated Docker fixture, 128 nodes, 227 edges |\n\nUnresolved GitHub review threads: 0.\nAdd feature profiles and graph data model\n\n# PR Title\n\nAdd feature profiles and graph data model\n\n## Summary\n\n- Adds a feature-profile documentation set for the Git Mind product surface.\n- Defines the canonical product graph data model: node prefixes, edge directions, assertion properties, confidence bands, and core graph patterns.\n- Adds `Graph Data Model Usage` sections with Mermaid examples to every feature profile.\n- Updates canonical navigation in README, ROADMAP, docs index, H1 semantic bootstrap spec, and GRAPH_SCHEMA cross-reference.\n\n## Problem Statement\n\nGit Mind has a mature graph substrate but needs sharper product-facing specifications before the next implementation wave. This PR turns the current product direction into reviewable design artifacts with explicit IBM Design Thinking framing, playback evidence, graph vocabulary, and test expectations.\n\n## ADR Compliance (Required)\n\n### Relevant ADR(s)\n\n- [ ] ADR-0002 (Worktree Independence and Materialization Architecture)\n- [ ] ADR-0003 (Graph-Native Content, Deterministic Materialization, and Workspace Bridge)\n- [x] None\n\n### Compliance Declaration\n\n- [x] This PR is fully compliant with all checked ADRs.\n- [ ] This PR intentionally deviates from one or more checked ADRs (complete Exception Request below).\n\n### Exception Request (Required if deviating)\n\n- **ADR clause(s) deviated from:** None.\n- **Why deviation is necessary now:** No deviation.\n- **Risk introduced by deviation:** None.\n- **Mitigation and rollback plan:** Revert this docs-only PR if needed.\n- **Follow-up ADR/issue to reconcile architecture debt:** None.\n\n---\n\n## Architecture Laws Checklist (Hard Gates)\n\n### Canonical Truth & Context\n\n- [x] Graph remains canonical truth (no dual truth with generated files).\n- [x] No hidden worktree coupling introduced in core/domain/materialization paths.\n- [x] Context-sensitive behavior is explicit (`--at`, `--observer`, `--trust`) or deterministically defaulted.\n- [x] Resolved context is surfaced in output metadata where applicable.\n\n### Determinism & Provenance\n\n- [x] Pure query/materialization paths remain deterministic for identical inputs.\n- [x] Mutations/materializations include provenance receipts/envelopes where required.\n- [ ] Cache keys (if used) are derived only from semantic inputs + pinned versions.\n\n### Artifact Hygiene\n\n- [x] No forbidden generated artifact paths are tracked.\n- [ ] Any generated artifacts intentionally tracked are in allowlisted publish paths only.\n- [x] Pre-commit/CI policy checks updated or confirmed valid.\n\n### Contracts & Compatibility\n\n- [x] Machine-facing outputs are schema-versioned.\n- [ ] Breaking contract changes include version bump + migration notes.\n- [ ] Backward compatibility impact is documented below.\n\n### Extension/Effects Safety (if applicable)\n\n- [ ] Extension behavior does not bypass capability restrictions.\n- [ ] Effectful operations use explicit plan/apply semantics and emit receipts.\n- [ ] Timeouts/resource bounds are defined for new script/effect paths.\n\n---\n\n## Scope Control\n\n- [x] PR is single-purpose/cohesive (no unrelated refactors).\n- [x] Any non-essential refactor is split into separate PR(s) or explicitly justified.\n\n## Backward Compatibility\n\n- **CLI/API contract changes:** None.\n- **Data model/storage changes:** None. The new graph data model is design guidance only; runtime validators are unchanged.\n- **Migration required?:** No.\n- **User-facing behavior changes:** Documentation only; no runtime behavior changes.\n\n## Test Plan (Required)\n\n### Unit\n\n- [ ] Added/updated tests for changed logic\n- Commands:\n\n```bash\n# Not run; docs-only change with no runtime logic changes.\n```\n\n### Integration\n\n- [ ] Added/updated integration tests\n- [ ] Commands:\n\n```bash\n# Not run; docs-only change with no integration behavior changes.\n```\n\n### Determinism\n\n- [x] Determinism assertions included for relevant paths\n- [x] Method: one-off docs audit verifies links, feature-profile section structure, exactly one graph-model section per profile, and Mermaid presence.\n- [x] Commands:\n\n```bash\nnode --input-type=module <<'NODE'\n// Local docs audit over README.md, ROADMAP.md, GRAPH_SCHEMA.md,\n// docs/README.md, docs/design/graph-data-model.md,\n// docs/design/h1-semantic-bootstrap.md, and every feature profile.\n// Checks: local links exist, required feature-profile sections exist,\n// exactly one Graph Data Model Usage section per profile, and at least one\n// Mermaid block per profile.\nNODE\n```\n\n### Contract/Schema\n\n- [ ] Schema validation updated/passing\n- [x] Commands:\n\n```bash\n# Not applicable; no machine schema changed.\n```\n\n### Policy Gates\n\n- [x] Mechanical architecture gates pass\n- [x] Commands:\n\n```bash\ngit diff --check\nnpm run lint\nnode --input-type=module <<'NODE'\n// Rendered every Mermaid block in docs/design/graph-data-model.md and all\n// feature profiles through mmdc. Result: validated 24 Mermaid block(s).\nNODE\n```\n\n---\n\n## Security / Trust Impact\n\n- [x] Threat surface changed?: No.\n- [x] Trust policy impact: None.\n- [x] Provenance/audit impact: Documentation clarifies future graph assertion, provenance, confidence, review, and observer expectations; no runtime change.\n- [x] New failure modes introduced: None.\n\n### Performance Impact\n\n- [x] Hot path affected?: No.\n- [x] Expected impact (latency/memory/io): None.\n- [x] Benchmarks or profiling evidence: Not applicable for docs-only change.\n\n### Observability / Debuggability\n\n- [x] Errors are actionable and include context.\n- [x] Logs/diagnostics added or updated where needed.\n- [x] git mind status / diagnostics updated if writeback/eventing behavior changed.\n\n## Operational Notes\n\n- [x] Feature flag (if any): None.\n- [x] Rollback strategy: Revert the docs commits.\n- [x] Operational caveats: None.\n\n## Linked Issues / Milestones\n\n- [x] Closes #322\n- [x] Milestone: None\n\n---\n\n## Reviewer Quick Verdict Block (for maintainers)\n\n### MUST (Hard Gates)\n\n\t* PASS\n\n### SHOULD (Quality)\n\n\t* PASS\n\n### Verdict\n\n\t* APPROVE\n\n\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Review limit reached\n> \n> `@flyingrobots`, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.\n> \n> More reviews will be available in 29 minutes and 15 seconds. [Learn how PR review limits work](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/management/plans#fair-usage-limits-policy).\n> \n> Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.\n> \n> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.\n> \n>

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.\n> \n> Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.\n> \n> Please see our [Fair Usage Limits Policy](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/management/plans#fair-usage-limits-policy) for further information.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Organization UI\n> \n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `115a00b9-02f0-47dc-8e3f-60e3670d28af`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce1509a63d775ad0b0df215a3f69b0e2ead86335 and 0380c4375dcc315b583b1a2db259a018985db7ad.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (28)

\n> \n> * `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md`\n> * `README.md`\n> * `ROADMAP.md`\n> * `docs/README.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/README.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/agent-contracts.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/artifact-inventory.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/bootstrap-command.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/content-on-node.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/extensions-runtime.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/living-map-updates.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/packaging-adoption.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/provenance-confidence.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/relationship-inference.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/repo-fixture-builder.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/review-refinement.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/trust-observers.md`\n> * `docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md`\n> * `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`\n> * `docs/design/graph-data-model.md`\n> * `docs/design/h1-semantic-bootstrap.md`\n> * `test/design-docs.test.js`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n\n\n\n\n\n---\n\nThanks for using [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=flyingrobots/git-mind&utm_content=323)! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.\n\n

❤️ Share

\n\n- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)\n- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)\n- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)\n\n

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n\n@codex Self-Code Review findings for PR #323.\n\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-001 | P2 High | `docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md:96`, `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:251-255` | Contract ambiguity | Query Receipts requires “receipt edge IDs,” but the current graph contract identifies edges by `(source, target, type)` tuple and the new graph data model does not introduce a stable edge ID. This will either make the test plan unimplementable or force a later implementation to invent ad hoc receipt IDs outside the model. | Update the graph data model and Query Receipts profile to define receipt identity explicitly. Either use `(source, target, type)` as the canonical assertion key everywhere, or introduce a deliberate `edgeId`/assertion-id contract with schema/test implications. Then replace “receipt edge IDs” wording and update Mermaid/examples accordingly. |\n| CL-002 | P2 High | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:200-207`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md:65-67`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md:63-66` | Model contradiction | The canonical model repeatedly reifies edge assertions as ordinary Mermaid nodes (`Edge assertion`, `EdgeA`, `Edge`) even though the documented graph vocabulary has no canonical `edge:`/assertion node type. This directly undercuts the document’s rule that features must not invent a second graph vocabulary. | Remove pseudo-edge nodes from graph examples or add an explicit assertion identity model. Rewrite examples so receipts cite canonical tuple keys/properties, not unlabeled synthetic nodes, unless the PR intentionally adds a canonical assertion-node prefix and explains how it coexists with current WARP edges. |\n| CL-003 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:135`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:210-217` | Edge semantics misuse | `documents` is defined as “explainer -> subject,” but the examples use `decision:` nodes as `documents` sources for an assertion/spec. A review decision is not a documentation artifact under this model; this teaches the wrong edge direction/type in the canonical model doc. | Rewrite review-decision diagrams to use `references` from `decision:` to the affected source/target/spec and document decision metadata as node properties. Reserve `documents` for `doc:`/`adr:`/`spec:` style explainer artifacts unless the model explicitly broadens the edge semantics. |\n| CL-004 | P3 Medium | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:138-150`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:87-97`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:26-29`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:96-101` | Schema/model mismatch | `commit:` and `epoch:` are reserved system-generated prefixes in the schema, but the new graph data model lists them as normal artifact nodes and the Entity Extraction profile says bootstrap produces `commit:` nodes. Without a stated writer boundary, implementers can easily build import/manual flows that conflict with reserved-prefix rules. | Add a “system-owned nodes” subsection to the graph data model. State that `commit:`/`epoch:` may only be created by Git Mind system writers, not YAML/frontmatter/manual import, and update Entity Extraction tests to assert both allowed bootstrap/system creation and import rejection. |\n| CL-005 | P4 Low | `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:76-83`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md:62-68` | Diagram style / graph vocabulary | The new `Graph Data Model Usage` sections include unlabeled Mermaid arrows (`-->`) even though the model says edges are directed typed assertions. In graph-model sections, unlabeled arrows read as untyped graph edges and weaken the canonical edge vocabulary. | Replace unlabeled arrows in graph-model examples with canonical edge labels (`references`, `documents`, `groups`, etc.) or explicitly caption those diagrams as pre-graph extraction mappings rather than graph data model examples. |\n| CL-006 | P4 Low | `ROADMAP.md:127-136`; `gh issue view 312` reports issue `#312` closed on 2026-03-27 and `#320` closed on 2026-06-01 | Planning accuracy | The current Hill 1 deliverables still list the git-warp audit/upgrade cycle as future/current work even though the upgrade path has already landed and the related issues are closed. For a roadmap updated by this PR, this is stale planning state. | Update the roadmap to separate completed enabling work from remaining Hill 1 deliverables. Mark the git-warp audit/upgrade as completed, reference #312/#320 as closed evidence, and leave only active bootstrap work in the current deliverables list. |\n| CL-007 | P5 Nit | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:9`, `docs/README.md:16`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:106`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:137-138`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:143` | Markdown style | New lines exceed 120 characters, and several are table rows in a new canonical document. This is not currently enforced by repo CI, but the branch is creating long-lived design docs and the style debt is avoidable. | Wrap the added prose lines and consider replacing the widest graph-model tables with definition lists or narrower tables so canonical docs stay readable in terminal review. |\n\nSummary: 7 issues found (P2: 2, P3: 2, P4: 2, P5: 1). No P0/P1 runtime blockers found; the branch is docs-only, but the graph model should be corrected before it becomes the implementation contract.\n\n**Summary**\n* Clarified the graph assertion contract so receipts, diagnostics, import/export, and tests use the canonical `(source, target, type)` tuple rather than opaque receipt edge IDs or synthetic assertion nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL160-L178](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L160-L178) [GRAPH_SCHEMA.mdL259-L265](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/GRAPH_SCHEMA.md#L259-L265)\n* Reworked query receipt and review-decision examples to cite real graph nodes/edges, use `references` for review decisions, and explicitly ban synthetic receipt-edge nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL227-L250](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L227-L250) [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL264-L276](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L264-L276) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL71-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L71-L85)\n* Updated Query Receipts and Import/Export profile test/usage language to preserve assertion keys through receipts and interchange. [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL96-L100](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L96-L100) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL129-L133](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L129-L133) [docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.mdL58-L69](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md#L58-L69)\n* Added explicit system-owned `commit:`/`epoch:` writer boundaries and updated Entity Extraction acceptance expectations to reject user-authored system-owned nodes in import/frontmatter/manual flows. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL96-L105](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L96-L105) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL96-L106](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L96-L106)\n* Cleaned graph-model diagrams and semantics in Doctor, Entity Extraction, Views/Lenses, and the canonical model so graph examples use typed edges or are captioned as pre-graph mappings. [docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.mdL56-L70](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md#L56-L70) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL70-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L70-L85) [docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.mdL56-L68](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md#L56-L68)\n* Refreshed Hill 1 roadmap planning state to separate completed git-warp audit/upgrade work from remaining bootstrap deliverables, citing #312 closed on 2026-03-27 and #320 closed on 2026-06-01. [ROADMAP.mdL127-L151](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/ROADMAP.md#L127-L151)\n* Wrapped touched docs/navigation prose for terminal readability and marked the git-warp upgrade audit as completed enabling work in the docs map. [docs/README.mdL1-L20](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/README.md#L1-L20)\n\n**Commit / PR**\n* Committed changes on branch `fix/pr-323-graph-contract-review` with commit `48696499f04846f1d9e87aa5804ee4171056f5e6`.\n* Created PR record: **“Address PR #323 graph contract review findings”**.\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n* ✅ `npm run lint`\n* ✅ `node --input-type=module` local docs link audit / review wording checks\n* ⚠️ `npm test` failed in this environment with widespread `Git command failed with code 128` failures and one Vitest hook timeout; the change set is docs-only and did not modify runtime code.\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a1d102f03748191bd758d0bd603f748)\n@codex Code Lawyer re-audit findings for PR #323.\n\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-008 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:3-5`, `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:52-70` | Planning accuracy / stale contract | This PR updates `ROADMAP.md` and `docs/README.md` to treat issues #312/#320 as completed enabling work, but the linked audit document still says the v17 continuation is active and describes git-warp 17 as the next upgrade. That makes the canonical docs disagree about whether the dependency modernization is done or pending. | Update the git-warp upgrade audit document to mark the v17 continuation completed, record the installed substrate versions, keep the historical v14 context explicitly historical, and add a regression check so docs cannot simultaneously call the audit completed and active. |\n| CL-009 | P4 Low | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:311-314`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md:63-66`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md:68` | Graph-model example drift | The graph model now correctly says `commit:` and `epoch:` are system-owned, but some examples still use abstract IDs such as `epoch:before`, `epoch:after`, and `commit:graph-patch`. That weakens the writer-boundary rule and teaches implementers to invent system-owned IDs manually. | Replace abstract system-owned example IDs with concrete SHA/ref-shaped examples or non-system feature/task nodes where appropriate. Add a docs regression check that rejects abstract `commit:`/`epoch:` examples in the canonical graph model and feature profiles. |\n\nSummary: 2 new issues found in this re-audit (P3: 1, P4: 1). No unresolved GitHub review threads were present; these are self-discovered issues from `origin/main...HEAD` plus linked canonical-doc consistency checks.\n\n\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `9b5006c387`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n
\n\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\n- Open a pull request for review\n- Mark a draft as ready\n- Comment \"@codex review\".\n\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\n\n\n\n\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \"@codex address that feedback\".\n \n

\n**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Keep the completed audit link from contradicting the audit**\n\nThis newly labels the git-warp upgrade audit as completed, but the linked canonical audit still says `Status: active execution` and describes the v17 continuation as work that is still running/needed, even though the manifests now show `@git-stunts/git-warp` and `@git-stunts/plumbing` installed at 17.0.0/3.0.3. In the docs flow I inspected (`docs/README.md` -> `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`, also referenced by `ROADMAP.md`), this makes the official map disagree about whether issues #312/#320 are done or pending, so contributors can follow stale upgrade instructions instead of the current substrate contract.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.\n**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Avoid abstract IDs for system-owned graph nodes**\n\nThe new model says `commit:` and `epoch:` nodes are reserved for system writers and should represent discovered commits/temporal markers, but this example teaches hand-authored placeholders like `epoch:before`/`epoch:after` (and `rg` shows the same drift in `time-travel-diff.md` plus `commit:graph-patch` in `graph-substrate.md`). For implementers reading the canonical graph model, these examples weaken the writer-boundary rule and can lead to import/frontmatter examples that invent system-owned IDs manually instead of using real ref/SHA-shaped values or non-system feature/task nodes.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.",{},"created",1780291838.2066562,"Completing the task","event_type","info",{"_92":489,"_96":93,"_483":1511},{"_92":1062,"_1063":1064},"partial_repo_snapshot","files",[1065,1066,1067],{"_161":1369,"_1069":-5,"_1070":1370,"_1072":-5},{"_161":1113,"_1069":-5,"_1070":1114,"_1072":-5},{"_161":1068,"_1069":-5,"_1070":1071,"_1072":-5},"test/design-docs.test.js","contents","line_range_contents",[1073],"missing_reason",{"_1074":648,"_1075":1076,"_483":1077,"_1078":59},"line_range_start","line_range_end",44,[1079,1080,210,1081,210,1082,1083,1084,1085,210,1086,1087,1088,1089,1087,1090,1089,1091,1092,1089,1093,210,1094,1095,1096,1097,1098,1099,1100,1101,210,1102,1103,1104,1105,1106,1107,1108,1109,1110,210,1111,1093,1112],"contains_end_of_file","import { readdirSync, readFileSync } from 'node:fs';","import { join } from 'node:path';","import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';","describe('design docs integrity', () => {"," it('keeps the git-warp upgrade audit aligned with completed dependency reality', () => {"," const audit = readFileSync('docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md', 'utf8');"," const packageJson = JSON.parse(readFileSync('package.json', 'utf8'));"," expect(audit).toMatch(/^Status: completed\\./m);"," expect(audit).toContain("," `- \\`@git-stunts/git-warp\\`: \\`${packageJson.dependencies['@git-stunts/git-warp']}\\``,"," );"," `- \\`@git-stunts/plumbing\\`: \\`${packageJson.dependencies['@git-stunts/plumbing']}\\``,"," expect(audit).not.toMatch("," /active execution|is running on|modernization is now needed|the next substrate upgrade should/,"," });"," it('uses concrete system-owned commit and epoch IDs in graph-model examples', () => {"," const files = ["," 'docs/design/graph-data-model.md',"," ...readdirSync('docs/design/feature-profiles')"," .filter((name) => name.endsWith('.md'))"," .map((name) => join('docs/design/feature-profiles', name)),"," ];"," const abstractIds = [];"," for (const file of files) {"," const text = readFileSync(file, 'utf8');"," for (const match of text.matchAll(/\\b(commit|epoch):([A-Za-z0-9._/-]+)/g)) {"," const [, prefix, identifier] = match;"," if (!/^[0-9a-f]{7,40}$/.test(identifier)) {"," abstractIds.push(`${file}: ${prefix}:${identifier}`);"," }"," }"," }"," expect(abstractIds).toEqual([]);","});","docs/design/graph-data-model.md",[1115],{"_1074":648,"_1075":1116,"_483":1117,"_1078":59},344,[1118,210,1119,210,1120,210,1121,1122,1123,1124,210,1125,210,1126,210,1127,1128,1129,210,1130,210,1131,1132,210,1133,210,1134,1135,1136,210,1137,210,1138,1139,1140,210,1141,210,1142,1143,210,1144,210,1145,1146,1147,1148,1149,210,1150,1151,210,1152,210,1153,1154,210,1155,1156,1157,1158,1159,1160,1161,1162,1163,210,1164,1165,1166,210,1167,1168,1163,210,1169,210,1167,1170,1163,210,1171,210,1172,1173,210,1174,210,1175,1176,1177,1178,1179,1180,1181,1182,1183,1184,1185,1186,210,1187,210,1188,1189,1190,1191,1192,1193,1194,1195,1196,1197,1198,1199,1200,1201,1202,210,1203,210,1204,1205,1206,1207,1208,1206,1209,1210,1211,1212,1213,1214,1215,1216,1217,1218,1219,1217,210,1220,210,1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228,1229,1230,1231,1232,210,1233,210,1234,210,1235,1236,1237,1238,1239,1240,210,1241,1242,1243,1244,210,1245,210,1246,1247,210,1248,1249,1250,1251,1252,1253,1254,1255,1256,1257,1258,1259,1260,1261,1262,1263,1264,1265,1266,1267,1268,1269,1270,1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277,1278,1279,1280,210,1281,1282,1283,210,1284,210,1285,1286,210,1167,1287,1163,210,1288,210,1167,1289,1290,1163,210,1291,1292,1293,1294,1295,210,1296,210,1297,210,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302,1303,210,1304,210,1305,1306,1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,210,1312,1313,210,1314,210,1315,1316,1317,1318,1319,1320,210,1321,1322,210,1323,210,1324,210,1155,1156,1325,1326,1327,1328,1329,1163,210,1330,210,1155,1156,1331,1332,1333,1334,1335,1163,210,1336,210,1155,1156,1337,1338,1339,1340,1163,210,1341,210,1155,1156,1342,1343,1344,1345,1163,210,1346,210,1347,1348,1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355,1356,1357,210,1358,210,1359,210,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364,1365,1366,210,1367,1368],"# Git Mind Graph Data Model","Status: draft canonical product model for issue #322","Related:","- [Graph Schema Specification](../../GRAPH_SCHEMA.md)","- [Git Mind Product Frame](./git-mind.md)","- [Hill 1 Semantic Bootstrap Spec](./h1-semantic-bootstrap.md)","- [Feature Profiles](./feature-profiles/README.md)","## IBM Design Thinking Frame","Sponsor user:","- A technical lead, staff engineer, architect, or autonomous coding agent"," entering an unfamiliar repository and needing a trustworthy semantic map"," quickly.","Job to be done:","- When Git Mind records repository meaning, use a small, stable graph vocabulary"," that can answer real engineering questions with receipts.","Hills:","- Hill 1: Zero-input semantic bootstrap.","- Hill 2: Queryable answers with receipts.","- Hill 3: Living map with low manual upkeep.","Playback evidence:","- A reviewer can inspect a bootstrap graph and understand why each node exists,"," what each edge means, which edges are inferred, which edges are reviewed, and"," which evidence supports query answers.","## Relationship To `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md`","`GRAPH_SCHEMA.md` is the current executable import and validation contract.","This document is the product-level graph model that feature design should use.","The split is intentional:","- `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md` defines what the current runtime accepts.","- this document defines the canonical vocabulary Git Mind should use for repo"," intelligence.","- if this document proposes a convention not yet enforced by code, the follow-up"," implementation must add tests before treating it as shipped behavior.","No feature should silently invent a second graph vocabulary. If the vocabulary","here is wrong, update this document and the affected feature profile together.","## Model Summary","Git Mind stores repository meaning as directed assertions between canonical","nodes.","```mermaid","flowchart LR"," Artifact[\"Artifact nodes\"] -->|documents| Subject[\"Subject nodes\"]"," Work[\"Work nodes\"] -->|touches| Artifact"," Subject -->|depends-on| Dependency[\"Dependency nodes\"]"," Evidence[\"doc:evidence\"] -->|references| Artifact"," Reviewer[\"person:reviewer\"] -->|references| Decision[\"decision:review\"]"," Decision -->|references| Subject","```","The local Git repository is the graph scope. In v1, the local repository itself","does not need a regular `repo:` node. Cross-repo references use the existing","qualified ID form:","```text","repo:owner/name:prefix:identifier","Example:","repo:flyingrobots/echo:module:wal","## Canonical Nodes","Node IDs use the existing `prefix:identifier` grammar. Identifiers should be","stable, human-readable, and derived from repo artifacts whenever possible.","### Artifact Nodes","- `file:` identifies a repo file path."," Example: `file:src/graph.js`."," Typical properties: `path`, `language`, `artifactKind`, `hash`.","- `doc:` identifies a general documentation artifact."," Example: `doc:README`."," Typical properties: `path`, `title`, `heading`, `artifactKind`.","- `adr:` identifies an architecture decision record."," Example: `adr:0006`."," Typical properties: `path`, `title`, `status`, `date`.","- `spec:` identifies a product, API, schema, or behavior spec."," Example: `spec:bootstrap-json`."," Typical properties: `path`, `title`, `schemaVersion`.","### Subject Nodes","- `module:` identifies an internal module or subsystem."," Example: `module:bootstrap`."," Typical properties: `name`, `path`, `package`, `owner`.","- `crate:` identifies an internal package when the repo uses crate language."," Example: `crate:git-mind-core`."," Typical properties: `name`, `path`, `language`.","- `pkg:` identifies an external package or dependency."," Example: `pkg:@git-stunts/git-warp`."," Typical properties: `name`, `version`, `ecosystem`.","- `concept:` identifies a named idea that appears across artifacts."," Example: `concept:semantic-bootstrap`."," Typical properties: `name`, `aliases`.","- `decision:` identifies a review or architecture decision event."," Example: `decision:bootstrap-contract`."," Typical properties: `action`, `reviewer`, `timestamp`.","### Work Nodes","- `issue:` identifies a GitHub or tracker issue."," Example: `issue:322`."," Typical properties: `number`, `title`, `state`, `url`.","- `pr:` identifies a pull request."," Example: `pr:323`.","- `task:` identifies a local work item or actionable unit."," Example: `task:h1-bootstrap-tests`."," Typical properties: `title`, `status`, `owner`.","- `feature:` identifies a product feature grouping."," Example: `feature:query-receipts`."," Typical properties: `title`, `hill`, `status`.","- `milestone:` identifies a historical or release grouping."," Example: `milestone:h1`."," Typical properties: `title`, `status`.","- `phase:` identifies a phase alias used by legacy views."," Example: `phase:stabilize`.","### Actor And Tool Nodes","- `person:` identifies a human actor or reviewer."," Example: `person:james`."," Typical properties: `handle`, `displayName`.","- `tool:` identifies a tool, agent, service, or local integration."," Example: `tool:codex`."," Typical properties: `name`, `version`, `capabilities`.","- `event:` identifies a named event in repo history."," Example: `event:bootstrap-playback`."," Typical properties: `date`, `summary`.","- `metric:` identifies a measured value or health indicator."," Example: `metric:graph-density`."," Typical properties: `name`, `unit`, `value`.","### System-Owned Nodes","The schema reserves some prefixes for Git Mind system writers:","- `commit:` identifies a Git commit discovered through repository history."," Example: `commit:34636d3`."," Typical properties: `sha`, `author`, `date`, `summary`.","- `epoch:` identifies a system temporal marker for historical views."," Example: `epoch:34636d3`."," Typical properties: `ref`, `tick`, `createdAt`.","Users and import files must not author `commit:` or `epoch:` nodes directly.","Bootstrap and history-aware features may create them only through Git Mind's","system-owned writers, with tests that also prove YAML/frontmatter import still","rejects those prefixes where the schema requires rejection.","## Canonical Edges","Edges are directed. Direction matters because query receipts, views, and","review flows rely on it.","- `documents`: explainer -> subject."," Use when an artifact explains a subject."," Example: `doc:README -> module:cli`.","- `references`: source -> referenced."," Use for explicit citation, mention, or receipt evidence."," Example: `doc:README -> issue:322`.","- `implements`: implementation -> spec or feature."," Use when code or work realizes behavior."," Example: `file:src/bootstrap.js -> spec:bootstrap-json`.","- `touches`: change -> artifact."," Use when a commit, PR, or issue modifies or affects an artifact."," Example: `commit:34636d3 -> file:README.md`.","- `groups`: parent -> child."," Use for structural containment."," Example: `module:cli -> file:bin/git-mind.js`.","- `belongs-to`: member -> group."," Use for planning membership."," Example: `task:h1-bootstrap-tests -> feature:bootstrap`.","- `depends-on`: dependent -> dependency."," Use when one subject requires another first."," Example: `module:query -> module:graph`.","- `blocks`: blocker -> blocked."," Use when work cannot proceed until blocker changes."," Example: `issue:310 -> issue:304`.","- `consumed-by`: resource -> consumer."," Use when a dependency is consumed by a module."," Example: `pkg:@git-stunts/git-warp -> module:graph`.","- `augments`: extension -> base."," Use when one subject adds capability to another."," Example: `tool:extension -> module:git-mind`.","- `relates-to`: source -> related."," Use only for low-specificity associations."," Example: `concept:receipts -> concept:provenance`.","Use `relates-to` only when a stronger edge would be dishonest. If the evidence","can justify `documents`, `references`, `implements`, `groups`, or `touches`,","prefer the stronger type.","## Assertion Identity","Git Mind does not currently model edges as first-class `edge:` nodes. The","canonical identity for an assertion is the edge tuple:","(source, target, type)","Examples:","(file:src/bootstrap.js, spec:bootstrap-json, implements)","(doc:README, issue:322, references)","Query receipts, import/export contracts, diagnostics, and review decisions","should cite this tuple key unless a future schema version deliberately adds","first-class assertion IDs. Do not invent synthetic graph nodes such as","`edge:abc123` or `assertion:xyz` without updating this model, the validators,","and the affected feature profiles.","## Assertion Properties","The current runtime already uses these edge properties:","| Property | Required | Meaning |","|----------|----------|---------|","| `confidence` | yes | Finite number from `0.0` to `1.0` |","| `createdAt` | yes for local edge creation | ISO timestamp for creation |","| `rationale` | optional | Human-readable explanation |","| `reviewedAt` | optional | ISO timestamp for accepted or adjusted suggestion |","Feature work should converge on these additional conventions:","| Property | Meaning |","|----------|---------|","| `origin` | `manual`, `import`, `bootstrap`, `inference`, `review`, or `extension` |","| `detector` | Rule, parser, importer, or tool that produced the assertion |","| `evidence` | Stable paths, headings, line spans, commits, or URLs |","| `observer` | Trust or observer context used when the edge was read or written |","| `schemaVersion` | Machine contract version for structured edge metadata |","The exact shape of structured `evidence` should become a tested contract before","Hill 2 query receipts depend on it.","## Confidence Bands","| Band | Range | Product meaning |","|------|-------|-----------------|","| Verified | `1.0` | Human accepted or manually authored |","| High | `0.8` to `< 1.0` | Strong deterministic signal, not reviewed |","| Medium | `0.5` to `< 0.8` | Useful inference with visible evidence |","| Low | `0.0` to `< 0.5` | Review queue candidate |","Low-confidence edges should be useful enough to inspect, but they should not be","presented as settled facts.","## Core Patterns","### Bootstrap Map"," Readme[\"doc:README\"] -->|documents| Cli[\"module:cli\"]"," Adr[\"adr:0006\"] -->|documents| Bootstrap[\"feature:semantic-bootstrap\"]"," Cli -->|groups| Bin[\"file:bin/git-mind.js\"]"," Commit[\"commit:34636d3\"] -->|touches| Readme"," Readme -->|references| Issue[\"issue:322\"]","### Query Receipt"," Question[\"spec:query-question\"] -->|references| Target[\"module:bootstrap\"]"," Doc[\"doc:README\"] -->|documents| Target"," Answer[\"doc:answer-json\"] -->|references| Doc"," Answer -->|references| Target"," Reviewer[\"person:maintainer\"] -->|references| Answer","### Review Decision"," Suggestion[\"file:src/bootstrap.js\"] -->|implements| Contract[\"spec:bootstrap-json\"]"," Decision[\"decision:accept-bootstrap-edge\"] -->|references| Contract"," Decision -->|references| Suggestion"," Reviewer[\"person:reviewer\"] -->|references| Decision","### Living Map Update"," Old[\"epoch:34636d3\"] -->|references| Module[\"module:bootstrap\"]"," Change[\"commit:def4567\"] -->|touches| File[\"file:src/bootstrap.js\"]"," Module -->|groups| File"," New[\"epoch:def4567\"] -->|references| Module","## Model Rules","1. Prefer artifact-derived IDs over invented IDs.","2. Prefer specific edge types over `relates-to`.","3. Never claim an inferred edge without confidence and rationale.","4. Inferred edges need evidence that a user or agent can inspect.","5. Review decisions are graph facts, not out-of-band UI state.","6. Historical views must preserve the graph as it was at the selected ref or"," epoch.","7. Extension-provided nodes and edges must declare their origin and should stay"," inside the same vocabulary unless a profile explicitly extends it.","8. Unknown prefixes are allowed by the v1 schema, but product features should"," not rely on unknown prefixes without updating this document and validators.","## Test Implications","Every feature that writes or reads graph meaning should test:","- node ID stability for representative artifacts","- edge direction and type selection","- confidence band assignment","- provenance or evidence availability for inferred edges","- deterministic ordering in machine output","- round trip through export/import when the feature exposes a contract","- historical or observer-scoped behavior when relevant","The feature-profile test plans define the concrete fixtures and golden artifacts","for those checks.","docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md",[1371],{"_1074":648,"_1075":1372,"_483":1373,"_1078":59},203,[1374,210,1375,1376,1377,1378,210,1120,210,1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384,210,1385,210,1386,210,1387,210,1388,1389,210,1390,210,1391,210,1392,210,1393,210,1394,210,1395,210,1396,1397,210,1398,210,1399,210,1400,210,1401,210,1402,210,1403,1404,210,1405,210,1406,1407,210,1408,1409,210,1410,1411,210,1412,210,1413,1414,1415,1416,1417,1418,1419,210,1420,1421,1422,1423,210,1424,210,1425,210,1426,1427,1163,210,1428,210,1429,210,1430,210,1431,1432,1433,1434,210,1435,210,1436,210,1437,210,1438,210,1439,1440,1441,210,1442,210,1443,210,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,210,1454,210,1455,210,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,210,1463,210,1464,210,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,210,1471,210,1472,210,1473,210,1474,210,1475,1476,210,1477,210,1478,210,1479,1480,1481,1482,1483,210,1484,210,1485,1486,210,1487,1488,1489,1490,1491,1492,210,1493,210,1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501,1502,1503,210,1504,210,1505,210,1506,1507,1508,1509,1510],"# git-warp Upgrade Audit","Status: completed. The original 14.x audit ran on","`feat/git-warp-upgrade-audit`; the v17 continuation completed in issue","[#320](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/issues/320) and PR","[#321](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/pull/321).","- [ROADMAP.md](../../ROADMAP.md)","- [ADR-0005](../adr/ADR-0005.md)","- [ADR-0006](../adr/ADR-0006.md)","- [Repo Fixture Strategy](./repo-fixture-strategy.md)","- issue [#312](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/issues/312)","- issue [#320](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/issues/320)","## Purpose","Record the completed enabling cycle before major Hill 1 implementation:","> audit and upgrade Git Mind's `@git-stunts/git-warp` dependency so new Hill 1 work is not built on an outdated substrate by accident.","This was not a generic dependency bump.","It was a boundary audit plus upgrade cycle.","## Sponsor User","- A Git Mind maintainer extending the product who needs confidence that core graph, provenance, and time-travel behavior still behaves as Git Mind expects on a current git-warp version.","## Job To Be Done","- When I build new Git Mind behavior on top of git-warp, help me do it against a revalidated substrate with explicit compatibility evidence instead of stale assumptions.","## Context","Cycle starting state:","- declared in `package.json` as `^11.5.0`","- locked and installed at `11.5.0`","Live npm registry state checked on 2026-03-25:","- latest published `@git-stunts/git-warp` version: `14.16.2`","Chosen upgrade target for this cycle:","- `14.16.2`","That means this cycle upgrades Git Mind across three major versions of the substrate.","This does not automatically mean \"upgrade immediately no matter what.\"","It does mean Git Mind should not keep expanding Hill 1 behavior without auditing the real upgrade surface first.","## 2026-05-31 v17 Continuation","The original audit cycle moved Git Mind to the 14.x substrate. The follow-on","modernization moved Git Mind to:","- `@git-stunts/git-warp`: `17.0.0`","- `@git-stunts/plumbing`: `3.0.3`","`@git-stunts/git-warp@17.0.0` depends on `@git-stunts/plumbing@^3.0.3`, so the","upgrade moved those packages together.","The completed pass kept the upgrade sequence explicit:","1. freeze a sanitized Git-native fixture from the current v5 / git-warp 14 state","2. include only `HEAD` and the relevant `refs/warp/gitmind/*` graph refs","3. test that fixture in Docker without mounting this checkout into the container","4. pack the current Git Mind package and copy it into the Docker context","5. run graph/status/export assertions with a scrubbed home and Git config","6. upgrade to git-warp 17 / plumbing 3 and prove the migrated fixture still"," reads","This fixture is intentionally a Git bundle rather than a raw working-directory","archive. It preserves the exact Git object and WARP ref state under test while","excluding `node_modules`, local Git config, remotes, hooks, reflogs, stash state,","and host-specific paths.","Related issue: [#320](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/issues/320)","The local playback command for this safety rail remains:","```bash","npm run test:upgrade-fixture","## Why This Cycle Exists","The goal is explicitly **not** to build a lot of new behavior on top of git-warp right now.","The goal is:","- understand the dependency boundary Git Mind actually uses","- strengthen the tests around that boundary","- upgrade deliberately","- keep future Hill 1 work from inheriting avoidable substrate drift","## Observed Dependency Boundary","Based on current code inspection, Git Mind directly imports and depends on a relatively narrow but important git-warp surface.","### Direct Imports","From `@git-stunts/git-warp`, Git Mind currently imports:","- default export `WarpGraph`","- `GitGraphAdapter`","- `CONTENT_PROPERTY_KEY`","### Verified Graph Instance Methods Used In `src/`","Git Mind currently relies on these graph instance methods:","- `createPatch()`","- `hasNode()`","- `getNodeProps()`","- `getNodes()`","- `getEdges()`","- `getContentOid()`","- `getContent()`","- `materialize({ ceiling })`","- `observer(name, config)`","- `discoverTicks()`","### Verified Patch Methods Used In `src/`","Git Mind currently relies on these patch methods:","- `addNode()`","- `addEdge()`","- `removeEdge()`","- `setProperty()`","- `setEdgeProperty()`","- `attachContent()`","- `commit()`","### High-Risk Semantics","The upgrade should pay special attention to:","1. `WarpGraph.open(...)` and `GitGraphAdapter` initialization semantics","2. time-travel behavior of `materialize({ ceiling })`","3. observer/filter behavior via `graph.observer(...)`","4. content attachment and retrieval APIs","5. tick discovery / historical traversal assumptions","6. patch commit semantics and idempotency","## Known Mismatches Already Exposed","This cycle exposed one concrete runtime compatibility change:","- `graph.getNodeProps()` now returns plain objects rather than `Map` instances","Git Mind must treat node property bags as a compatibility boundary rather than assuming a single container shape.","This cycle also started with contributor-facing docs that still claimed git-warp","was installed via local path. Those docs were corrected as part of the upgrade.","## Acceptance Criteria","This cycle succeeded when:","1. Git Mind's actual git-warp dependency surface is documented and reviewed.","2. Compatibility-sensitive behaviors are protected by tests.","3. The upgrade target version is chosen deliberately, not by vibes.","4. Git Mind installs and tests cleanly against the chosen upgraded version.","5. Docs reflect the real dependency model afterward.","## Execution Model","Per [ADR-0006](../adr/ADR-0006.md), this cycle followed the normal","design-to-test flow:","1. finalize the upgrade-audit design artifact","2. translate the risky boundary into failing tests","3. use shared repo fixtures where repository-shaped behavior matters","4. upgrade and implement until tests are green","5. run a playback / retrospective","6. update README and contributor docs if reality changed","## Executed Work Sequence","1. Inventory git-warp touchpoints in `src/` and relevant tests.","2. Add or strengthen tests around:"," - graph open/init"," - node/edge mutation"," - content attachment"," - time-travel / epoch behavior"," - observer behavior if still relevant","3. Review upstream changes between `11.5.0`, `14.16.2`, and `17.0.0`.","4. Upgrade the dependency and lockfile on dedicated branches.","5. Fix breakage explicitly rather than papering over it.","## Playback Questions","Use these questions for the cycle retrospective:","1. Did we actually reduce substrate risk, or just move version numbers?","2. Are the important git-warp assumptions now executable as tests?","3. Did the upgrade simplify or complicate future Hill 1 work?","4. Did we discover any Git Mind behavior that was depending on accidental substrate quirks?","5. What follow-on work should be backlogged before deeper Hill 1 implementation resumes?",[1512,1513,1514,1515,1516,1517,1518,1519,1520],{"_1050":46,"_46":1534},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1369,"_1074":1533,"_1075":220},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1369,"_1074":1531,"_1075":1532},{"_1050":46,"_46":1530},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1113,"_1074":1528,"_1075":1529},{"_1050":46,"_46":1527},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1068,"_1074":1525,"_1075":1526},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1068,"_1074":1523,"_1075":1524},{"_1050":46,"_46":1521},"\n* No commit was created and no PR record was opened because the working tree was clean and there were no new changes to submit.\n\n**Testing**\n* ⚠️ `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD && npm run lint && npm test` failed immediately because this local checkout has no `origin/main` ref.\n* ⚠️ `git diff --check HEAD && npm run lint && npm test` passed diff-check and lint, then failed in `npm test` with existing widespread `Git command failed with code 128` failures plus one Vitest hook timeout.\n* ✅ `npx vitest run test/design-docs.test.js`","repo_file_citation",23,43,7,20,"\n* Confirmed the docs-integrity regression checks both audit completion/version alignment and abstract `commit:` / `epoch:` ID rejection. ",307,315,"\n* Confirmed the graph-model example now uses concrete SHA-shaped `epoch:` / `commit:` IDs instead of abstract placeholders. ",54,63,3,"**Summary**\n* No new code/doc changes were needed for this trigger. The branch already contains the CL-008/CL-009 fixes described in the activity summary.\n* Confirmed the git-warp audit now marks the v17 continuation as completed and records the installed substrate versions: `@git-stunts/git-warp` `17.0.0` and `@git-stunts/plumbing` `3.0.3`. ",{"_92":324,"_42":84,"_96":324,"_1537":1538,"_1539":1540,"_1541":1542,"_132":-5,"_119":1543},[83],"input_items",[1561,1562,1563,1564,1565,1566,1567,1568,1569],"external_post_config",{"_1544":1545,"_262":196,"_1546":304,"_273":-5,"_1547":257,"_1548":-5,"_1549":1550,"_1551":1552,"_1553":-5,"_1554":-5,"_1555":1556,"_1557":15,"_1558":59,"_1559":54,"_1560":15},"user_model_slug","slug",1780291591.344991,"installation_id",89912914,"pr_number","repo_id","review_trigger","comment_id",4589796886,"comment_type","issue","pr_write_guard_token","pending_pr_reaction_id","pending_comment_reaction_id",363911387,"comment_if_no_findings","comment_on_error","share_url","is_parallel_review",{"_92":489,"_96":324,"_483":1586},{"_311":312,"_313":314,"_1583":318,"_1584":129,"_320":-5,"_92":1585},{"_92":1570,"_313":1582,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1581,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1580,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1579,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1578,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1575,"_161":1576,"_1572":1573,"_1574":1577},{"_92":1570,"_313":1571,"_161":1113,"_1572":1573,"_1574":-5},"pull_request_comment","**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Avoid abstract IDs for system-owned graph nodes**\n\nThe new model says `commit:` and `epoch:` nodes are reserved for system writers and should represent discovered commits/temporal markers, but this example teaches hand-authored placeholders like `epoch:before`/`epoch:after` (and `rg` shows the same drift in `time-travel-diff.md` plus `commit:graph-patch` in `graph-substrate.md`). For implementers reading the canonical graph model, these examples weaken the writer-boundary rule and can lead to import/frontmatter examples that invent system-owned IDs manually instead of using real ref/SHA-shaped values or non-system feature/task nodes.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","side","RIGHT","line","**_{_{![P3 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P3-lightgrey?style=flat)}} Keep the completed audit link from contradicting the audit**\n\nThis newly labels the git-warp upgrade audit as completed, but the linked canonical audit still says `Status: active execution` and describes the v17 continuation as work that is still running/needed, even though the manifests now show `@git-stunts/git-warp` and `@git-stunts/plumbing` installed at 17.0.0/3.0.3. In the docs flow I inspected (`docs/README.md` -> `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`, also referenced by `ROADMAP.md`), this makes the official map disagree about whether issues #312/#320 are done or pending, so contributors can follow stale upgrade instructions instead of the current substrate contract.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","docs/README.md",19,"\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `9b5006c387`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","@codex Code Lawyer re-audit findings for PR #323.\n\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-008 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:3-5`, `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md:52-70` | Planning accuracy / stale contract | This PR updates `ROADMAP.md` and `docs/README.md` to treat issues #312/#320 as completed enabling work, but the linked audit document still says the v17 continuation is active and describes git-warp 17 as the next upgrade. That makes the canonical docs disagree about whether the dependency modernization is done or pending. | Update the git-warp upgrade audit document to mark the v17 continuation completed, record the installed substrate versions, keep the historical v14 context explicitly historical, and add a regression check so docs cannot simultaneously call the audit completed and active. |\n| CL-009 | P4 Low | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:311-314`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md:63-66`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md:68` | Graph-model example drift | The graph model now correctly says `commit:` and `epoch:` are system-owned, but some examples still use abstract IDs such as `epoch:before`, `epoch:after`, and `commit:graph-patch`. That weakens the writer-boundary rule and teaches implementers to invent system-owned IDs manually. | Replace abstract system-owned example IDs with concrete SHA/ref-shaped examples or non-system feature/task nodes where appropriate. Add a docs regression check that rejects abstract `commit:`/`epoch:` examples in the canonical graph model and feature profiles. |\n\nSummary: 2 new issues found in this re-audit (P3: 1, P4: 1). No unresolved GitHub review threads were present; these are self-discovered issues from `origin/main...HEAD` plus linked canonical-doc consistency checks.\n","**Summary**\n* Clarified the graph assertion contract so receipts, diagnostics, import/export, and tests use the canonical `(source, target, type)` tuple rather than opaque receipt edge IDs or synthetic assertion nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL160-L178](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L160-L178) [GRAPH_SCHEMA.mdL259-L265](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/GRAPH_SCHEMA.md#L259-L265)\n* Reworked query receipt and review-decision examples to cite real graph nodes/edges, use `references` for review decisions, and explicitly ban synthetic receipt-edge nodes. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL227-L250](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L227-L250) [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL264-L276](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L264-L276) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL71-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L71-L85)\n* Updated Query Receipts and Import/Export profile test/usage language to preserve assertion keys through receipts and interchange. [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL96-L100](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L96-L100) [docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.mdL129-L133](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md#L129-L133) [docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.mdL58-L69](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md#L58-L69)\n* Added explicit system-owned `commit:`/`epoch:` writer boundaries and updated Entity Extraction acceptance expectations to reject user-authored system-owned nodes in import/frontmatter/manual flows. [docs/design/graph-data-model.mdL96-L105](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/graph-data-model.md#L96-L105) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL96-L106](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L96-L106)\n* Cleaned graph-model diagrams and semantics in Doctor, Entity Extraction, Views/Lenses, and the canonical model so graph examples use typed edges or are captioned as pre-graph mappings. [docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.mdL56-L70](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md#L56-L70) [docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.mdL70-L85](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md#L70-L85) [docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.mdL56-L68](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md#L56-L68)\n* Refreshed Hill 1 roadmap planning state to separate completed git-warp audit/upgrade work from remaining bootstrap deliverables, citing #312 closed on 2026-03-27 and #320 closed on 2026-06-01. [ROADMAP.mdL127-L151](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/ROADMAP.md#L127-L151)\n* Wrapped touched docs/navigation prose for terminal readability and marked the git-warp upgrade audit as completed enabling work in the docs map. [docs/README.mdL1-L20](https://github.com/flyingrobots/git-mind/blob/c5cf9562e41668b8c46bb229ed55e1f9d3067e58/docs/README.md#L1-L20)\n\n**Commit / PR**\n* Committed changes on branch `fix/pr-323-graph-contract-review` with commit `48696499f04846f1d9e87aa5804ee4171056f5e6`.\n* Created PR record: **“Address PR #323 graph contract review findings”**.\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n* ✅ `npm run lint`\n* ✅ `node --input-type=module` local docs link audit / review wording checks\n* ⚠️ `npm test` failed in this environment with widespread `Git command failed with code 128` failures and one Vitest hook timeout; the change set is docs-only and did not modify runtime code.\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a1d102f03748191bd758d0bd603f748)","@codex Self-Code Review findings for PR #323.\n\n| ID | Severity | File:Line(s) | Type | Finding | Recommended agent prompt |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-001 | P2 High | `docs/design/feature-profiles/query-receipts.md:96`, `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:251-255` | Contract ambiguity | Query Receipts requires “receipt edge IDs,” but the current graph contract identifies edges by `(source, target, type)` tuple and the new graph data model does not introduce a stable edge ID. This will either make the test plan unimplementable or force a later implementation to invent ad hoc receipt IDs outside the model. | Update the graph data model and Query Receipts profile to define receipt identity explicitly. Either use `(source, target, type)` as the canonical assertion key everywhere, or introduce a deliberate `edgeId`/assertion-id contract with schema/test implications. Then replace “receipt edge IDs” wording and update Mermaid/examples accordingly. |\n| CL-002 | P2 High | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:200-207`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/import-export-interchange.md:65-67`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/doctor-integrity.md:63-66` | Model contradiction | The canonical model repeatedly reifies edge assertions as ordinary Mermaid nodes (`Edge assertion`, `EdgeA`, `Edge`) even though the documented graph vocabulary has no canonical `edge:`/assertion node type. This directly undercuts the document’s rule that features must not invent a second graph vocabulary. | Remove pseudo-edge nodes from graph examples or add an explicit assertion identity model. Rewrite examples so receipts cite canonical tuple keys/properties, not unlabeled synthetic nodes, unless the PR intentionally adds a canonical assertion-node prefix and explains how it coexists with current WARP edges. |\n| CL-003 | P3 Medium | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:135`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:63-65`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:210-217` | Edge semantics misuse | `documents` is defined as “explainer -> subject,” but the examples use `decision:` nodes as `documents` sources for an assertion/spec. A review decision is not a documentation artifact under this model; this teaches the wrong edge direction/type in the canonical model doc. | Rewrite review-decision diagrams to use `references` from `decision:` to the affected source/target/spec and document decision metadata as node properties. Reserve `documents` for `doc:`/`adr:`/`spec:` style explainer artifacts unless the model explicitly broadens the edge semantics. |\n| CL-004 | P3 Medium | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:138-150`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:87-97`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:26-29`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:96-101` | Schema/model mismatch | `commit:` and `epoch:` are reserved system-generated prefixes in the schema, but the new graph data model lists them as normal artifact nodes and the Entity Extraction profile says bootstrap produces `commit:` nodes. Without a stated writer boundary, implementers can easily build import/manual flows that conflict with reserved-prefix rules. | Add a “system-owned nodes” subsection to the graph data model. State that `commit:`/`epoch:` may only be created by Git Mind system writers, not YAML/frontmatter/manual import, and update Entity Extraction tests to assert both allowed bootstrap/system creation and import rejection. |\n| CL-005 | P4 Low | `docs/design/feature-profiles/entity-extraction.md:76-83`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/views-lenses.md:62-68` | Diagram style / graph vocabulary | The new `Graph Data Model Usage` sections include unlabeled Mermaid arrows (`-->`) even though the model says edges are directed typed assertions. In graph-model sections, unlabeled arrows read as untyped graph edges and weaken the canonical edge vocabulary. | Replace unlabeled arrows in graph-model examples with canonical edge labels (`references`, `documents`, `groups`, etc.) or explicitly caption those diagrams as pre-graph extraction mappings rather than graph data model examples. |\n| CL-006 | P4 Low | `ROADMAP.md:127-136`; `gh issue view 312` reports issue `#312` closed on 2026-03-27 and `#320` closed on 2026-06-01 | Planning accuracy | The current Hill 1 deliverables still list the git-warp audit/upgrade cycle as future/current work even though the upgrade path has already landed and the related issues are closed. For a roadmap updated by this PR, this is stale planning state. | Update the roadmap to separate completed enabling work from remaining Hill 1 deliverables. Mark the git-warp audit/upgrade as completed, reference #312/#320 as closed evidence, and leave only active bootstrap work in the current deliverables list. |\n| CL-007 | P5 Nit | `GRAPH_SCHEMA.md:9`, `docs/README.md:16`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:106`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:137-138`, `docs/design/graph-data-model.md:143` | Markdown style | New lines exceed 120 characters, and several are table rows in a new canonical document. This is not currently enforced by repo CI, but the branch is creating long-lived design docs and the style debt is avoidable. | Wrap the added prose lines and consider replacing the widest graph-model tables with definition lists or narrower tables so canonical docs stay readable in terminal review. |\n\nSummary: 7 issues found (P2: 2, P3: 2, P4: 2, P5: 1). No P0/P1 runtime blockers found; the branch is docs-only, but the graph model should be corrected before it becomes the implementation contract.\n","\n\n\n> [!WARNING]\n> ## Review limit reached\n> \n> `@flyingrobots`, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.\n> \n> More reviews will be available in 29 minutes and 15 seconds. [Learn how PR review limits work](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/management/plans#fair-usage-limits-policy).\n> \n> Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the [billing tab](https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/subscription?tab=usage&tenantId=4252c417-78a1-49cd-a607-68d1e6bdacc4).\n> \n>

\n>

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

\n> \n> \n>

\n>

🚦 How do rate limits work?

\n> \n>

\n>

ℹ️ Review info

\n> \n>

\n>

⚙️ Run configuration

\n> \n> **Configuration used**: Organization UI\n> \n> **Review profile**: ASSERTIVE\n> \n> **Plan**: Pro\n> \n> **Run ID**: `115a00b9-02f0-47dc-8e3f-60e3670d28af`\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📥 Commits

\n> \n> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce1509a63d775ad0b0df215a3f69b0e2ead86335 and 0380c4375dcc315b583b1a2db259a018985db7ad.\n> \n>

\n> \n>

\n>

📒 Files selected for processing (28)

\n> \n>

❤️ Share

\n\n\n_{Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}\n\n","base_ref","head_ref","pull_request_info",[1587],{"_1050":46,"_46":1588},"@codex Activity Summary for PR #323 Code Lawyer re-audit.\n\n| ID | Severity | Source | File | Commit | Outcome |\n|---|---:|---|---|---|---|\n| CL-008 | P3 Medium | Self | `docs/design/git-warp-upgrade-audit.md`, `test/design-docs.test.js` | `71f8601` | Added a docs-integrity regression and updated the git-warp upgrade audit to record the completed #320/#321 v17 outcome and installed substrate versions. |\n| CL-009 | P4 Low | Self | `docs/design/graph-data-model.md`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/time-travel-diff.md`, `docs/design/feature-profiles/graph-substrate.md`, `test/design-docs.test.js` | `0380c43` | Added a docs-integrity regression rejecting abstract `commit:`/`epoch:` IDs in graph examples and replaced the offending examples with SHA-shaped system IDs. |\n\nVerification:\n\n| Check | Result |\n|---|---|\n| `git diff --check origin/main...HEAD` | Pass |\n| `npm run lint` | Pass |\n| `npm test` | Pass: 33 files, 602 tests |\n| Docs link/feature-profile/graph anti-pattern audit | Pass: 27 docs, 19 feature profiles |\n| Mermaid render audit | Pass: 25 blocks |\n| `npm run test:upgrade-fixture` | Pass: isolated Docker fixture, 128 nodes, 227 edges |\n\nUnresolved GitHub review threads: 0.\n",[2078,2079],[],{"_1055":1056,"_46":1057,"_1058":1059},{"_1029":2069},{"_335":2068},{"_335":1624},{"_303":304,"_294":305,"_306":307,"_308":59,"_309":15,"_310":15,"_311":312,"_313":314,"_315":266,"_316":127,"_317":318,"_319":129,"_320":321,"_322":-5,"_323":-5,"_324":1623,"_326":327,"_328":329,"_330":331,"_332":333},{"_42":123,"_193":194,"_195":196,"_197":15,"_198":199,"_200":201,"_202":1612,"_204":-5,"_205":206,"_207":1613,"_209":210,"_211":210,"_212":1614,"_214":1615,"_216":1616,"_218":-5,"_219":220,"_221":222,"_223":224,"_225":1617,"_55":-5,"_119":227,"_228":1618,"_230":1619,"_232":233,"_234":15,"_235":15},{"_133":1605},[1599,1600,1601,1602,1603,1604],{"_148":171,"_150":165,"_152":166,"_154":163,"_156":172,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},{"_148":170,"_150":165,"_152":166,"_154":163,"_156":167,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},{"_148":168,"_150":165,"_152":166,"_154":163,"_156":169,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},{"_148":164,"_150":165,"_152":166,"_154":163,"_156":167,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},{"_148":162,"_150":151,"_152":153,"_154":163,"_156":157,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},{"_148":149,"_150":151,"_152":153,"_154":155,"_156":157,"_158":159,"_160":32,"_161":-5},[1606,1607,1608],{"_177":1611,"_179":190},{"_177":1610,"_179":186},{"_177":1609,"_179":180},{"_181":182,"_92":183,"_119":184},{"_181":187,"_92":183,"_119":188},{"_181":191,"_92":183,"_119":192},{"_296":297,"_298":-5,"_299":-5,"_300":-5,"_301":-5,"_302":-5},[257],{"_257":1620},{"_239":240,"_241":242,"_243":244,"_245":246,"_247":248,"_249":250,"_251":252,"_253":254,"_255":256},{},[],{"_238":59},{"_236":59,"_237":210},{"_42":259,"_181":199,"_260":1621,"_262":196,"_263":264,"_265":266,"_267":268,"_269":270,"_271":272,"_273":64,"_274":15,"_275":-5,"_276":-5,"_277":-5,"_278":-5,"_279":-5,"_280":-5,"_160":281,"_282":-5,"_55":1622},{"_288":289,"_42":290,"_92":291,"_292":293,"_294":295},{"_284":15,"_285":15,"_286":15,"_287":15},{"_288":289,"_181":289,"_334":-5,"_292":293,"_42":290},[1625,1626,1627,1628,1629,1630,1631,1632,1633,1634,1635,1636,1637,1638,1639,1640,1641,1642,1643,1644,1645,1646,1647,1648,1649,1650,1651,1652,1653,1654,1655,1656,1657,1658,1659,1660,1661,1662,1663,1664,1665,1666,1667,1668,1669,1670,1671,1672,1673,1674,1675,1676,1677,1678,1679,1680,1681,1682,1683,1684,1685,1686,1687,1688,1689,1690,1691,1692,1693,1694,1695,1696,1697,1698,1699,1700,1701,1702,1703,1704,1705,1706,1707,1708,1709,1710,1711,1712,1713,1714,1715,1716,1717,1718,1719,1720,1721,1722,1723,1724,1725,1726,1727,1728,1729,1730,1731,1732,1733,1734,1735,1736,1737,1738,1739,1740,1741,1742,1743,1744,1745],{"_154":1005,"_459":2064},{"_154":474,"_459":2061},{"_154":995,"_459":2058},{"_154":478,"_459":2053},{"_154":478,"_459":2048},{"_154":478,"_459":2044},{"_154":493,"_459":2039},{"_154":493,"_459":2035},{"_154":478,"_459":2032},{"_154":478,"_459":2030},{"_154":493,"_459":2026},{"_154":478,"_459":2024},{"_154":478,"_459":2022},{"_154":493,"_459":2018},{"_154":478,"_459":2016},{"_154":493,"_459":2012},{"_154":478,"_459":2009},{"_154":478,"_459":2007},{"_154":493,"_459":2001},{"_154":478,"_459":1999},{"_154":493,"_459":1995},{"_154":478,"_459":1992},{"_154":478,"_459":1990},{"_154":493,"_459":1986},{"_154":478,"_459":1984},{"_154":493,"_459":1980},{"_154":478,"_459":1977},{"_154":478,"_459":1975},{"_154":493,"_459":1971},{"_154":478,"_459":1969},{"_154":493,"_459":1965},{"_154":478,"_459":1962},{"_154":478,"_459":1960},{"_154":478,"_459":1958},{"_154":493,"_459":1954},{"_154":478,"_459":1951},{"_154":478,"_459":1949},{"_154":478,"_459":1947},{"_154":478,"_459":1945},{"_154":478,"_459":1943},{"_154":478,"_459":1941},{"_154":478,"_459":1939},{"_154":478,"_459":1937},{"_154":478,"_459":1935},{"_154":478,"_459":1933},{"_154":478,"_459":1931},{"_154":493,"_459":1927},{"_154":478,"_459":1924},{"_154":478,"_459":1922},{"_154":478,"_459":1920},{"_154":493,"_459":1916},{"_154":478,"_459":1913},{"_154":478,"_459":1911},{"_154":478,"_459":1909},{"_154":478,"_459":1907},{"_154":478,"_459":1905},{"_154":478,"_459":1903},{"_154":478,"_459":1901},{"_154":478,"_459":1899},{"_154":478,"_459":1897},{"_154":478,"_459":1895},{"_154":478,"_459":1893},{"_154":478,"_459":1891},{"_154":478,"_459":1889},{"_154":478,"_459":1887},{"_154":478,"_459":1885},{"_154":478,"_459":1883},{"_154":478,"_459":1881},{"_154":478,"_459":1879},{"_154":478,"_459":1877},{"_154":478,"_459":1875},{"_154":478,"_459":1873},{"_154":478,"_459":1871},{"_154":478,"_459":1869},{"_154":478,"_459":1867},{"_154":478,"_459":1865},{"_154":478,"_459":1863},{"_154":478,"_459":1861},{"_154":478,"_459":1859},{"_154":478,"_459":1857},{"_154":478,"_459":1855},{"_154":478,"_459":1853},{"_154":478,"_459":1851},{"_154":478,"_459":1849},{"_154":478,"_459":1847},{"_154":478,"_459":1845},{"_154":478,"_459":1843},{"_154":478,"_459":1841},{"_154":478,"_459":1839},{"_154":478,"_459":1837},{"_154":493,"_459":1833},{"_154":478,"_459":1831},{"_154":478,"_459":1829},{"_154":493,"_459":1825},{"_154":478,"_459":1822},{"_154":478,"_459":1820},{"_154":493,"_459":1816},{"_154":478,"_459":1814},{"_154":493,"_459":1810},{"_154":478,"_459":1807},{"_154":478,"_459":1805},{"_154":493,"_459":1800},{"_154":478,"_459":1798},{"_154":493,"_459":1794},{"_154":478,"_459":1791},{"_154":478,"_459":1789},{"_154":478,"_459":1787},{"_154":493,"_459":1783},{"_154":478,"_459":1781},{"_154":478,"_459":1779},{"_154":493,"_459":1775},{"_154":478,"_459":1772},{"_154":478,"_459":1770},{"_154":493,"_459":1766},{"_154":478,"_459":1764},{"_154":493,"_459":1760},{"_154":478,"_459":1757},{"_154":493,"_459":1755},{"_154":478,"_459":1751},{"_154":474,"_459":1749},{"_154":458,"_459":1746},{"_461":462,"_87":1747},{"_464":465,"_466":467,"_103":-5,"_42":468,"_469":1748,"_471":472,"_473":113},[],{"_473":1750,"_461":462},{"_92":477},{"_480":1752,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1753,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":488,"_96":93,"_92":489},[1754],{"_46":491,"_92":492},{"_480":1756,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_42":496,"_487":488,"_46":491,"_92":497},{"_480":1758,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1759,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1761,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1762,"_42":507,"_501":1763,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1765,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":512,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":514,"_92":515},{"_480":1767,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":519,"_520":521,"_522":1768,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":512,"_527":528,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[1769],{"_520":533,"_92":534},{"_480":1771,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":538,"_511":512,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1773,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1774,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1776,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1777,"_42":548,"_501":1778,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1780,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":552,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":553,"_92":515},{"_480":1782,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":556,"_511":552,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1784,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":560,"_520":561,"_522":1785,"_524":525,"_466":563,"_526":32,"_42":564,"_527":565,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[1786],{"_520":567,"_92":534},{"_480":1788,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":564,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":570,"_92":515},{"_480":1790,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":573,"_511":564,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1792,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1793,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1795,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1796,"_42":580,"_501":1797,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1799,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":584,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":585,"_92":515},{"_480":1801,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":588,"_520":589,"_522":1802,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":584,"_527":591,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[1803,1804],{"_520":598,"_181":599,"_161":600,"_92":597},{"_520":594,"_181":595,"_161":596,"_92":597},{"_480":1806,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":603,"_511":584,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1808,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1809,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1811,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1812,"_42":610,"_501":1813,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1815,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":614,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":615,"_92":515},{"_480":1817,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":618,"_520":619,"_522":1818,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":614,"_527":621,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[1819],{"_520":623,"_92":534},{"_480":1821,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":626,"_511":614,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1823,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1824,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1826,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1827,"_42":633,"_501":1828,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1830,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":637,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":638,"_92":515},{"_480":1832,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":641,"_511":637,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1834,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":644,"_520":645,"_522":1835,"_524":525,"_466":647,"_526":648,"_42":649,"_527":650,"_529":530,"_473":651,"_92":531},[1836],{"_520":653,"_92":534},{"_480":1838,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":656,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":657,"_92":515},{"_480":1840,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":641,"_511":656,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1842,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":662,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":663,"_92":515},{"_480":1844,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":641,"_511":662,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1846,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":668,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":669,"_92":515},{"_480":1848,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":672,"_511":668,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1850,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":675,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":676,"_92":515},{"_480":1852,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":679,"_511":675,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1854,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":682,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":683,"_92":515},{"_480":1856,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":679,"_511":682,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1858,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":688,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":689,"_92":515},{"_480":1860,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":679,"_511":688,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1862,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":694,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":695,"_92":515},{"_480":1864,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":679,"_511":694,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1866,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":700,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":701,"_92":515},{"_480":1868,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":679,"_511":700,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1870,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":706,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":707,"_92":515},{"_480":1872,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":706,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1874,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":713,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":714,"_92":515},{"_480":1876,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":713,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1878,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":719,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":720,"_92":515},{"_480":1880,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":719,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1882,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":725,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":726,"_92":515},{"_480":1884,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":725,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1886,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":731,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":732,"_92":515},{"_480":1888,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":731,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1890,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":737,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":738,"_92":515},{"_480":1892,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":710,"_511":737,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1894,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":743,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":744,"_92":515},{"_480":1896,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":747,"_511":743,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1898,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":750,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":751,"_92":515},{"_480":1900,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":747,"_511":750,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1902,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":756,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":757,"_92":515},{"_480":1904,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":760,"_511":756,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1906,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":763,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":764,"_92":515},{"_480":1908,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":760,"_511":763,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1910,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":769,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":770,"_92":515},{"_480":1912,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":760,"_511":769,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1914,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1915,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1917,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1918,"_42":779,"_501":1919,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1921,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":783,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":784,"_92":515},{"_480":1923,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":787,"_511":783,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1925,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1926,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1928,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1929,"_42":794,"_501":1930,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1932,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":798,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":799,"_92":515},{"_480":1934,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":787,"_511":798,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1936,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":804,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":805,"_92":515},{"_480":1938,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":808,"_511":804,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1940,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":811,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":812,"_92":515},{"_480":1942,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":808,"_511":811,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1944,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":817,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":818,"_92":515},{"_480":1946,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":808,"_511":817,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1948,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":823,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":824,"_92":515},{"_480":1950,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":808,"_511":823,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":557,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1952,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1953,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1955,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1956,"_42":833,"_501":1957,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1959,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":649,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":837,"_92":515},{"_480":1961,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":840,"_511":649,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1963,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1964,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1966,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1967,"_42":847,"_501":1968,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1970,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":851,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":852,"_92":515},{"_480":1972,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":855,"_520":856,"_522":1973,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":851,"_527":858,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[1974],{"_520":860,"_92":534},{"_480":1976,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":863,"_511":851,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1978,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1979,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1981,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1982,"_42":870,"_501":1983,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":1985,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":874,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":875,"_92":515},{"_480":1987,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":878,"_520":879,"_522":1988,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":881,"_42":874,"_527":882,"_529":530,"_473":651,"_92":531},[1989],{"_520":884,"_92":534},{"_480":1991,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":887,"_511":874,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":1993,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":1994,"_92":503},[],{"_480":1996,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":1997,"_42":894,"_501":1998,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":2000,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":898,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":899,"_92":515},{"_480":2002,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":902,"_520":903,"_522":2003,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":898,"_527":905,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[2004,2005,2006],{"_520":913,"_181":914,"_161":915,"_92":597},{"_520":910,"_181":911,"_161":912,"_92":597},{"_520":909,"_181":599,"_161":600,"_92":597},{"_480":2008,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":918,"_511":898,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":2010,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":2011,"_92":503},[],{"_480":2013,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":2014,"_42":925,"_501":2015,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":2017,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":929,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":930,"_92":515},{"_480":2019,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":933,"_520":934,"_522":2020,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":929,"_527":936,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[2021],{"_520":938,"_92":534},{"_480":2023,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":941,"_511":929,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":2025,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_511":944,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_513":945,"_92":515},{"_480":2027,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_518":948,"_520":949,"_522":2028,"_524":525,"_466":32,"_526":32,"_42":944,"_527":951,"_529":530,"_473":113,"_92":531},[2029],{"_520":953,"_92":534},{"_480":2031,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_537":956,"_511":944,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_181":539,"_540":-5,"_92":541},{"_480":2033,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":-5,"_500":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_501":2034,"_92":503},[],{"_480":2036,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":2037,"_42":963,"_501":2038,"_92":503},[],[],{"_480":2040,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_967":-5,"_483":2041,"_42":969,"_92":970},[2042],{"_46":972,"_973":2043,"_92":46},[],{"_480":2045,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":2046,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":324,"_92":489},[2047],{"_46":972,"_92":979},{"_480":2049,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":2050,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":324,"_92":489},[2051,2052],{"_46":986,"_92":979},{"_46":985,"_92":979},{"_480":2054,"_461":462,"_482":468},{"_483":2055,"_485":-5,"_42":-5,"_486":-5,"_487":-5,"_96":990,"_92":489},[2056,2057],{"_46":994,"_92":979},{"_46":993,"_92":979},{"_461":462,"_87":2059},{"_103":-5,"_42":468,"_469":2060,"_471":472,"_473":999},[],{"_473":2062,"_461":462},{"_1002":2063,"_92":1004},[],{"_1007":2065},{"_1009":-5,"_1010":-5,"_1011":1012,"_1013":472,"_524":525,"_1014":15,"_1015":-5,"_1016":-5,"_42":462,"_1017":1018,"_181":-5,"_1019":-5,"_161":1020,"_1021":210,"_1022":-5,"_529":1023,"_473":2066,"_1025":-5,"_77":2067,"_1027":472},{"_92":477},[],[],[2070],{"_42":1032,"_1033":2071,"_1035":1036,"_1037":1036,"_483":2072,"_473":1039,"_485":-5,"_1040":32,"_1041":2073,"_1043":1044,"_1045":-5},{"_96":324,"_181":-5,"_1041":2077},{"_1050":46,"_1051":2076},{"_1046":2074},{"_1048":2075},[],[1053],{},{"_92":489,"_96":93,"_483":2093},{"_92":1062,"_1063":2080},[2081,2082,2083],{"_161":1369,"_1069":-5,"_1070":2090,"_1072":-5},{"_161":1113,"_1069":-5,"_1070":2087,"_1072":-5},{"_161":1068,"_1069":-5,"_1070":2084,"_1072":-5},[2085],{"_1074":648,"_1075":1076,"_483":2086,"_1078":59},[1079,1080,210,1081,210,1082,1083,1084,1085,210,1086,1087,1088,1089,1087,1090,1089,1091,1092,1089,1093,210,1094,1095,1096,1097,1098,1099,1100,1101,210,1102,1103,1104,1105,1106,1107,1108,1109,1110,210,1111,1093,1112],[2088],{"_1074":648,"_1075":1116,"_483":2089,"_1078":59},[1118,210,1119,210,1120,210,1121,1122,1123,1124,210,1125,210,1126,210,1127,1128,1129,210,1130,210,1131,1132,210,1133,210,1134,1135,1136,210,1137,210,1138,1139,1140,210,1141,210,1142,1143,210,1144,210,1145,1146,1147,1148,1149,210,1150,1151,210,1152,210,1153,1154,210,1155,1156,1157,1158,1159,1160,1161,1162,1163,210,1164,1165,1166,210,1167,1168,1163,210,1169,210,1167,1170,1163,210,1171,210,1172,1173,210,1174,210,1175,1176,1177,1178,1179,1180,1181,1182,1183,1184,1185,1186,210,1187,210,1188,1189,1190,1191,1192,1193,1194,1195,1196,1197,1198,1199,1200,1201,1202,210,1203,210,1204,1205,1206,1207,1208,1206,1209,1210,1211,1212,1213,1214,1215,1216,1217,1218,1219,1217,210,1220,210,1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228,1229,1230,1231,1232,210,1233,210,1234,210,1235,1236,1237,1238,1239,1240,210,1241,1242,1243,1244,210,1245,210,1246,1247,210,1248,1249,1250,1251,1252,1253,1254,1255,1256,1257,1258,1259,1260,1261,1262,1263,1264,1265,1266,1267,1268,1269,1270,1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277,1278,1279,1280,210,1281,1282,1283,210,1284,210,1285,1286,210,1167,1287,1163,210,1288,210,1167,1289,1290,1163,210,1291,1292,1293,1294,1295,210,1296,210,1297,210,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302,1303,210,1304,210,1305,1306,1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,210,1312,1313,210,1314,210,1315,1316,1317,1318,1319,1320,210,1321,1322,210,1323,210,1324,210,1155,1156,1325,1326,1327,1328,1329,1163,210,1330,210,1155,1156,1331,1332,1333,1334,1335,1163,210,1336,210,1155,1156,1337,1338,1339,1340,1163,210,1341,210,1155,1156,1342,1343,1344,1345,1163,210,1346,210,1347,1348,1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355,1356,1357,210,1358,210,1359,210,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364,1365,1366,210,1367,1368],[2091],{"_1074":648,"_1075":1372,"_483":2092,"_1078":59},[1374,210,1375,1376,1377,1378,210,1120,210,1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384,210,1385,210,1386,210,1387,210,1388,1389,210,1390,210,1391,210,1392,210,1393,210,1394,210,1395,210,1396,1397,210,1398,210,1399,210,1400,210,1401,210,1402,210,1403,1404,210,1405,210,1406,1407,210,1408,1409,210,1410,1411,210,1412,210,1413,1414,1415,1416,1417,1418,1419,210,1420,1421,1422,1423,210,1424,210,1425,210,1426,1427,1163,210,1428,210,1429,210,1430,210,1431,1432,1433,1434,210,1435,210,1436,210,1437,210,1438,210,1439,1440,1441,210,1442,210,1443,210,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,210,1454,210,1455,210,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,210,1463,210,1464,210,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,210,1471,210,1472,210,1473,210,1474,210,1475,1476,210,1477,210,1478,210,1479,1480,1481,1482,1483,210,1484,210,1485,1486,210,1487,1488,1489,1490,1491,1492,210,1493,210,1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501,1502,1503,210,1504,210,1505,210,1506,1507,1508,1509,1510],[2094,2095,2096,2097,2098,2099,2100,2101,2102],{"_1050":46,"_46":1534},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1369,"_1074":1533,"_1075":220},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1369,"_1074":1531,"_1075":1532},{"_1050":46,"_46":1530},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1113,"_1074":1528,"_1075":1529},{"_1050":46,"_46":1527},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1068,"_1074":1525,"_1075":1526},{"_1050":1522,"_161":1068,"_1074":1523,"_1075":1524},{"_1050":46,"_46":1521},[2105,2106,2107,2108,2109,2110,2111,2112,2113],{"_1544":1545,"_262":196,"_1546":304,"_273":-5,"_1547":257,"_1548":-5,"_1549":1550,"_1551":1552,"_1553":-5,"_1554":-5,"_1555":1556,"_1557":15,"_1558":59,"_1559":54,"_1560":15},{"_92":489,"_96":324,"_483":2114},{"_311":312,"_313":314,"_1583":318,"_1584":129,"_320":-5,"_92":1585},{"_92":1570,"_313":1582,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1581,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1580,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1579,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1578,"_161":-5,"_1572":-5,"_1574":-5},{"_92":1570,"_313":1575,"_161":1576,"_1572":1573,"_1574":1577},{"_92":1570,"_313":1571,"_161":1113,"_1572":1573,"_1574":-5},[2115],{"_1050":46,"_46":1588},"task_e_6a1d18060410832a8f4f577b22bde854",1780291590.016238,"Github Mention: Add feature profiles and graph data model","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_2147":32,"_2148":2149,"_2150":-5,"_2151":-5,"_2142":2152,"_2153":-5,"_2154":-5,"_2155":-5,"_2156":-5},"task_status_display",{"_2135":2136,"_2137":196,"_130":127,"_2138":-5,"_2139":2140},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[2128],{"_42":2129,"_2130":83,"_2131":2132,"_2133":129},"github-1000622866-323","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_303":304,"_294":305,"_306":307,"_308":59,"_309":15,"_310":15,"_311":312,"_313":314,"_315":266,"_316":127,"_317":318,"_319":129,"_320":321,"_322":-5,"_323":-5,"_324":2134,"_326":327,"_328":329,"_330":331,"_332":333},"codex_updated_sha",{"_288":289,"_181":289,"_334":-5,"_292":293,"_42":290},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_2141":83,"_112":113,"_2142":-5,"_94":2143,"_2144":-5,"_2145":-5,"_2146":2140,"_114":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","pr","turn_id","diff_stats",[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_2157":-5,"_2158":-5,"_2159":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","files_modified","lines_added","lines_removed","dd",{"_2171":2172,"_2173":2174},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",2170],"traceId","2599108429931608612","traceTime",1783077304326]