ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n
\n\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\n- Open a pull request for review\n- Mark a draft as ready\n- Comment \"@codex review\".\n\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\n\n\n\n\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \"@codex address that feedback\".\n \n

","side","line","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} State consistently whether mirror downloads are excluded**\n\nFor the PyPI total, this caveat contradicts the heading on line 93 and the reproduction request's `mirrors=false`: readers are first told that mirrors were excluded, then that the reported download counts include mirror traffic. This affects how the 1,805-download baseline is interpreted in future trend comparisons; qualify the caveat by channel or state that the PyPI figure excludes the mirrors filtered by pypistats.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","RIGHT","### Summary\n* Pinned the version 1.0.0 adoption census citation to the immutable corrected revision, `f5cd355`, while retaining instructions for resolving future editions. [doc/adoption.mdL223-L236](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md#L223-L236)\n* Replaced the placeholder citation URL with the directly usable commit permalink in both the plain-text citation and BibTeX entry. [doc/adoption.mdL238-L258](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md#L238-L258)\n* Committed the change as `f56ce5b` (`docs: pin adoption census citation`) and prepared a follow-up PR titled **“docs: pin the adoption census citation to its corrected edition.”**\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n* ✅ `python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` (validated in-page anchors and repository-relative links)\n* ✅ `curl -fsSIL 'https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md' | head -n 1` (HTTP 200)\n* ✅ `git show --check --stat --oneline HEAD`\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a7d0d6794188191b525f6e01f7106ff)","Valid, and it was a wrong number rather than an imprecise label — fixed in 463d707.\n\n`open_issues_count` from the repository endpoint counts pull requests as issues, so the \"Open issues: 28\" row was the sum of two different things. Deriving the split from `/issues?state=open` and filtering entries carrying a `pull_request` key:\n\n| | at census time |\n|---|---|\n| Open issues | 21 |\n| Open pull requests | 8 (incl. this PR) |\n| `open_issues_count` field | 29 |\n\nThe row is now two rows with the pitfall stated inline, since a future maintainer refreshing this section is exactly who would step on it again. The reproduction snippet in §9 drops `open_issues_count` and shows the filtered query instead, with a note to paginate past 100 open items so the count cannot truncate silently.\n\nIncidentally this PR demonstrated the bug while it was being reported: the field read 28 when the census was taken and 29 once #323 was opened, with no issue having been filed.\n\nCensus version stays at 1.0.0 — the edition has not been published yet, so these are corrections to it rather than a new edition.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `f5cd355844`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Separate pull requests from the open-issue count**\n\nWhen the repository has open pull requests, this value is not the number of open issues: the reproduction command on lines 199–200 reads GitHub's `open_issues_count`, which includes both issues and pull requests. This makes the census signal and future trend comparisons inaccurate; either label the row “Open issues and pull requests” or query the issues endpoint and exclude entries containing `pull_request`.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","All three review points were valid and are fixed in f5cd355.\n\n**1. Citation pinned to a moving branch** (@chatgpt-codex-connector, @Copilot — both flagged it). The section told readers to cite a commit-pinned permalink and then handed them a `develop` URL. Fixed, but not by the suggested route: pinning to `7c169cf` would 404, because that commit is the repository state the census *describes* and predates this file. A document also cannot contain its own commit hash. So the pin is now something the citing reader produces — the section explains how (GitHub y, or `git log -1 --format=%H -- doc/adoption.md` on a clone), states the rule that an edition's permalink is the commit that bumped its version, and leaves `` as a fill-in in the BibTeX. The header note now says outright that `7c169cf` is not a permalink for this file.\n\n**2. Entry count wrong.** Confirmed by counting the classed rows: 14, not 8. The changelog now breaks it down by section (9 research / 3 distribution / 2 ecosystem), by evidence class (4×A, 5×B, 3×C, 3×D — 15 assignments over 14 rows, since the 3L-Cache row carries both A and B), and calls out that 8 of the 14 are third-party, which is the number I had conflated with the total.\n\n**3. `cache_dataset` classed B.** Correct catch, and the stronger of the three — it was the one row where the evidence didn't clear the bar its own class defines. Publishing traces in an `oracleGeneral` format libCacheSim can read is compatibility, not building on the library. Reclassified **C (used as-is)**, supported by the three tutorial notebooks in that repo that actually run libCacheSim (\"Using libCacheSim to read the dataset\", \"…to analyze and plot the trace\", \"…to run cache simulation\"), with the compatibility-vs-built-on distinction now stated explicitly next to the row. §4's heading changed from \"Ecosystem projects built on libCacheSim\" to \"Ecosystem projects and datasets\" to stop implying B for everything in it, and the cross-reference from §8 was updated.\n\nIn-page anchors and in-repo relative links were re-validated after the edits.\n\nUnchanged: `macos / clang` is still red for the reason in [the earlier comment](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/pull/323#issuecomment-5274304546) — a pre-existing `-Werror` failure on `develop` @ 7c169cf, untouched by this docs-only branch.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","## Pull request overview\n\nAdds a new documentation artifact (`doc/adoption.md`) that inventories external adoption of libCacheSim with source links and evidence classes, and links it from the main README and the docs index.\n\n**Changes:**\n- Add `doc/adoption.md` “Adoption Census” (versioned, source-linked inventory with reproduction notes).\n- Link the census from `README.md` and `doc/README.md`.\n\n### Reviewed changes\n\nCopilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.\n\n| File | Description |\n| ---- | ----------- |\n| README.md | Adds a pointer to the new adoption census document. |\n| doc/README.md | Adds the adoption census to the documentation index under a new “Project” section. |\n| doc/adoption.md | Introduces the versioned adoption census with evidence classes, tables, and reproduction/citation guidance. |\n\n\n\n\n

Suppressed comments (1)

\n\n**doc/adoption.md:242**\n* The BibTeX entry also uses the moving `develop` branch URL even though the section recommends a commit-pinned permalink. Use the snapshot commit SHA in the `url` field to make the citation stable.\n```\n year = {2026},\n month = aug,\n url = {https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/develop/doc/adoption.md},\n note = {Census date 2026-08-13; repository snapshot 7c169cf}\n```\n

\n\n\n\n---\n\n💡 Add a `code-review` agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.","The \"How to cite this census\" example says to use a commit-pinned permalink, but the example URL points at the moving `develop` branch. Update the example to use the snapshot commit SHA already listed at the top of the document so citations remain stable across edits.\n\nThis issue also appears on line 239 of the same file.",307,"The changelog claims \"8 adoption entries across research, distribution, and ecosystem\", but this file currently lists 8 research/cross-validation entries *plus* 3 distribution channels and 2 ecosystem projects. Either adjust the count or reword to avoid an internal inconsistency.","CI note: `macos / clang` is red on this PR, but it is **not caused by this PR** and I have not fixed it here.\n\nThis branch changes three markdown files only (`README.md`, `doc/README.md`, `doc/adoption.md`) — no code, build, or CI changes. The same check fails on the merge base, `develop` @ 7c169cf, where every other check is green:\n\n| Check on `develop` @ 7c169cf | Conclusion |\n|---|---|\n| `macos / clang` | **failure** |\n| `ubuntu` | success |\n| `Analyze (cpp)` | success |\n| `Code Quality Checks` | success |\n| `Scorecard analysis` | success |\n| `update-pip-graph` | success |\n\n**Root cause.** The macOS runner is now on Xcode 26.6, whose clang diagnoses `-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion`; the build uses `-Werror`, so it is fatal. Two sites in `libCacheSim/mrcProfiler/mrcProfiler.cpp` implicitly convert `UINT64_MAX` to `double`:\n\n```\nmrcProfiler.cpp:98:25: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'double'\nchanges value from 18446744073709551615 to 18446744073709551616\n[-Werror,-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]\n 98 | uint64_t sample_max = UINT64_MAX * sample_rate;\n\nmrcProfiler.cpp:216:23: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'double' ...\n 215 | sample_rate = min_value_map.get_max_value() * 1.0 /\n 216 | UINT64_MAX; // adjust the sample rate\n```\n\nThose lines were last touched in #252 (2025-07-09) and predate this branch. The Linux job is unaffected because GCC does not diagnose this.\n\n**Suggested fix, for a separate PR.** Making the conversion explicit silences it without changing behavior — `(double)UINT64_MAX` already rounds to 2⁶⁴, which is the intended full-range scale:\n\n```cpp\n// line 98\nuint64_t sample_max = static_cast(static_cast(UINT64_MAX) * sample_rate);\n\n// lines 215-216\nsample_rate = min_value_map.get_max_value() * 1.0 / static_cast(UINT64_MAX);\n```\n\nI kept it out of this PR because a docs-only change should not carry an unrelated fix to the MRC profiler, and the fix wants its own review. Happy to open that PR if you want it.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `8b5f956c1d`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Correct the adoption-entry total**\n\nThe census contains 14 rows assigned adoption classes A–D: nine research rows, three distribution rows, and two ecosystem rows. Recording only eight in the version changelog makes the historical summary inconsistent with the edition it describes and leaves future maintainers without a reliable baseline for tracking changes.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Do not classify format compatibility as built-on adoption**\n\nUnder this document's own definition, class B requires a work to be implemented on top of or extend libCacheSim, but the quoted evidence only says that this trace collection provides a format suitable for use with libCacheSim. Shipping compatible data or tutorials does not establish that `cache_dataset` itself is built on the library, so this row overstates the census unless a source showing actual implementation or execution is provided.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Pin the citation URL to this census commit**\n\nThe recommended citation points to `develop`, even though the preceding text promises a commit-pinned permalink. Once this document is revised in place, that URL will resolve to the newest edition rather than v1.0.0, preventing readers from retrieving the exact cited census; use the immutable commit URL here and in the BibTeX entry.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","docs: add source-linked adoption census (doc/adoption.md, v1.0.0)","## What this adds\n\n`doc/adoption.md` — a versioned, source-linked inventory of where libCacheSim is actually used. Every entry links to the primary source that supports it and states the **class of evidence** that source provides:\n\n| Class | Meaning |\n|---|---|\n| A | vendored / forked |\n| B | built on |\n| C | used as-is |\n| D | distributes |\n| E | cites only (recorded, **not** counted as adoption) |\n\nEntries without a checkable source are not listed.\n\n## First edition (v1.0.0, census date 2026-08-13)\n\n**Research artifacts that vendor libCacheSim** — GL-Cache (FAST '23), S3-FIFO (SOSP '23), SIEVE (NSDI '24); each artifact README describes itself as \"a snapshot of libCacheSim\".\n\n**Third-party work built on it** — 3L-Cache (FAST '25, forked from libCacheSim and later upstreamed here via #119), PolicySmith (arXiv:2510.08803), Vulcan (arXiv:2512.25065), DynamicAdaptiveClimb (arXiv:2511.21235), SCION (arXiv:2605.01055). Each row quotes the sentence in the paper that states the use.\n\n**Independent cross-validation** — the Caffeine maintainer running libCacheSim against Caffeine's own simulator to re-check published S3-FIFO/SIEVE numbers (#18), recorded separately because adversarial third-party use is stronger evidence than citation.\n\n**Distribution** — PyPI `libcachesim`, npm `libcachesim-node`, GitHub releases, with exact package state and download volume plus the caveat that download counts include CI/mirror traffic.\n\n**Ecosystem** — CacheBench (UCSC OSPO Summer of Reproducibility) and `cache_dataset`.\n\n**Deliberately kept separate:**\n- *Repository signals* (339 stars / 111 forks / 36 contributors) are reported apart from sourced adoption, and forks are explicitly not counted — nearly all are dormant snapshots.\n- *Downstream SIEVE/S3-FIFO reimplementations* (Ceph, TiDB spot-verified; the wider SIEVE-site list flagged as self-reported and unverified) are labelled **algorithm adoption, not libCacheSim adoption** — the most likely way a census like this gets misread.\n\n**Rejections are part of the record** — six candidates examined and excluded with reasons, including two name collisions (`project-kona/KCacheSim`, PyPI `cachebench`), three papers with no libCacheSim reference in the full text, and one paywalled paper marked unverified rather than assumed.\n\n**Method limits are stated** — no repo-wide code search and no citation-graph sweep were run, so the counts are an explicit lower bound. The census also notes that libCacheSim has no Zenodo DOI and no `CITATION.cff`, which is why citing a specific edition currently relies on a commit permalink.\n\n## Maintenance\n\nThe document carries a version, a census date, a repository snapshot SHA, a changelog, the exact commands to reproduce every number, and a four-item checklist for adding an entry (source URL, verbatim quote, evidence class, verification date). Linked from `README.md` and the `doc/` index.\n\n## Notes for review\n\n- Docs only — no code, build, or CI changes.\n- All in-repo relative links were checked to resolve.\n- Optional follow-up, not included here to keep the diff scoped: add a `CITATION.cff` and mint a Zenodo DOI, which would give both the software and this census stable archival identifiers.\n\n🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)\n\nhttps://claude.ai/code/session_01WCUG9YH1JDDnNwWwfg8hn4\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01WCUG9YH1JDDnNwWwfg8hn4)_","base_ref","7c169cf596fa9aa7ad3a47dee18bc6b243db1834","head_ref","pull_request_info",[683],{"_591":57,"_57":684},"I re-audited the census against raw sources rather than waiting for review to find the rest. Pushed as daddf96. **Two of my own quotations did not survive** — the most serious defects in the document so far.\n\n**Fabricated quotation (DynamicAdaptiveClimb).** The row quoted *\"We use the libcachesim simulator for our experiments.\"* That sentence does not appear anywhere in arXiv:2511.21235. The paper says:\n\n> Simulator: We conduct all evaluations using libCacheSim [46], an open-source, high-performance, and extensible cache simulator widely adopted in recent caching research.\n\nStronger evidence than what I had printed — but what I printed was not a quotation. Replaced.\n\n**Paraphrase presented as quotation (SCION).** I had the authors integrating *\"AdaptiveClimb/DynamicAdaptiveClimb\"* into libCacheSim; the paper says *\"We integrate DynamicAdaptiveClimb into libCacheSim, build a trace-conversion and evaluation pipeline for HR-Cache\"*. Replaced.\n\nBoth came from summarized fetches whose paraphrase I carried through as verbatim text. The other seven quotations verified exact against raw source, including the one this fixes them by: PolicySmith's *\"…a high-performance web cache simulator with an event-driven interface\"* is verbatim, ellipsis and all. §9 now states that quotations are matched against raw source text, records that this failure mode occurred in preparing this very edition, and gives the two commands to re-check any row — so the claim about provenance is now true, where before it was aspirational.\n\nAlso fixed in the same pass:\n\n| | |\n|---|---|\n| 3L-Cache quote | Said \"3L-Cache\"; the README reads \"3L Cache\". Corrected, fork sentence quoted in full |\n| Class E | Defined, and §1 pointed to §8 for E rows — but §8 holds rejections and this edition has no E rows. Now stated |\n| §3 distribution | Now says outright these are first-party reach, not third-party adoption. Changelog counts them apart: 11 adoption entries (8 third-party) + 3 channels = 14 sourced rows |\n| Download figures | @chatgpt-codex-connector was right about the mirrors contradiction — PyPI excludes pypistats-recognized mirrors, npm applies no filter, neither excludes CI. Stated per channel, with a warning not to compare them |\n| Gap 5 (no DOI) | Now carries evidence: DynamicAdaptiveClimb's reference [46] attributes libCacheSim to *\"S. A. Zekavat and A. Jog (2020)\"*, authors unconnected to this project. A concrete argument for shipping a `CITATION.cff` |\n| ILRU | Recorded as an unverified lead, not an entry — the only support is another paper's related-work table, which is a third party's claim about a third paper |\n\nOn the follow-up PR proposing to hard-code the citation to `f5cd355`: I'd suggest not merging it. It pins the document to a superseded revision — `f5cd355` still contains the \"Open issues: 28\" error fixed in 463d707, and would now also contain the two bad quotations fixed here. That is the failure mode the fill-in guards against, so I've left `` as a fill-in with the reasoning stated inline rather than baking in a SHA that goes stale on the next commit.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_",[715,716],[],{"_320":714},{"_317":713},{"_317":712},{"_283":284,"_273":285,"_286":287,"_288":70,"_289":18,"_290":18,"_291":292,"_293":294,"_295":244,"_296":137,"_297":298,"_299":300,"_301":-5,"_302":-5,"_303":304,"_305":-5,"_306":-5,"_307":711,"_309":310,"_311":312,"_313":314,"_315":43},{"_53":133,"_171":172,"_173":174,"_175":18,"_176":177,"_178":179,"_180":700,"_182":-5,"_183":-5,"_184":18,"_185":701,"_187":177,"_188":177,"_189":702,"_191":703,"_193":704,"_195":-5,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":201,"_202":705,"_66":-5,"_129":204,"_205":706,"_207":707,"_209":210,"_211":18,"_212":18},{"_143":693},[694,695,696],{"_155":699,"_157":168},{"_155":698,"_157":164},{"_155":697,"_157":158},{"_159":160,"_103":161,"_129":162},{"_159":165,"_103":161,"_129":166},{"_159":169,"_103":161,"_129":170},{"_275":276,"_277":278,"_279":177,"_280":-5,"_281":-5,"_282":-5},[234],{"_234":708},{"_216":217,"_218":219,"_220":221,"_222":223,"_224":225,"_226":227,"_228":229,"_230":231,"_232":233},{},[],{"_215":70},{"_213":70,"_214":177},{"_53":236,"_159":237,"_238":709,"_240":174,"_241":242,"_243":244,"_245":246,"_247":248,"_249":250,"_251":75,"_252":18,"_253":-5,"_254":-5,"_255":-5,"_256":-5,"_257":-5,"_258":-5,"_259":260,"_261":-5,"_66":710},{"_267":268,"_53":269,"_103":270,"_271":272,"_273":274},{"_263":18,"_264":18,"_265":18,"_266":18},{"_267":268,"_159":268,"_316":-5,"_271":272,"_53":269},[],[],[],{"_103":577,"_107":104,"_339":722},{"_103":324,"_325":717},[718],{"_328":329,"_330":-5,"_331":719,"_333":-5},[720],{"_335":336,"_337":338,"_339":721,"_341":70},[342,177,343,344,345,177,346,347,348,349,350,351,352,177,353,354,355,177,356,177,357,177,358,359,360,177,361,362,363,364,365,177,366,177,367,347,368,369,370,371,372,177,373,374,375,376,177,356,177,377,177,378,177,379,380,381,382,383,177,384,385,386,387,177,388,177,389,380,390,391,392,393,394,177,395,177,396,380,397,177,398,399,400,177,356,177,401,177,402,403,404,405,406,407,177,408,380,409,410,411,177,412,413,414,415,416,177,417,418,419,420,421,177,356,177,422,177,423,424,425,426,177,427,177,356,177,428,177,429,430,177,431,347,432,433,434,435,436,437,438,177,439,440,441,442,443,177,444,445,446,177,356,177,447,177,448,177,449,450,451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,177,356,177,472,177,473,474,475,476,177,477,177,478,479,480,481,177,482,483,484,485,486,177,356,177,487,177,488,489,177,490,347,491,492,493,494,495,496,177,497,498,499,500,177,356,177,501,177,502,177,503,504,505,177,506,507,177,508,509,510,511,512,513,177,514,177,503,515,516,517,513,177,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,177,526,177,503,527,528,177,529,530,531,532,513,177,533,534,177,535,536,537,538,177,356,177,539,177,540,541,542,543,177,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551,177,552,177,513,553,554,555,556,513,177,557,558,559,560,561,562,563,564,565,566,567,568,569,570,513,177,571,572,177,573,177,356,177,574,177,575,479,576],[723,724,725,726,727,728,729,730,731,732,733,734],{"_591":57,"_57":609},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":607,"_337":608},{"_591":57,"_57":606},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":604,"_337":605},{"_591":57,"_57":603},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":601,"_337":602},{"_591":57,"_57":600},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":598,"_337":599},{"_591":57,"_57":597},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":595,"_337":596},{"_591":593,"_328":329,"_335":594,"_337":338},{"_591":57,"_57":592},[737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,749,750,751,752,753],{"_619":620,"_240":174,"_621":284,"_251":-5,"_622":234,"_623":18,"_624":-5,"_625":-5,"_626":627,"_628":629,"_630":-5,"_631":-5,"_632":633,"_634":18,"_635":70,"_636":65,"_637":18,"_638":-5},{"_103":577,"_107":307,"_339":754},{"_291":676,"_293":677,"_678":679,"_680":139,"_303":-5,"_103":681},{"_103":656,"_293":675,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":674,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":673,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":672,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":671,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":670,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":668,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":669},{"_103":656,"_293":667,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":666,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":665,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":664,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":663,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":662,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":660,"_328":329,"_658":661,"_659":-5},{"_103":656,"_293":657,"_328":-5,"_658":-5,"_659":-5},[755],{"_591":57,"_57":684},"task_e_6a7d0fbe65a08322bcfa0aee18a4c37f",1786580926.39732,"GitHub Mention: docs: add source-linked adoption census (doc/adoption.md, v1.0.0)","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_787":43,"_788":789,"_790":-5,"_791":-5,"_782":792,"_793":-5,"_794":-5,"_795":-5,"_796":-5},"task_status_display",{"_775":776,"_777":174,"_140":137,"_778":-5,"_779":780},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[768],{"_53":769,"_770":94,"_771":772,"_773":139},"github-273598269-323","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_283":284,"_273":285,"_286":287,"_288":70,"_289":18,"_290":18,"_291":292,"_293":294,"_295":244,"_296":137,"_297":298,"_299":300,"_301":-5,"_302":-5,"_303":304,"_305":-5,"_306":-5,"_307":774,"_309":310,"_311":312,"_313":314,"_315":43},"codex_updated_sha",{"_267":268,"_159":268,"_316":-5,"_271":272,"_53":269},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_781":94,"_122":123,"_782":-5,"_105":783,"_784":-5,"_785":-5,"_786":780,"_124":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","pr","turn_id","diff_stats",[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_797":-5,"_798":-5,"_799":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","files_modified","lines_added","lines_removed","dd",{"_814":815,"_816":817},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","manageRootRouteStylesheet","mobileWebHandoffEnabled","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","paidCampaignAppRedirect","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",813],"traceId","14291752478597780454","traceTime",1788046980362]