Just a moment...

\n\\ No newline at end of file\n","external_storage_diff",{"_348":349,"_350":-5},"files_modified",1,"lines_added","lines_removed","commit_message","docs: remove accidentally committed challenge page","additional_parent_commit_shas",[],"file_id","file_000000002b3481f7b966355f2f1f31f2","ttl","partial_repo_snapshot","files",[354],{"_355":356,"_357":-5,"_358":359,"_360":-5},"path","doc/adoption.md","contents","line_range_contents",[361],"missing_reason",{"_362":341,"_363":364,"_365":366,"_367":70},"line_range_start","line_range_end",239,"content",[368,178,369,370,371,178,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,178,379,380,381,178,382,178,383,178,384,385,386,178,387,388,389,390,391,178,392,178,393,373,394,395,396,397,398,178,399,400,401,178,382,178,402,178,403,178,404,405,406,407,408,178,409,410,411,412,178,413,178,414,405,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422,178,423,178,424,405,425,178,426,427,428,178,382,178,429,178,430,431,432,433,434,435,178,436,405,437,438,439,178,440,441,442,443,444,178,445,446,447,448,449,178,382,178,450,178,451,452,453,454,178,455,456,457,458,178,459,460,461,462,463,178,382,178,464,178,465,466,178,467,373,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,178,475,476,477,478,479,178,480,481,482,178,382,178,483,178,484,485,486,487,178,488,178,489,490,491,492,178,493,494,495,496,497,178,382,178,498,178,499,500,501,502,178,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,178,511,178,512,513,514,515,516,512,178,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,512,178,531,532,178,533,178,382,178,534,178,535,490,536],"contains_end_of_file","# libCacheSim Adoption Census","A source-linked inventory of where libCacheSim is used. Every entry carries a link to","the primary source that supports it, plus the class of evidence that link provides.","Entries without a checkable source do not appear.","| | |","|---|---|","| **Census version** | `1.0.0` |","| **Census date** | 2026-08-13 |","| **Repository snapshot** | `develop` @ [`7c169cf`](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/commit/7c169cf596fa9aa7ad3a47dee18bc6b243db1834); latest release [`v0.3.5`](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/releases/tag/v0.3.5) (2026-03-15) |","| **Verification window** | All sources in this edition were fetched and re-read on 2026-08-13 |","| **Canonical location** | [`doc/adoption.md`](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/develop/doc/adoption.md) in this repository |","This file is the versioned artifact: it is revised in place, each revision bumps the","census version and appends to the [changelog](#changelog), and any revision can be","cited by its commit permalink. See [How to cite this census](#how-to-cite-this-census).","---","## 1. Scope and inclusion criteria","**In scope — adoption of libCacheSim itself.** A project, paper, or package is listed","only if a primary source shows it *builds on, bundles, forks, distributes, or runs*","libCacheSim.","**Out of scope — adoption of algorithms that happen to have been developed here.**","SIEVE and S3-FIFO were designed and evaluated with libCacheSim, and both are now","reimplemented in many third-party systems. Those systems are *not* libCacheSim users;","they are downstream of the research. They are tracked separately and explicitly","labelled in [§6](#6-downstream-algorithm-adoption-not-libcachesim-adoption).","**Evidence classes.** Every row states which class its source supports:","| Class | Meaning |","| **A — vendored / forked** | The source tree contains a copy or fork of libCacheSim |","| **B — built on** | The work states it is implemented on top of, or extends, libCacheSim |","| **C — used as-is** | The work states it ran libCacheSim as its simulator or harness |","| **D — distributes** | The project ships libCacheSim to users as a package or binding |","| **E — cites only** | The work cites libCacheSim without a checkable statement of use |","Class E entries would be recorded but *not* counted as adoption. This edition has none:","every candidate that got as far as being read either cleared class C or turned out not to","reference libCacheSim at all. The class is kept defined for editions that need it.","## 2. Research artifacts and publications","### 2.1 First-party (authored by libCacheSim maintainers)","| Work | Venue | Class | Evidence | Source |","|---|---|---|---|---|","| GL-Cache: Group-level learning for efficient and high-performance caching | FAST '23 | A | Artifact README, on the micro-implementation half of the artifact: \"It is a snapshot of [libCacheSim](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim).\" That directory reproduces libCacheSim's own README and `doc/` tree. | [Thesys-lab/fast23-GLCache](https://github.com/Thesys-lab/fast23-GLCache), [USENIX](https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/yang-juncheng) |","| FIFO queues are all you need for cache eviction (S3-FIFO) | SOSP '23 | A | Artifact README: \"The repo is a snapshot of [libCacheSim](https://github.com/cacheMon/libCacheSim), modified cachelib, and distComp.\" Simulations are run through its `cachesim` binary. | [Thesys-lab/sosp23-s3fifo](https://github.com/Thesys-lab/sosp23-s3fifo), [ACM DL](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3600006.3613147) |","| SIEVE is Simpler than LRU | NSDI '24 | A | Artifact README lists its simulator as \"a snapshot of libCacheSim\", and directs readers to libCacheSim for build instructions. | [Thesys-lab/NSDI24-SIEVE](https://github.com/Thesys-lab/NSDI24-SIEVE), [USENIX](https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi24/presentation/zhang-yazhuo) |","The remaining first-party papers in [`references.md`](/references.md) (OSDI '20 workload","analysis, HotOS '23 QD-LP) ship their algorithms in this repository — e.g.","[`QDLP.c`](/libCacheSim/cache/eviction/QDLP.c) — but their standalone artifacts were not","re-verified for this edition, so they are not tabulated above.","### 2.2 Third-party","| Work | Venue / date | Class | Evidence | Source |","| 3L-Cache: Low Overhead and Precise Learning-based Eviction Policy for Caches — Wenbin Zhou, Zhixiong Niu, Yongqiang Xiong, Juan Fang, Qian Wang (Beijing Univ. of Technology; Microsoft Research) | FAST '25 | A + B | Artifact README: \"3L Cache is implemented in the [libCacheSim] library, and its experimental environment configuration is consistent with libCacheSim\"; repository layout notes \"Forked from LibCacheSim, which is a platform for cache evaluation\". The algorithm was subsequently upstreamed into this repository. | [optiq-lab/3L-Cache](https://github.com/optiq-lab/3L-Cache), [USENIX](https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast25/presentation/zhou-wenbin), [issue #119](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/issues/119), [`3LCache/`](/libCacheSim/cache/eviction/3LCache/) |","| Man-Made Heuristics Are Dead. Long Live Code Generators! (PolicySmith) — Dwivedula, Saxena, Akella, Chaudhuri, Kim (UT Austin) | HotNets '25 | B | \"Our prototype is built on libCacheSim, a high-performance web cache simulator with an event-driven interface.\" | [ACM DL](https://doi.org/10.1145/3772356.3772413), [arXiv:2510.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08803) |","| Cache is King: Smart Page Eviction with eBPF — Zussman, Zarkadas, Carin, Cheng, Franke, Pfefferle, Cidon (Columbia; IBM Research) | arXiv, Feb 2025 | B | \"We implement LHD using cachebpf, based on the implementation in libcachesim [69, 70, 72].\" The eBPF page-cache port is derived from libCacheSim's LHD implementation. | [arXiv:2502.02750](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02750) |","| MetaMuse: Algorithm Generation via Creative Ideation — Ruiying Ma, Chieh-Jan Mike Liang, Yanjie Gao, Francis Y. Yan (Microsoft Research) | arXiv, Oct 2025 | C | \"For cache replacement, these n traces are generated by libCacheSim (Yang et al. 2020), from different Zipfian distributions.\" Used as the trace generator for its cache-replacement evaluation. | [arXiv:2510.03851](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03851) |","| T3-LRU: Three-Tier Hotness-Aware Concurrent Cache Eviction Algorithm — Zhang Xin et al. | Research Square preprint, 2026 | A | Evaluated in a fork of libCacheSim, archived as software: \"rim99/libCacheSim: T3LRU Simulation … a high performance library for building cache simulators & T3-LRU simulation added\". The preprint links both the fork and upstream libCacheSim. | [preprint](https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10049449/v1), [Zenodo](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20713182), [rim99/libCacheSim](https://github.com/rim99/libCacheSim/tree/0.1.0) |","| Vulcan: Instance-specialized, Verifiable Systems Heuristics Through LLM-driven Search — Dwivedula, Saxena, Yadalam, Campbell, Kim, Akella | arXiv, Dec 2025 | B | \"The scaffolding, implemented on top of `libCacheSim`, is responsible for instantiating the queues that are a part of the topology\"; libCacheSim measures object hit rate for candidate heuristics. | [arXiv:2512.25065](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.25065) |","| DynamicAdaptiveClimb: Adaptive Cache Replacement with Dynamic Resizing — Berend, Dolev, Kumari, Mishra, Kogan-Sadetsky, Somani | arXiv, Nov 2025 | C | \"Simulator: We conduct all evaluations using libCacheSim [46], an open-source, high-performance, and extensible cache simulator widely adopted in recent caching research.\" Its related-work table also attributes SIEVE, 3L, ILRU, and both of its own policies to libCacheSim as the evaluation platform. | [arXiv:2511.21235](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21235) |","| SCION: Size-aware Policy Orchestration for Nonstationary Object Caches — Qizhi Wang (PingCAP) | arXiv, 2026 | B | \"We implement a trace-driven benchmark in C++ on top of libCacheSim [25].\" The artifact contribution is stated as \"We integrate DynamicAdaptiveClimb into libCacheSim, build a trace-conversion and evaluation pipeline for HR-Cache\". | [arXiv:2605.01055](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01055) |","### 2.3 Independent cross-validation","| Who | What | Class | Evidence | Source |","| Ben Manes (maintainer, [Caffeine](https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine)) | Ran libCacheSim side-by-side with Caffeine's simulator to re-check published S3-FIFO/SIEVE hit-ratio results, and reported a size-accounting discrepancy back to this project | C | \"I used libcachesim at 0f4d135 (current master) … with this patch to include the new trace formats.\" | [issue #18](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/issues/18) |","This is the clearest instance of libCacheSim being used *adversarially* by a third party","— an outside maintainer reproducing the project's own numbers — which makes it worth","recording separately from citation-style use.","## 3. Distribution channels","These rows are **first-party reach, not third-party adoption** — the project publishing","itself. They are tabulated because availability is what adoption elsewhere depends on,","and because release cadence and download volume are the only quantitative series this","census can track over time. The counts in the [changelog](#changelog) keep them separate","from the adoption entries in [§2](#2-research-artifacts-and-publications) and","[§4](#4-ecosystem-projects-and-datasets).","| Channel | Package | Class | State on 2026-08-13 | Source |","| PyPI | `libcachesim` (Python bindings, maintained under the cacheMon org) | D | Latest `0.3.3.post4` (2026-02-17); first release `0.3.2` (2025-07-14); 5 releases; requires Python ≥ 3.10; GPLv3+ | [PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/libcachesim/), [cacheMon/libCacheSim-python](https://github.com/cacheMon/libCacheSim-python) |","| npm | `libcachesim-node` (Node.js bindings, in-tree at [`libCacheSim-node/`](/libCacheSim-node)) | D | Latest `0.3.2` (2025-07-14); first publish `1.0.0` (2025-06-18); MIT | [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/libcachesim-node) |","| GitHub Releases | source releases | D | 5 releases, `v0.1` → `v0.3.5` (2026-03-15) | [Releases](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/releases) |","**Download volume.** PyPI, via [pypistats.org](https://pypistats.org/packages/libcachesim)","with `mirrors=false`: 1,805 downloads over the 2026-02-12 → 2026-08-11 window the API","exposes, 258 of them in the trailing 30 days. npm `libcachesim-node`: 173 downloads in","the trailing year","([npm downloads API](https://api.npmjs.org/downloads/point/last-year/libcachesim-node)).","The two figures are not filtered alike, so do not add them or compare them directly. The","PyPI figure excludes the mirrors pypistats recognizes; the npm endpoint applies no mirror","filter at all. Neither excludes CI, container builds, or other automated installs, which","on a research library plausibly dominate. Treat both as a weak proxy recorded for","trend-tracking across editions, never as a user count.","## 4. Ecosystem projects and datasets","| Project | Class | Evidence | Source |","|---|---|---|---|","| **CacheBench** — benchmarking suite evaluating 18 eviction algorithms across thousands of traces, developed by Haocheng Xia (UIUC, visiting Harvard) under the UCSC OSPO Summer of Reproducibility | B | Report describes libCacheSim as a core component and the project as \"a Python package that allows users to easily download traces and run simulation analyses using libCacheSim\" | [UCSC OSPO report](https://ucsc-ospo.github.io/report/osre25/harvard/cachebench/2025-08-06-haochengxia/) |","| **cache_dataset** — open collection of production cache traces (Meta, Twitter, CloudPhysics, Microsoft, Wikimedia, Alibaba, Tencent) | C | Ships three tutorial notebooks that run libCacheSim — \"Using libCacheSim to read the dataset\", \"…to analyze and plot the trace\", \"…to run cache simulation\". The dataset itself is *format-compatible* rather than built on the library: \"We provide both plain text format … and `oracleGeneral` format that is suitable for using with [libCacheSim] platform.\" | [cacheMon/cache_dataset](https://github.com/cacheMon/cache_dataset) |","Note the class distinction between these two rows: CacheBench is implemented on top of","libCacheSim (B), whereas cache_dataset publishes traces in a libCacheSim-readable format","and drives the tool from tutorials (C). Shipping a compatible format alone would not","qualify for either class.","Both rows are **project-affiliated, not third-party**: cache_dataset is published under","the same cacheMon organization that maintains the Python bindings, and CacheBench was","built by a libCacheSim collaborator under project mentorship. They are counted as","adoption entries — the software is genuinely used — but not toward the third-party","subtotal in the [changelog](#changelog).","## 5. Repository signals","Aggregate signals from the GitHub API on 2026-08-13. These measure attention and","contribution, not deployment, and are listed apart from sourced adoption for that reason.","| Signal | Value |","| Stars | 339 |","| Forks | 111 |","| Contributors (non-anonymous) | 36 |","| Open issues (excluding pull requests) | 21 |","| Open pull requests | 8 |","| Created | 2020-06-19 |","| License | GPL-3.0 |","The two counts are split deliberately. The repository endpoint's `open_issues_count`","field — 29 at census time — is **not** an issue count: GitHub counts pull requests as","issues there, so the field is the sum of the two rows above. Reading it as \"open issues\"","would overstate the backlog and corrupt trend comparisons between editions. The 8 open","pull requests include the one that added this document.","Forks were enumerated and are *not* treated as adoption: nearly all are dormant","snapshots with no divergent description or activity. Known research forks that do carry","independent work are listed by name in [§2.2](#22-third-party) instead.","## 6. Downstream algorithm adoption (not libCacheSim adoption)","SIEVE (NSDI '24) and S3-FIFO (SOSP '23) were developed and evaluated with libCacheSim,","and are now reimplemented in third-party systems. **These systems do not use","libCacheSim.** They are recorded because they are the research output's reach, and","conflating the two is the most likely way this census could be misread.","Spot-verified for this edition:","| System | Evidence | Source |","|---|---|---|","| Ceph | `src/common/web_cache.h` header comment: \"The implementation is based on SIEVE [0] with additional TTL\", citing the NSDI '24 paper directly; contains `SieveQueue`, `_sieve_hand`, `sieve_evict()` | [ceph/ceph](https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/main/src/common/web_cache.h) |","| TiDB | `pkg/infoschema/sieve.go` implements a SIEVE cache (per-entry `visited` flag) | [pingcap/tidb](https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/blob/master/pkg/infoschema/sieve.go) |","A broader list — immudb, DragonFly, dnscrypt-proxy, PostgREST, Pelikan, SkiftOS,","Nyrkiö, plus 20+ language-level cache libraries — is maintained on the","[SIEVE project site](https://cachemon.github.io/SIEVE-website/). That list is","project-maintained and partly self-reported; apart from the two rows above, its entries","were **not** independently verified for this edition.","## How to cite this census","This document is revised in place, so the `develop` URL below always resolves to the","*newest* edition. To cite the exact edition you read, resolve it to a commit permalink","first — a document cannot contain its own commit hash, so the pin is something the","citing reader produces:","- **On GitHub:** open the file and press y. The URL rewrites from"," `.../blob/develop/doc/adoption.md` to `.../blob//doc/adoption.md`, which is"," immutable.","- **From a clone:** `git log -1 --format=%H -- doc/adoption.md` gives the commit of the"," edition you have checked out.","- **Rule:** each edition's permalink is the commit that bumped its census version — the"," same commit that added its row to the [changelog](#changelog). Earlier editions stay"," reachable through the file's History view.","Fill the pinned commit into the `url` field when citing:","```","libCacheSim Adoption Census, version 1.0.0 (census date 2026-08-13).","libCacheSim project documentation, doc/adoption.md.","Newest edition: https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/develop/doc/adoption.md","Cited edition: https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob//doc/adoption.md","```bibtex","@techreport{libcachesim-adoption-census-2026,"," title = {libCacheSim Adoption Census},"," author = {{libCacheSim maintainers}},"," institution = {libCacheSim project},"," type = {Project documentation},"," number = {census v1.0.0},"," year = {2026},"," month = aug,"," % replace with the permalink commit of the edition you read (see above);"," % https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/develop/doc/adoption.md is the newest"," url = {https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob//doc/adoption.md},"," note = {Census date 2026-08-13; repository snapshot at census time 7c169cf}","}","`7c169cf` in the header is the repository state the census describes, **not** a","permalink for this file — that commit predates the file and will not resolve.","To cite libCacheSim itself, use the BibTeX entries in [`references.md`](/references.md).","## Changelog","| Version | Date | Change |","| 1.0.0 | 2026-08-13 | First edition. **14 adoption entries** — 12 research (3 first-party artifacts, 8 third-party works, 1 independent cross-validation) and 2 project-affiliated ecosystem projects — of which **9 are third-party**. Plus 3 first-party distribution channels, which are reach rather than adoption, for **17 sourced rows** total. By evidence class: 5×A, 6×B, 4×C, 3×D (18 assignments over 17 rows — the 3L-Cache row carries both A and B). Repository signals and downstream algorithm adoption are recorded separately and excluded from every count above. |","message",[539,540,541,542,543],{"_544":57,"_57":551},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":549,"_363":550},{"_544":57,"_57":548},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":547,"_363":364},{"_544":57,"_57":545},"content_type","\n* Committed the cleanup as `79883d7` (`docs: remove accidentally committed challenge page`) and prepared the follow-up PR titled **“docs: remove an accidentally committed ACM challenge page.”**\n\n**Testing**\n\n* ✅ `git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD`\n* ✅ `git show --check --stat --oneline HEAD`\n* ✅ `git status --short --branch` (clean working tree)","repo_file_citation",235,"\n* Retained the corrected census totals: 14 adoption entries, 9 third-party entries, 3 distribution channels, and 17 sourced rows. ",69,72,"### Summary\n\n* Removed the accidentally committed `acm_scaleopt.html` file, which contained only a Cloudflare challenge response captured while checking the ScaleOPT source.\n* Preserved the expanded census entries for Cache is King, MetaMuse, and T3-LRU, along with PolicySmith’s updated HotNets ’25 venue. ",{"_104":308,"_53":96,"_108":308,"_554":555,"_556":557,"_558":559,"_143":-5,"_130":560},[95],"input_items",[580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597,598,599,600],"external_post_config",{"_561":562,"_241":175,"_563":285,"_252":-5,"_334":235,"_564":18,"_565":-5,"_566":-5,"_567":568,"_569":570,"_571":-5,"_572":-5,"_573":574,"_575":18,"_576":70,"_577":65,"_578":18,"_579":-5},"user_model_slug","slug",1786581506.271182,"installation_id",116436525,"pr_number","enable_internal_github_app_routing","gitlab_service_account_project_id","review_trigger","comment_id",5274482730,"comment_type","issue","pr_write_guard_token","pending_pr_reaction_id","pending_comment_reaction_id",397142382,"comment_if_no_findings","comment_on_error","share_url","is_parallel_review","review_summary_id",{"_104":537,"_108":308,"_365":631},{"_292":625,"_294":626,"_627":628,"_629":140,"_304":-5,"_104":630},{"_104":601,"_294":624,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":623,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":622,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":621,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":620,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":619,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":617,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":618},{"_104":601,"_294":616,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":615,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":614,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":613,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":612,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":611,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":610,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":609,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":608,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":607,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":605,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":602,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},"pull_request_comment","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `eac94d2728`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

\n
\n\n[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you\n- Open a pull request for review\n- Mark a draft as ready\n- Comment \"@codex review\".\n\nIf Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.\n\n\n\n\nCodex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting \"@codex address that feedback\".\n \n

","side","line","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Exclude cache_dataset from the third-party count**\n\nIn the revised breakdown, the **8 third-party** subtotal can only be reached by treating both ecosystem rows as third-party. However, `cache_dataset` is owned by the same cacheMon organization identified above as maintaining libCacheSim's first-party Python bindings, and this repository's README describes it as a dataset “we provide.” The third-party subtotal is therefore 7 (five §2.2 works, one independent cross-validation, and CacheBench), while the overall 11-adoption-entry and 14-sourced-row totals remain unchanged.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","RIGHT","### Summary\n\n* Verified that commit `daddf96` is already checked out and contains the requested corrections. The DynamicAdaptiveClimb and SCION rows now use the exact source wording, and the 3L Cache quotation matches its source formatting. [doc/adoption.mdL69-L73](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L69-L73)\n* Confirmed that distribution channels are explicitly separated from third-party adoption and that PyPI/npm download filtering is described per channel without suggesting the figures are comparable. [doc/adoption.mdL87-L112](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L87-L112)\n* Confirmed that the citation guidance retains the `` placeholder rather than pinning version 1.0.0 to a superseded revision; it explains how readers resolve the edition-specific immutable commit. [doc/adoption.mdL284-L320](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L284-L320)\n* Confirmed that raw-source quotation verification and reproduction commands are documented, including the summarized-fetch failure mode encountered while preparing this edition. [doc/adoption.mdL253-L275](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L253-L275)\n* Confirmed that ILRU remains an unverified lead rather than an adoption entry and that the corrected changelog distinguishes 11 adoption entries from three first-party distribution channels. [doc/adoption.mdL220-L223](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L220-L223) [doc/adoption.mdL332-L336](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/daddf966d6e4335a2892c58685a8d6ac502bc407/doc/adoption.md#L332-L336)\n* No additional changes were necessary: the working tree is clean at `daddf96`. Consequently, I did not create another commit or a redundant follow-up pull request.\n\n**Testing**\n\n* ✅ `git show --check HEAD`\n* ✅ `python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` (checked removal of the fabricated quotation, presence of both corrected quotations, corrected counts, channel-specific mirror caveat, and `` citation placeholder)\n* ✅ `git status --short --branch` (clean working tree on branch `work`)\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a7d0fc1093c81919097a961f46835ec)","I re-audited the census against raw sources rather than waiting for review to find the rest. Pushed as daddf96. **Two of my own quotations did not survive** — the most serious defects in the document so far.\n\n**Fabricated quotation (DynamicAdaptiveClimb).** The row quoted *\"We use the libcachesim simulator for our experiments.\"* That sentence does not appear anywhere in arXiv:2511.21235. The paper says:\n\n> Simulator: We conduct all evaluations using libCacheSim [46], an open-source, high-performance, and extensible cache simulator widely adopted in recent caching research.\n\nStronger evidence than what I had printed — but what I printed was not a quotation. Replaced.\n\n**Paraphrase presented as quotation (SCION).** I had the authors integrating *\"AdaptiveClimb/DynamicAdaptiveClimb\"* into libCacheSim; the paper says *\"We integrate DynamicAdaptiveClimb into libCacheSim, build a trace-conversion and evaluation pipeline for HR-Cache\"*. Replaced.\n\nBoth came from summarized fetches whose paraphrase I carried through as verbatim text. The other seven quotations verified exact against raw source, including the one this fixes them by: PolicySmith's *\"…a high-performance web cache simulator with an event-driven interface\"* is verbatim, ellipsis and all. §9 now states that quotations are matched against raw source text, records that this failure mode occurred in preparing this very edition, and gives the two commands to re-check any row — so the claim about provenance is now true, where before it was aspirational.\n\nAlso fixed in the same pass:\n\n| | |\n|---|---|\n| 3L-Cache quote | Said \"3L-Cache\"; the README reads \"3L Cache\". Corrected, fork sentence quoted in full |\n| Class E | Defined, and §1 pointed to §8 for E rows — but §8 holds rejections and this edition has no E rows. Now stated |\n| §3 distribution | Now says outright these are first-party reach, not third-party adoption. Changelog counts them apart: 11 adoption entries (8 third-party) + 3 channels = 14 sourced rows |\n| Download figures | @chatgpt-codex-connector was right about the mirrors contradiction — PyPI excludes pypistats-recognized mirrors, npm applies no filter, neither excludes CI. Stated per channel, with a warning not to compare them |\n| Gap 5 (no DOI) | Now carries evidence: DynamicAdaptiveClimb's reference [46] attributes libCacheSim to *\"S. A. Zekavat and A. Jog (2020)\"*, authors unconnected to this project. A concrete argument for shipping a `CITATION.cff` |\n| ILRU | Recorded as an unverified lead, not an entry — the only support is another paper's related-work table, which is a third party's claim about a third paper |\n\nOn the follow-up PR proposing to hard-code the citation to `f5cd355`: I'd suggest not merging it. It pins the document to a superseded revision — `f5cd355` still contains the \"Open issues: 28\" error fixed in 463d707, and would now also contain the two bad quotations fixed here. That is the failure mode the fill-in guards against, so I've left `` as a fill-in with the reasoning stated inline rather than baking in a SHA that goes stale on the next commit.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `463d7075c8`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} State consistently whether mirror downloads are excluded**\n\nFor the PyPI total, this caveat contradicts the heading on line 93 and the reproduction request's `mirrors=false`: readers are first told that mirrors were excluded, then that the reported download counts include mirror traffic. This affects how the 1,805-download baseline is interpreted in future trend comparisons; qualify the caveat by channel or state that the PyPI figure excludes the mirrors filtered by pypistats.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","### Summary\n* Pinned the version 1.0.0 adoption census citation to the immutable corrected revision, `f5cd355`, while retaining instructions for resolving future editions. [doc/adoption.mdL223-L236](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md#L223-L236)\n* Replaced the placeholder citation URL with the directly usable commit permalink in both the plain-text citation and BibTeX entry. [doc/adoption.mdL238-L258](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md#L238-L258)\n* Committed the change as `f56ce5b` (`docs: pin adoption census citation`) and prepared a follow-up PR titled **“docs: pin the adoption census citation to its corrected edition.”**\n\n**Testing**\n* ✅ `git diff --check`\n* ✅ `python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` (validated in-page anchors and repository-relative links)\n* ✅ `curl -fsSIL 'https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/f5cd355844e302c8e6c8bf1a24f7c48149f8fc04/doc/adoption.md' | head -n 1` (HTTP 200)\n* ✅ `git show --check --stat --oneline HEAD`\n\n [View task →](https://chatgpt.com/s/cd_6a7d0d6794188191b525f6e01f7106ff)","Valid, and it was a wrong number rather than an imprecise label — fixed in 463d707.\n\n`open_issues_count` from the repository endpoint counts pull requests as issues, so the \"Open issues: 28\" row was the sum of two different things. Deriving the split from `/issues?state=open` and filtering entries carrying a `pull_request` key:\n\n| | at census time |\n|---|---|\n| Open issues | 21 |\n| Open pull requests | 8 (incl. this PR) |\n| `open_issues_count` field | 29 |\n\nThe row is now two rows with the pitfall stated inline, since a future maintainer refreshing this section is exactly who would step on it again. The reproduction snippet in §9 drops `open_issues_count` and shows the filtered query instead, with a note to paginate past 100 open items so the count cannot truncate silently.\n\nIncidentally this PR demonstrated the bug while it was being reported: the field read 28 when the census was taken and 29 once #323 was opened, with no issue having been filed.\n\nCensus version stays at 1.0.0 — the edition has not been published yet, so these are corrections to it rather than a new edition.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `f5cd355844`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Separate pull requests from the open-issue count**\n\nWhen the repository has open pull requests, this value is not the number of open issues: the reproduction command on lines 199–200 reads GitHub's `open_issues_count`, which includes both issues and pull requests. This makes the census signal and future trend comparisons inaccurate; either label the row “Open issues and pull requests” or query the issues endpoint and exclude entries containing `pull_request`.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","All three review points were valid and are fixed in f5cd355.\n\n**1. Citation pinned to a moving branch** (@chatgpt-codex-connector, @Copilot — both flagged it). The section told readers to cite a commit-pinned permalink and then handed them a `develop` URL. Fixed, but not by the suggested route: pinning to `7c169cf` would 404, because that commit is the repository state the census *describes* and predates this file. A document also cannot contain its own commit hash. So the pin is now something the citing reader produces — the section explains how (GitHub y, or `git log -1 --format=%H -- doc/adoption.md` on a clone), states the rule that an edition's permalink is the commit that bumped its version, and leaves `` as a fill-in in the BibTeX. The header note now says outright that `7c169cf` is not a permalink for this file.\n\n**2. Entry count wrong.** Confirmed by counting the classed rows: 14, not 8. The changelog now breaks it down by section (9 research / 3 distribution / 2 ecosystem), by evidence class (4×A, 5×B, 3×C, 3×D — 15 assignments over 14 rows, since the 3L-Cache row carries both A and B), and calls out that 8 of the 14 are third-party, which is the number I had conflated with the total.\n\n**3. `cache_dataset` classed B.** Correct catch, and the stronger of the three — it was the one row where the evidence didn't clear the bar its own class defines. Publishing traces in an `oracleGeneral` format libCacheSim can read is compatibility, not building on the library. Reclassified **C (used as-is)**, supported by the three tutorial notebooks in that repo that actually run libCacheSim (\"Using libCacheSim to read the dataset\", \"…to analyze and plot the trace\", \"…to run cache simulation\"), with the compatibility-vs-built-on distinction now stated explicitly next to the row. §4's heading changed from \"Ecosystem projects built on libCacheSim\" to \"Ecosystem projects and datasets\" to stop implying B for everything in it, and the cross-reference from §8 was updated.\n\nIn-page anchors and in-repo relative links were re-validated after the edits.\n\nUnchanged: `macos / clang` is still red for the reason in [the earlier comment](https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/pull/323#issuecomment-5274304546) — a pre-existing `-Werror` failure on `develop` @ 7c169cf, untouched by this docs-only branch.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","## Pull request overview\n\nAdds a new documentation artifact (`doc/adoption.md`) that inventories external adoption of libCacheSim with source links and evidence classes, and links it from the main README and the docs index.\n\n**Changes:**\n- Add `doc/adoption.md` “Adoption Census” (versioned, source-linked inventory with reproduction notes).\n- Link the census from `README.md` and `doc/README.md`.\n\n### Reviewed changes\n\nCopilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.\n\n| File | Description |\n| ---- | ----------- |\n| README.md | Adds a pointer to the new adoption census document. |\n| doc/README.md | Adds the adoption census to the documentation index under a new “Project” section. |\n| doc/adoption.md | Introduces the versioned adoption census with evidence classes, tables, and reproduction/citation guidance. |\n\n\n\n\n

Suppressed comments (1)

\n\n**doc/adoption.md:242**\n* The BibTeX entry also uses the moving `develop` branch URL even though the section recommends a commit-pinned permalink. Use the snapshot commit SHA in the `url` field to make the citation stable.\n```\n year = {2026},\n month = aug,\n url = {https://github.com/1a1a11a/libCacheSim/blob/develop/doc/adoption.md},\n note = {Census date 2026-08-13; repository snapshot 7c169cf}\n```\n

\n\n\n\n---\n\n💡 Add a `code-review` agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.","The \"How to cite this census\" example says to use a commit-pinned permalink, but the example URL points at the moving `develop` branch. Update the example to use the snapshot commit SHA already listed at the top of the document so citations remain stable across edits.\n\nThis issue also appears on line 239 of the same file.",210,"The changelog claims \"8 adoption entries across research, distribution, and ecosystem\", but this file currently lists 8 research/cross-validation entries *plus* 3 distribution channels and 2 ecosystem projects. Either adjust the count or reword to avoid an internal inconsistency.","CI note: `macos / clang` is red on this PR, but it is **not caused by this PR** and I have not fixed it here.\n\nThis branch changes three markdown files only (`README.md`, `doc/README.md`, `doc/adoption.md`) — no code, build, or CI changes. The same check fails on the merge base, `develop` @ 7c169cf, where every other check is green:\n\n| Check on `develop` @ 7c169cf | Conclusion |\n|---|---|\n| `macos / clang` | **failure** |\n| `ubuntu` | success |\n| `Analyze (cpp)` | success |\n| `Code Quality Checks` | success |\n| `Scorecard analysis` | success |\n| `update-pip-graph` | success |\n\n**Root cause.** The macOS runner is now on Xcode 26.6, whose clang diagnoses `-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion`; the build uses `-Werror`, so it is fatal. Two sites in `libCacheSim/mrcProfiler/mrcProfiler.cpp` implicitly convert `UINT64_MAX` to `double`:\n\n```\nmrcProfiler.cpp:98:25: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'double'\nchanges value from 18446744073709551615 to 18446744073709551616\n[-Werror,-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]\n 98 | uint64_t sample_max = UINT64_MAX * sample_rate;\n\nmrcProfiler.cpp:216:23: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'double' ...\n 215 | sample_rate = min_value_map.get_max_value() * 1.0 /\n 216 | UINT64_MAX; // adjust the sample rate\n```\n\nThose lines were last touched in #252 (2025-07-09) and predate this branch. The Linux job is unaffected because GCC does not diagnose this.\n\n**Suggested fix, for a separate PR.** Making the conversion explicit silences it without changing behavior — `(double)UINT64_MAX` already rounds to 2⁶⁴, which is the intended full-range scale:\n\n```cpp\n// line 98\nuint64_t sample_max = static_cast(static_cast(UINT64_MAX) * sample_rate);\n\n// lines 215-216\nsample_rate = min_value_map.get_max_value() * 1.0 / static_cast(UINT64_MAX);\n```\n\nI kept it out of this PR because a docs-only change should not carry an unrelated fix to the MRC profiler, and the fix wants its own review. Happy to open that PR if you want it.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_","\n### 💡 Codex Review\n\nHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.\n\n**Reviewed commit:** `8b5f956c1d`\n \n\n

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Correct the adoption-entry total**\n\nThe census contains 14 rows assigned adoption classes A–D: nine research rows, three distribution rows, and two ecosystem rows. Recording only eight in the version changelog makes the historical summary inconsistent with the edition it describes and leaves future maintainers without a reliable baseline for tracking changes.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Do not classify format compatibility as built-on adoption**\n\nUnder this document's own definition, class B requires a work to be implemented on top of or extend libCacheSim, but the quoted evidence only says that this trace collection provides a format suitable for use with libCacheSim. Shipping compatible data or tutorials does not establish that `cache_dataset` itself is built on the library, so this row overstates the census unless a source showing actual implementation or execution is provided.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","**_{_{![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)}} Pin the citation URL to this census commit**\n\nThe recommended citation points to `develop`, even though the preceding text promises a commit-pinned permalink. Once this document is revised in place, that URL will resolve to the newest edition rather than v1.0.0, preventing readers from retrieving the exact cited census; use the immutable commit URL here and in the BibTeX entry.\n\nUseful? React with 👍 / 👎.","docs: add source-linked adoption census (doc/adoption.md, v1.0.0)","## What this adds\n\n`doc/adoption.md` — a versioned, source-linked inventory of where libCacheSim is actually used. Every entry links to the primary source that supports it and states the **class of evidence** that source provides:\n\n| Class | Meaning |\n|---|---|\n| A | vendored / forked |\n| B | built on |\n| C | used as-is |\n| D | distributes |\n| E | cites only (recorded, **not** counted as adoption) |\n\nEntries without a checkable source are not listed.\n\n## First edition (v1.0.0, census date 2026-08-13)\n\n**Research artifacts that vendor libCacheSim** — GL-Cache (FAST '23), S3-FIFO (SOSP '23), SIEVE (NSDI '24); each artifact README describes itself as \"a snapshot of libCacheSim\".\n\n**Third-party work built on it** — 3L-Cache (FAST '25, forked from libCacheSim and later upstreamed here via #119), PolicySmith (arXiv:2510.08803), Vulcan (arXiv:2512.25065), DynamicAdaptiveClimb (arXiv:2511.21235), SCION (arXiv:2605.01055). Each row quotes the sentence in the paper that states the use.\n\n**Independent cross-validation** — the Caffeine maintainer running libCacheSim against Caffeine's own simulator to re-check published S3-FIFO/SIEVE numbers (#18), recorded separately because adversarial third-party use is stronger evidence than citation.\n\n**Distribution** — PyPI `libcachesim`, npm `libcachesim-node`, GitHub releases, with exact package state and download volume plus the caveat that download counts include CI/mirror traffic.\n\n**Ecosystem** — CacheBench (UCSC OSPO Summer of Reproducibility) and `cache_dataset`.\n\n**Deliberately kept separate:**\n- *Repository signals* (339 stars / 111 forks / 36 contributors) are reported apart from sourced adoption, and forks are explicitly not counted — nearly all are dormant snapshots.\n- *Downstream SIEVE/S3-FIFO reimplementations* (Ceph, TiDB spot-verified; the wider SIEVE-site list flagged as self-reported and unverified) are labelled **algorithm adoption, not libCacheSim adoption** — the most likely way a census like this gets misread.\n\n**Rejections are part of the record** — six candidates examined and excluded with reasons, including two name collisions (`project-kona/KCacheSim`, PyPI `cachebench`), three papers with no libCacheSim reference in the full text, and one paywalled paper marked unverified rather than assumed.\n\n**Method limits are stated** — no repo-wide code search and no citation-graph sweep were run, so the counts are an explicit lower bound. The census also notes that libCacheSim has no Zenodo DOI and no `CITATION.cff`, which is why citing a specific edition currently relies on a commit permalink.\n\n## Maintenance\n\nThe document carries a version, a census date, a repository snapshot SHA, a changelog, the exact commands to reproduce every number, and a four-item checklist for adding an entry (source URL, verbatim quote, evidence class, verification date). Linked from `README.md` and the `doc/` index.\n\n## Notes for review\n\n- Docs only — no code, build, or CI changes.\n- All in-repo relative links were checked to resolve.\n- Optional follow-up, not included here to keep the diff scoped: add a `CITATION.cff` and mint a Zenodo DOI, which would give both the software and this census stable archival identifiers.\n\n🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)\n\nhttps://claude.ai/code/session_01WCUG9YH1JDDnNwWwfg8hn4\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01WCUG9YH1JDDnNwWwfg8hn4)_","base_ref","7c169cf596fa9aa7ad3a47dee18bc6b243db1834","head_ref","pull_request_info",[632],{"_544":57,"_57":633},"Two updates in 6d3c5d6.\n\n**Sections removed as requested.** \"Known gaps and limitations\", \"Examined and not included\", and \"Reproducing this census\" are gone; the downstream-algorithm section renumbered 7 → 6, and every reference that pointed into the removed text was repaired.\n\n**Wider sweep, four new verified entries.** The earlier edition was built from targeted search, which is why it read as a lower bound. This pass added full-text and archive indexes: [OpenAlex](https://api.openalex.org/works?filter=fulltext.search:libCacheSim) `fulltext.search` (16 works), Software Heritage origin search, and the fork list. GitHub-wide code search stayed out of reach — grep.app is behind a challenge and the session's API access is repo-scoped — so code-level users who never name the library in prose are still invisible.\n\n| New entry | Class | Evidence |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Cache is King: Smart Page Eviction with eBPF** — Zussman et al. (Columbia; IBM Research) | B | \"We implement LHD using cachebpf, based on the implementation in libcachesim [69, 70, 72]\" — an eBPF page-cache port derived from libCacheSim's LHD |\n| **MetaMuse: Algorithm Generation via Creative Ideation** — Ma, Liang, Gao, Yan (Microsoft Research) | C | \"these n traces are generated by libCacheSim … from different Zipfian distributions\" — used as trace generator |\n| **T3-LRU** (Research Square preprint) | A | Evaluated in a libCacheSim fork archived on Zenodo as *\"rim99/libCacheSim: T3LRU Simulation … a high performance library for building cache simulators & T3-LRU simulation added\"* |\n| **PolicySmith** | — | Moved from arXiv preprint to its published venue, **HotNets '25** (10.1145/3772356.3772413) |\n\nWorth noting on the T3-LRU row: a third-party fork of this project now has a Zenodo DOI while upstream does not, so that fork is currently the more citable artifact.\n\n**Checked and left out**, since a lead is not evidence: CAPSULE (its Zenodo record is **retracted** — OpenAlex still indexes it); ScaleOPT (SIGMETRICS '25, benchmarks *against* libCacheSim as a baseline — credible, but ACM returns 403 here and neither the repo nor a preprint carries the sentence); CoNEXT '21 LHR and IEEE CLUSTER '25 FIFO-MEP (paywalled); and `@realtmxi/libcachesim-node`, which is prerelease staging of the in-tree binding, not an independent republish.\n\n@chatgpt-codex-connector's point on the third-party subtotal was right, and applies one row further than reported: `cache_dataset` sits in the cacheMon org **and** CacheBench was built by a project collaborator under project mentorship, so both are project-affiliated. Both rows are now labelled as such and excluded from the third-party subtotal.\n\nCounts restated: **14 adoption entries (9 third-party)**, 3 distribution channels, **17 sourced rows**, 5×A / 6×B / 4×C / 3×D.\n\n---\n_Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_",[664,665,666],[],{"_321":663},{"_318":662},{"_318":661},{"_284":285,"_274":286,"_287":288,"_289":70,"_290":18,"_291":18,"_292":293,"_294":295,"_296":245,"_297":138,"_298":299,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":305,"_306":-5,"_307":-5,"_308":660,"_310":311,"_312":313,"_314":315,"_316":43},{"_53":134,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":18,"_177":178,"_179":180,"_181":649,"_183":-5,"_184":-5,"_185":18,"_186":650,"_188":178,"_189":178,"_190":651,"_192":652,"_194":653,"_196":-5,"_197":198,"_199":200,"_201":202,"_203":654,"_66":-5,"_130":205,"_206":655,"_208":656,"_210":211,"_212":18,"_213":18},{"_144":642},[643,644,645],{"_156":648,"_158":169},{"_156":647,"_158":165},{"_156":646,"_158":159},{"_160":161,"_104":162,"_130":163},{"_160":166,"_104":162,"_130":167},{"_160":170,"_104":162,"_130":171},{"_276":277,"_278":279,"_280":178,"_281":-5,"_282":-5,"_283":-5},[235],{"_235":657},{"_217":218,"_219":220,"_221":222,"_223":224,"_225":226,"_227":228,"_229":230,"_231":232,"_233":234},{},[],{"_216":70},{"_214":70,"_215":178},{"_53":237,"_160":238,"_239":658,"_241":175,"_242":243,"_244":245,"_246":247,"_248":249,"_250":251,"_252":75,"_253":18,"_254":-5,"_255":-5,"_256":-5,"_257":-5,"_258":-5,"_259":-5,"_260":261,"_262":-5,"_66":659},{"_268":269,"_53":270,"_104":271,"_272":273,"_274":275},{"_264":18,"_265":18,"_266":18,"_267":18},{"_268":269,"_160":269,"_317":-5,"_272":273,"_53":270},[],[],[],{"_104":537,"_108":105,"_365":675},{"_104":351,"_352":670},{"_104":326,"_327":328,"_329":330,"_331":667,"_333":-5},{"_104":331,"_334":335,"_139":140,"_336":-5,"_307":337,"_338":668,"_340":341,"_342":43,"_343":341,"_344":345,"_346":669},{"_348":349,"_350":-5},[],[671],{"_355":356,"_357":-5,"_358":672,"_360":-5},[673],{"_362":341,"_363":364,"_365":674,"_367":70},[368,178,369,370,371,178,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,178,379,380,381,178,382,178,383,178,384,385,386,178,387,388,389,390,391,178,392,178,393,373,394,395,396,397,398,178,399,400,401,178,382,178,402,178,403,178,404,405,406,407,408,178,409,410,411,412,178,413,178,414,405,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422,178,423,178,424,405,425,178,426,427,428,178,382,178,429,178,430,431,432,433,434,435,178,436,405,437,438,439,178,440,441,442,443,444,178,445,446,447,448,449,178,382,178,450,178,451,452,453,454,178,455,456,457,458,178,459,460,461,462,463,178,382,178,464,178,465,466,178,467,373,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,178,475,476,477,478,479,178,480,481,482,178,382,178,483,178,484,485,486,487,178,488,178,489,490,491,492,178,493,494,495,496,497,178,382,178,498,178,499,500,501,502,178,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,178,511,178,512,513,514,515,516,512,178,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,512,178,531,532,178,533,178,382,178,534,178,535,490,536],[676,677,678,679,680],{"_544":57,"_57":551},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":549,"_363":550},{"_544":57,"_57":548},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":547,"_363":364},{"_544":57,"_57":545},[711,712,713],[],{"_321":710},{"_318":709},{"_318":708},{"_284":285,"_274":286,"_287":288,"_289":70,"_290":18,"_291":18,"_292":293,"_294":295,"_296":245,"_297":138,"_298":299,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":305,"_306":-5,"_307":-5,"_308":707,"_310":311,"_312":313,"_314":315,"_316":43},{"_53":134,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":18,"_177":178,"_179":180,"_181":696,"_183":-5,"_184":-5,"_185":18,"_186":697,"_188":178,"_189":178,"_190":698,"_192":699,"_194":700,"_196":-5,"_197":198,"_199":200,"_201":202,"_203":701,"_66":-5,"_130":205,"_206":702,"_208":703,"_210":211,"_212":18,"_213":18},{"_144":689},[690,691,692],{"_156":695,"_158":169},{"_156":694,"_158":165},{"_156":693,"_158":159},{"_160":161,"_104":162,"_130":163},{"_160":166,"_104":162,"_130":167},{"_160":170,"_104":162,"_130":171},{"_276":277,"_278":279,"_280":178,"_281":-5,"_282":-5,"_283":-5},[235],{"_235":704},{"_217":218,"_219":220,"_221":222,"_223":224,"_225":226,"_227":228,"_229":230,"_231":232,"_233":234},{},[],{"_216":70},{"_214":70,"_215":178},{"_53":237,"_160":238,"_239":705,"_241":175,"_242":243,"_244":245,"_246":247,"_248":249,"_250":251,"_252":75,"_253":18,"_254":-5,"_255":-5,"_256":-5,"_257":-5,"_258":-5,"_259":-5,"_260":261,"_262":-5,"_66":706},{"_268":269,"_53":270,"_104":271,"_272":273,"_274":275},{"_264":18,"_265":18,"_266":18,"_267":18},{"_268":269,"_160":269,"_317":-5,"_272":273,"_53":270},[],[],[],{"_104":537,"_108":105,"_365":722},{"_104":351,"_352":717},{"_104":326,"_327":328,"_329":330,"_331":714,"_333":-5},{"_104":331,"_334":335,"_139":140,"_336":-5,"_307":337,"_338":715,"_340":341,"_342":43,"_343":341,"_344":345,"_346":716},{"_348":349,"_350":-5},[],[718],{"_355":356,"_357":-5,"_358":719,"_360":-5},[720],{"_362":341,"_363":364,"_365":721,"_367":70},[368,178,369,370,371,178,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,178,379,380,381,178,382,178,383,178,384,385,386,178,387,388,389,390,391,178,392,178,393,373,394,395,396,397,398,178,399,400,401,178,382,178,402,178,403,178,404,405,406,407,408,178,409,410,411,412,178,413,178,414,405,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422,178,423,178,424,405,425,178,426,427,428,178,382,178,429,178,430,431,432,433,434,435,178,436,405,437,438,439,178,440,441,442,443,444,178,445,446,447,448,449,178,382,178,450,178,451,452,453,454,178,455,456,457,458,178,459,460,461,462,463,178,382,178,464,178,465,466,178,467,373,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,178,475,476,477,478,479,178,480,481,482,178,382,178,483,178,484,485,486,487,178,488,178,489,490,491,492,178,493,494,495,496,497,178,382,178,498,178,499,500,501,502,178,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,178,511,178,512,513,514,515,516,512,178,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,512,178,531,532,178,533,178,382,178,534,178,535,490,536],[723,724,725,726,727],{"_544":57,"_57":551},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":549,"_363":550},{"_544":57,"_57":548},{"_544":546,"_355":356,"_362":547,"_363":364},{"_544":57,"_57":545},[730,731,732,733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,749,750],{"_561":562,"_241":175,"_563":285,"_252":-5,"_334":235,"_564":18,"_565":-5,"_566":-5,"_567":568,"_569":570,"_571":-5,"_572":-5,"_573":574,"_575":18,"_576":70,"_577":65,"_578":18,"_579":-5},{"_104":537,"_108":308,"_365":751},{"_292":625,"_294":626,"_627":628,"_629":140,"_304":-5,"_104":630},{"_104":601,"_294":624,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":623,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":622,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":621,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":620,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":619,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":617,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":618},{"_104":601,"_294":616,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":615,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":614,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":613,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":612,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":611,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":610,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":609,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":608,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":607,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":605,"_355":356,"_603":606,"_604":-5},{"_104":601,"_294":602,"_355":-5,"_603":-5,"_604":-5},[752],{"_544":57,"_57":633},"task_e_6a7d1201023c8322a0fccefe4b6737f9",1786581505.008833,"GitHub Mention: docs: add source-linked adoption census (doc/adoption.md, v1.0.0)","has_generated_title","has_unread_turn","denormalized_metadata",{"_784":43,"_785":786,"_787":-5,"_788":-5,"_778":789,"_790":-5,"_791":-5,"_792":-5,"_793":-5},"task_status_display",{"_772":773,"_774":175,"_141":138,"_775":-5,"_776":326},"creator_workspace","external_pull_requests",[765],{"_53":766,"_767":95,"_768":769,"_770":140},"github-273598269-323","assistant_turn_id","pull_request",{"_284":285,"_274":286,"_287":288,"_289":70,"_290":18,"_291":18,"_292":293,"_294":295,"_296":245,"_297":138,"_298":299,"_300":301,"_302":-5,"_303":-5,"_304":305,"_306":-5,"_307":-5,"_308":771,"_310":311,"_312":313,"_314":315,"_316":43},"codex_updated_sha",{"_268":269,"_160":269,"_317":-5,"_272":273,"_53":270},"latest_turn_status_display",{"_777":95,"_123":124,"_778":779,"_106":780,"_781":-5,"_782":-5,"_783":326,"_125":-5},"environment_label","fix_task_id","initial_intent","turn_id","diff_stats",{"_340":341,"_342":43,"_343":341},[],"image_asset_pointer_citations","issue_counts","intent","num_follow_ups","repo_name_map",{},"last_user_turn_created_at","last_turn_status",{"_340":-5,"_342":-5,"_343":-5},"last_pushed_turn_id","start_branch_name","pushed_branch_name","cached_pull_request_data","dd",{"_808":809,"_810":811},"disablePrefetch","shouldPrefetchAccount","shouldPrefetchUser","shouldPrefetchSystemHints","manageRootRouteStylesheet","mobileWebHandoffEnabled","promoteCss","disableSSR","stripModulepreloadImports","paidCampaignAppRedirect","statsigGateEvaluationsPromise",["P",807],"traceId","2576852989447715776","traceTime",1788046977890]